Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 153
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

lots of people run nos on the street even though it is illegal, most say as long as its not hooked up your fine unless you attract their attention...

I've stayed away from it because of the defect factor... you should be able to get away with it, it would just worry me that one day if you get a defect it means you would have to pull it all out to get rid of the defect notice.... otherwise eveyone would do it...

A good mechanic should be able to do a virtually indetectable install, along with a custom stereo will provide and area to hide the bottle... Thats how mine was anyway...

Bit if its a show car.. its lost all of its bling..

THE RESULTS ARE IN!!!!!!!!!

Ok everyone.... im pretty happy with the final results, i could have gotten more, but decided against it as i preferred to stay in the "safe" zone to begin with.

128 kW at the rear wheels without nos

and 152 kW at the rear wheels with nos.

like i said before im happy with the results, as i have stay in the safe zone.

:D

Not sure about S.A.; but in VIC if a car is caught with any part of a NOS kit installed, a fine of $2000 per cylinder applies. That's right ;) $12,000 for our cars. If this is an EPA issue (not roadworthy) then i dare say the fine applies nation wide.

Not to burst your bubble, but is 24rwkw really worth the risk? Especially when a 100% standard GTT produces that power and probably a little more. Put an exhaust, fmic, Pfc and some more boost, on a GTT, and you wont be anywhere to be seen :D .

hmmm...i would be looking carefully at the graph with the NOS

there is only a 24kw increase in peak power (which is about 32 HP)

really there should be around a 55kw increase as NOS is fairly affective at achieving the stated HP gain...

i want to see a torque curve....

umm... nitrous is basically air just with a slightly higher oxygen saturation (33% compared to ~20%ish)

regardless its still air/N2O (oxygen) under pressure being forced into the intake - doubtful that it would account for 18kw, i think the difference is mainly the dyno.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • I went and found the actual FSM again (Yeah, I squirreled...) Screen grab of the FSM for M35. 51PSi with engine idling.  
    • I thought the same too, and more than happy for others to bring another source for what it is. Just throwing so me caution out there, as potentially an extra 30% current needed than expected.   Well worth more investigation, but right now, I'm going over my Cypher knowledge while Expendables 4 provides mundane noise in the background, ha ha!
    • You still around Terry?
    • If true then....wierd. That's a very high base fuel pressure for a shitty old early 2000s Nissan.
    • I may have my math slightly wrong, I'm not double checking that again, but the factory spec for fuel pressure is to set it with the engine IDLING (in vacuum). That spec is 51PSi while idling. So now add +10psi for atmospheric, and +7 for 7psi of boost, and we need 68psi of fuel pressure at full noise, and 51psi idling. That's according to the FSM I found last night for M35. So MINIMUM fuel pressure should be 51psi and it climbs from there.
×
×
  • Create New...