Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Kkr's aren't shit ..

however the kkr430 would have been the better option... unless you want to use it for just drags etc. it's not going to get great response with a stock engine,

John Cane runs (drifter) runs a kkr430 on his Rb25det in his laurel and it goes awesome!

Read specs here > otomoto

I beg to differ.

This guy is making 219rwkw using 19psi and only making full boost at 4500rpm: That is complete SHIT!!

A turbo that only makes 220rwkw should be on full song by 3300rpm. That power is equal to a hi-flowed rb25 turbo at 15psi and look how responsive those are; WITH A STD MOTOR. Not to mention the extra boost required with the KKR shit, is putting more stress on the rest of the motor and creating more heat.

I have previously heard these KKR turbos were laggy, for the power they produce; this has just settled the debate. At the end of the day they are another cheap, China shit turbo that are inefficient and can't make the power with acceptable response.

HKS :D

KKR :(

looks like its hks time lol

when i drove his car with the 2530 it felt like a stock turbo but had alot more mid range/low down torque felt nice, he was only running stock injectors still so car was not really making much more power then mine but felt nice

looks like ill go with the hks item:D

is mid 12s @ 115mph possible with the 2530 turbo?

looks like its hks time lol

when i drove his car with the 2530 it felt like a stock turbo but had alot more mid range/low down torque felt nice, he was only running stock injectors still so car was not really making much more power then mine but felt nice

looks like ill go with the hks item:D

is mid 12s @ 115mph possible with the 2530 turbo?

12s are possible on a stock turbo :D

only making around 295rwhp

yes its laggy bout 4500rpm full boost

the car with 2530 on it i took it for a drive last nite, very good low down torque and mid range wheel spins coming on in 2nd but yeah

i dunno wot to do lol

help me!!! some ppl say 2530 2 small for rb25? im only really after 300rwhp would 2530 get me there easy enough?

what are your other mods, other people in the rb25 turbo dyno thread are making 260rwkw. what are you maxing out?

car come over with 200,000kms phil told me that 6 months after i bought it lol

yes u mite get 12s at 106mph with stock turbo but i want big mph not shit mph lol there is a difference

2 weeks ago i ran a 13.5@102mph in a complete stock r33 on 10psi:)

but it never felt fast cause mph was shit house.

basically the dyno i had my car tuned on made X amount of power

a mate had his car dynoed on same dyno and made 203rwkw or something like that

he went and got a power run on milanco dyno which is a brissy tuner and made 240rwkw or there bouts.. so that mite be my 260rwkw who knows... remember its only tunning tool

Edited by l0WRB
RB30 it and keep the kkr :D

Even with an rb30, the turbo (kkr) is still shit. You'll make more power, better response, and use less psi; if you use a Garrett/HKS/Trust/Apexi/etc turbo.

I am currently building an rb30det and am using a Garrett GT30R (500hp). I am expecting this combo to be more responsive than a rb25 hi-flow, on a rb25; yet make 300-330 rwkw :(.

f**k the rb30 lol

my car is budget and it does 500kms a week its my daily so yeah

well i would be happy with 112mph and 12.5-12.8s and 2sec 60ft's lol

better then my 13.3s and 2.4 60fts

mid 12's at 115mph?

I have an old timeslip at home from WSID, running my hks 2530 on 100% stock motor, no special suspension just re55's, if i recall correctly i ran 12.5 @115mph, with a 1.9sec 60ft! i will try and dig up the slip later to confirm.

If i remember, peak power at the time was just under 218rwkw. Its not the peak that you feel with the 2530, its the punch it gives you mid range, which is fun and makes for great overtaking :(

I enjoyed the 2530 every moment i had it, but the 2835pro i have on it now, :D -but then if its a budget consideration forget it..

Reading this thread the answer is very clear. Whats the point of a daily driver that hits f*kk boost by 4500? Especially if its only making small kw's go for the response :dry:

you still have not mentioned what other mods you have, if you are still running standard injectors, afm and fuel pump then that will be a problem, also do you have a boost controller, wouldnt be hard to set up an avcr or something with lots of settings wrong.

LINK ECU, MAP sensor

700cc injectors

3" dump/exhaust/gutted cat

button clutch

gktech cooler kit

lol at 700cc injectors for 210 rwkw.

but dont stress my last MPH was 116 for a low 13...hahah more to t a good time than a lot of power... I would go the HKS...get some good response and have a nice fast street car.

As mentioned , the figures you quoted are way crap.

looks like its hks time lol

when i drove his car with the 2530 it felt like a stock turbo but had alot more mid range/low down torque felt nice, he was only running stock injectors still so car was not really making much more power then mine but felt nice

looks like ill go with the hks item:D

is mid 12s @ 115mph possible with the 2530 turbo?

I had a 2530 setup on mine, making 225rwkw at 19psi. Best with this setup was a 12.55@113mph. Was a nice easy street setup.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
    • Probably not. A workshop grade scantool is my go to for proper Consult interrogation. Any workshop grade tool should do it. Just go to a workshop.
    • In my head it does make sense to be a fuel problem since that is what I touched when cleaning the system. When I was testing with the fuel pressure gauge, the pressure was constantly 2.5 bar with the FPR vacuum removed. When stalling, the pressure was going up to 3.0 bar (which is how it should be on ignition).
    • ECUtalk pages don't mention they support the ABS computer (consult port has more than one CAN), so you might just need a different scan tool. But, I would expect ABS is a different light to the brake warning/handbrake light, do you see an ABS light come on for a few seconds when you turn the key from ACC to IGN? But since you said: I'd have a look at the ABS sensors in the rear hubs to make sure they are not damaged, disconnected etc.
×
×
  • Create New...