Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The question remains; Is an intake modification considered an engine modification?

I'm pretty sure you'd be allowed to get a bigger exhaust (provided noise was kept legal) so I can't se a problem with the othert end of the engine.

You could probably successfully argue that the engine is completely stock, which it is, and your car keeps with the letter of the law.

The wasy I read it is that they're trying to keep p-platers out of bored and stroked engines.

I think that if you were being a tool on the road, the copper would pull you over and give you a ticket. If not for the pod then for noise or anything he could think of. They consider it part of their job to make life difficult for hoons.

If you're driving sensibly, I don't think you'd have a problem. I've only been pulled over once in my skyline, and that was when it had no plates on, as I was on my way to compliance. I've even been waved through plenty of bretho's etc, although, I am not on my P's, so it's not quite the same.

I reckon you'd be safe, but the risk is up to you really.

  • Replies 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

hmm, yeh i think your right, just be on the safe side i guess.

btw, whats the induction noise like in a gts? i would never have thought it would be that loud to be noticed?

Edited by sillylankan
There is one CLEAR answer - "Any modification that has the potential to alter a cars performance may be deemed as a power modification". Simple, the law is black and white, not shades of grey as some people would like to think.

And thats the point really right there :(

There is no way to "read" it differently when its spelled out in plain english i reckon

i would classify it as an engine mod and im pretty sure so would the cops. my car has a yellow air filter in it and im not sure what brand it is but it makes a sucking sound but its not very loud though. the weired thing is ive driven past lots of cops in my skyline and they have never pulled me over at all. in my area they tend to just pull over old bombs and holdens and fords with stockies on the rear.

An interesting and sensible topic...I have another option for you, fit a cotton panel filter as suggested by other posters, they're really very good. Then take the top off of your airbox and make some discreet slots or holes in the sides that face forward and towards the innerguard, do it on those sides only...rear and engine side will suck in too much hot air. Cutting the slots right on the corner is easiest

a hand saw would do the job. Do a neat job and it will never be picked. Less heat soak than a pod and it will give you increased flow and maybe even that induction sound you yearn.

DO NOT MAKE HOLE BELOW THE FILTER>>>DO THE LID ONLY it's also easy to change back if things aren't running as well as you'd like.

I have been doing this on gtst's for a while and have had np's performance wise unlike pods in hot weather.

Rick

hmm, yeh i think your right, just be on the safe side i guess.

btw, whats the induction noise like in a gts? i would never have thought it would be that loud to be noticed?

It aint loud at all.. infact i dont even notice it on there (thats with my k&n anyway) i wouldn't mind a bit of a woosh noise but dont exactly want to spend the 100 bucks again on another pod yet, im actually thinking of taking it off and putting the stock air box back in because i think the performance could be better (especially now with the heat) even though i have it sectioned off from the engine heat and still have the stock cold air intake atm. Maybe buy a electronic BOV if you want the SSSSSSSSSSTUTUTTUTUTU... jks (they actually have them tho :s)

An interesting and sensible topic...I have another option for you, fit a cotton panel filter as suggested by other posters, they're really very good. Then take the top off of your airbox and make some discreet slots or holes in the sides that face forward and towards the innerguard, do it on those sides only...rear and engine side will suck in too much hot air. Cutting the slots right on the corner is easiest

a hand saw would do the job. Do a neat job and it will never be picked. Less heat soak than a pod and it will give you increased flow and maybe even that induction sound you yearn.

DO NOT MAKE HOLE BELOW THE FILTER>>>DO THE LID ONLY it's also easy to change back if things aren't running as well as you'd like.

I have been doing this on gtst's for a while and have had np's performance wise unlike pods in hot weather.

Rick

errrm, let me get this straight - ur saying to make slits/holes above the filter?

So whats filtering the dusty air getting in?

errrm, let me get this straight - ur saying to make slits/holes above the filter?

So whats filtering the dusty air getting in?

The filter?

If you are making holes in the lid the air still has to pass through the filter. Same basic principle as the snorkel

errrm, let me get this straight - ur saying to make slits/holes above the filter?

So whats filtering the dusty air getting in?

In short ...THE FILTER :rolleyes:

2 spell it out...

Your induction pipe runs into the airbox lid... the lid holds the filter in place @ the top of the air box.

So to answer the question if I drill holes or cut slots into the front right hand corner of the lid (not the top its 2 visible)

the air filter catches the dust or whatever tha same as it alway does. This just increases flow and reduces cavitation for 0 cost.

If you want it easily reversable go and get some rubber bungs/grommets from super cheap or similar then drill holes 2 suit the bungs instead of slots in the airbox lid.

don't like it..........plug holes with bungs and your back 2 stock.

DO NOT MAKE HOLES IN YOUR AIRBOX!!!! just the front r/h/s corner of the lid (furthest from the engine) less heat there

Just to crarify again the holes/slots are to be made on the r/h/s corner down the side of the AIR BOX LID

It's a very simple mod, the ones I like the best.

Delljits on the money...basically the same setup, just it's free to do. you still have the nice cold air from the induction pipe but you also get added volume by doing this...and the airs still pretty cool @ the front corner off the engine bay.

Edited by madbung
think i better play it safe and not get one

i have already sacrificed a turbo. what is a pod filter

my car right now is stock as a rock besides a muffler modification.

yeh, my point exactly. There's not really much point spending money on performance mods for your car for two main reasons, 1 being that they arnt gonna do much, and 2 being a p plater makes it very hard for you and risky with the new laws. Hold out till you get off your p's and buy a turbo model.

you will be sweet i rekon. if it worries you that much id just get an apexi panel, or KnN, take out the sound deadening padding on the inside of the top of the box and be done.

It may not give you a louder noise than a pod. but hey.. it helps. At the end of the day, you would probably be fine, but if your concerned about it then dont bother.

think i better play it safe and not get one

i have already sacrificed a turbo. what is a pod filter

my car right now is stock as a rock besides a muffler modification.

So you have replaced your stock rear muffler?

If so put the pod on (if you like) as you have already broken the law, and if a cop is going to get you for the pod, he'll get you for the muffler too.

Pods, mufflers, extractors, fmic, etc are ALL considered as performance enhancing mods.

I don't think so either, but if they do, I don't think it'll be much.

You would be suprised. Got a 3A Racing pod on mine. Give it some stick and it sounds great :D

Finster, I would be more concerned with the exhaust mod you have than the pod filter. Id say that would be the first thing cops would be looking for on a P plater car. Like Al said, you might aswell chuck a pod in it now. Just keep it nice and neat and when you get off your p's, sell it and buy a gtst. Or, if it has too much sentimental value, decide to respray it, become too attached to it and don't want to sell it anymore (like I have), do a conversion (like I am) ;)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...