Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Im just about to dyno the car and i did a compression test

i got 190psi on all exept for for i got 187psi..

mind you i have only done 77km on the clock

Now some people say omg it should 150 psi

and other say it should be between 170 - 190

what area your thoughts ???????????????????

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/195400-compression-test/
Share on other sites

wet or dry test?

i think its sposed to be about 140-150 dry and and 160-170 wet but i could be wrong. im assuming you are referring to a rb25det.

you are lucky, i made a post yesterday about my 10 000km engine having 0psi in one of the cylinders...

wet or dry test?

i think its sposed to be about 140-150 dry and and 160-170 wet but i could be wrong. im assuming you are referring to a rb25det.

you are lucky, i made a post yesterday about my 10 000km engine having 0psi in one of the cylinders...

yeah i have R33 GTS25T

Im about to have a heart attack i dont want my motor to blow.....

oooooo sorry to hear about ur cylinder

yeah i have R33 GTS25T

Im about to have a heart attack i dont want my motor to blow.....

oooooo sorry to hear about ur cylinder

From what nearly every thread that questions like this have been asked, it more or less is irrelivent what the final number is (within reason) so long as each cylinder is pretty much the same within 4-5 points i believe.

Wellll how about this

Hills motorsoports said that it is should be about 150psi and 190 is far to much

Atm where my car is at Bel garage. they said 190 is high but excellent

factory compression in a RB25 is 172psi.

So if you have more you have a shaved head or decked block.

Either that or they put different pistons in when it was built.

But I have seen compression testers vary up to 30psi. My last one said I had 200psi in each cylinder. But they were all within 3 psi of each other so I didn't care.

factory compression in a RB25 is 172psi.

So if you have more you have a shaved head or decked block.

Either that or they put different pistons in when it was built.

But I have seen compression testers vary up to 30psi. My last one said I had 200psi in each cylinder. But they were all within 3 psi of each other so I didn't care.

Thanks for that mafia..............

The test on mine went 190 on everyone except for the forth wich was about 186-187.

how i just installed a gt35......... am i in trouble

What the guys said above is correct. Worry about variation between the cylinders rather than the actual number.

If you use a different comp tester, the results will be different again.

The actual number means squat (unless if it is reading ridiculous like 50 across all 6, which would most likely mean that the tester is f**ked, the person is an idiot and did it wrong, or the whole motor is f**ked)

Sounds like you have a healthy engine there , stock pressure should be around 170 psi (12.2kg cm2) on RB25 det @ 300rpm, warm engine ( normal operating temp) and WOT. If any of the above vary you will get different results.

If you use a thinner h/gasket , deck the block or cyl head the pressure will be higher , if you have carbon built up the pressure will be higher .

If you want to be sure on the condition why not do a leakdown test ??

Sounds like you have a healthy engine there , stock pressure should be around 170 psi (12.2kg cm2) on RB25 det @ 300rpm, warm engine ( normal operating temp) and WOT. If any of the above vary you will get different results.

If you use a thinner h/gasket , deck the block or cyl head the pressure will be higher , if you have carbon built up the pressure will be higher .

If you want to be sure on the condition why not do a leakdown test ??

Leak down test is used for when you have a low compression..................

what do mean deck the block????/ herd that alot lately but not understanding

Leak down test is used for when you have a low compression..................

what do mean deck the block????/ herd that alot lately but not understanding

You can have a perfect comp dude on all cyl with worn piston rings and or bore because the oil can take up the wear and hold perfect comp. If that was the case when you do a leakdown test you could have say 25% leakdown pressure loss). Now I'm not saying for one minute that this is the case with your donk, as I said before it seams its in good nick.

Deck the block/head= shaving a few thou" . Has the same effect as using a thinner head gasket..

You can have a perfect comp dude on all cyl with worn piston rings and or bore because the oil can take up the wear and hold perfect comp. If that was the case when you do a leakdown test you could have say 25% leakdown pressure loss). Now I'm not saying for one minute that this is the case with your donk, as I said before it seams its in good nick.

Deck the block/head= shaving a few thou" . Has the same effect as using a thinner head gasket..

Well the boys at bel my engine is in good nick and you should be happy it has a high compression

i just spent a crapload on my car dont wanna spend no more

btw..... why would someone shave the head on a Skyline

if the head is pitted, warped/not perfectly flat....You shave the head so it has a flat face for a new headgasket to seal. Generally when rebuilding a motor, you shave the head in which they only take off what they need inorder to get it flat, same with the block. Unless your building a wild motor with custom pistons/rods and you need to deck the block to achieve a desired CR and squish area.

A smaller area for the same air/fuel to be squeezed into results in a bigger/powerful bang equals more power...however it can also make it more prone to preignition.

Sounds like you have a healthy engine there , stock pressure should be around 170 psi (12.2kg cm2) on RB25 det @ 300rpm, warm engine ( normal operating temp) and WOT. If any of the above vary you will get different results.

If you use a thinner h/gasket , deck the block or cyl head the pressure will be higher , if you have carbon built up the pressure will be higher .

If you want to be sure on the condition why not do a leakdown test ??

whats the stock pressure for RB26dett?

also is carbon build up a bad thing?? or is it just the black smoke that comes out when the car is floored.

whats the stock pressure for RB26dett?

also is carbon build up a bad thing?? or is it just the black smoke that comes out when the car is floored.

A little lower than RB25, 12.2kg cm2,

Carbon built up is not a good thing but it happens on most engines with age .

A little lower than RB25, 12.2kg cm2,

Carbon built up is not a good thing but it happens on most engines with age .

It usually gets blown out the tailpipe when you really floor that shit.

Carbon buildup is a funny thing, its not good, but half the time when you run an engine cleaner or whatever through the oil and fuel you tend to start burning oil and blowing blue smoke..

So sometimes the carbon buildup is a good thing as its sealing off its wear and tear from being old.

Id be shit scared to run any in the oil in my Hiace, 400,000km (that the speedo reads, :) its wayyy more) and piston slap when its really cold... dam if i cleaned the carbon out of that id probly burn more oil than i could put in it.

A little lower than RB25, 12.2kg cm2,

Carbon built up is not a good thing but it happens on most engines with age .

is carbon build up necessarily a tired engine?? rebuild soon?

this is from 130,000 kms 1997 R33 GTR with 175 compression im looking at

Edited by RodMonsta

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...