Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi.

Got my s13 - rb25det dyno'ed yesterday. 401.9HK / 528 Nm @ wheels

have only begun to play with the ignition, AFR are still a little rich.

Turbo is a GT3076r. 0.82 exh trim. @ ~1.25 bar boost.

what could the dip in power up top be??

Its a std rb25det bottom end, head is ported and overhauled otherwise std.

Using oct 95 fuel

post-24535-1198921745_thumb.jpg

Edited by nissan200sx.dk
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/199482-my-first-dynorun/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

what could the dip in power up top be??

Rough guess, I'd say the ignition curve could be cranked up (advanced) in that area - dependent on knock.

It looks like your results are similar to The Mafia and Lithium who also run GT3076 on RB25, though I'd like to compare the shape of the curves. Given your AFR might be a little rich, you might find a good bit of extra power there for the taking with extra time tuning. What sort of ECU did you choose?

Did you go with internal gate, or external? I take it that the top graph is boost, in bar (absolute)? The line from 4000rpm is a bit up/down. Maybe your boost controller needs a little adjustment to smooth that out too?

WHY WERE U USING 95RON FUEL!?!?!?!?

There was no indicator of the standard of measurement. Could be RON, MON, or (RON+MON)/2.

Indicators are that he is still working on the tune, and the fuel may not be the limiting factor that you think. It may be that the only requirement to making more grunt is give it more timing.

Let's see what he comes back with.

Hi all.

Thanks for replys.

I am using a apexi FC hooked up with my fc box that is hooked up with a LM1 that is hooked up to my labtop. hehe.

oct 98 is only availible a few places here, want to adjust it to using 95. I will be using methanol injection later on, so the 3 in difference wont do that much.

its with external wastegate. a no name... Could a electronic boost controller help with a little earlier boost?? it comes on a little slow.

Up top my ignition are ~20 mark. Am still learning, so aint so fast to get it sorted all in once.

AF values are around low 10.

Hk is almost the same as BHP. 1kw = 1.34HK

Have an idea to hook up the methanol injector. If I use the signal to one of the injectors, hooked it up to a solid state relay, they are REALLY fast, and can handle 10A, the one im looking at. That relay would then drive the methanol injecter. I am looking at this to get a liniar injection on the methanol.... it will follow the duty cycle of the regular injectors.

Any thought on this?

hey mate, I'm still grabbing that ignition map for you too.

Also, you say your AFR's are 10:1 - that is WAY TOO LOW.

Move them to 11.7:1 or even 12:1.

10:1 and my car wouldn'r run properly. It backfired and hesitated on acceleration. Its absolutely way too rich.

Hi mafia

thanks heaps! :D

I do use the std coils, and have had problem with the spark... could the dip be caused by bad coils?

Also the mixture is still way rich as you say, will get that sorted. I do get some backfire sometimes up top..

It seems unlikely to be coils, as it is occurring after peak torque, however if the ignition timing is slightly retarded, it increases the load on the coils, as the combustion pressure at plug firing is higher. You will usually find that once the engine has gone past peak torque you can start to add some timing back in as the volumetric efficiency is dropping off. If you can put up a graph of the ignition timing with a plot of the cells it goes through on a power run it would be great.

Edited by Adriano
maybe they don't have 98ron where he is?

LMFAO.

do u live in nambour?

drive the extra 5min to a servo that has the fuel.

your an idiot.

- high performance engine + mods= i will have a side dish of detonation with my f**ked tune please

-wtf-

make sure you under stand what you are reading as well with regards to octane it varies in different countries, in australia we use the RON only on the pump to advertise the fuel.

but in alot of european, canadian and the united states, they advertise the AKI or PON number which is RON+MON/2, so if someone in the us has 91 octane fuel as they will say, its equivalent to over 96 RON here is aust.

LMFAO.

do u live in nambour?

drive the extra 5min to a servo that has the fuel.

your an idiot.

- high performance engine + mods= i will have a side dish of detonation with my f**ked tune please

-wtf-

hey, retard, before shooting your mouth off, why don't you look into where the thread starter is actually located? DENMARK.

How about you f*ck off out of this thread, and don't come back?

Edited by The Mafia

Do a skid... :D

And if he's tuning it, on that fuel, it won't detonate...

That's the whole point of doing it.

But, without a retune, there's zero advantage of putting in 98 fuel either...

Hence why it's a placebo when you throw 98 in your excel.

Have an idea to hook up the methanol injector. If I use the signal to one of the injectors, hooked it up to a solid state relay, they are REALLY fast, and can handle 10A, the one im looking at. That relay would then drive the methanol injecter. I am looking at this to get a liniar injection on the methanol.... it will follow the duty cycle of the regular injectors.

Any thought on this?

Adriano:

Will get the AF spot on before i'll add the methanol. But 12.8:1??? Its not 100% methanol.. Only about 5 - 10 % that will be methanol, so can I still use such "lean" AF when I add the methanol?

R33cruiser:

Ehm... Its 30min drive for me to get 98... I only know of 4 places I can get it. A few years back there were alot of places. Dunno why, buts its being removed from market here. We have bio 95... There is a little ethanol in it. I think. And my tune has to be on 95! As its easy to get, and will have the methanol to help with det. Right now I'm still learning to adjust and understand my engine. Have made ALL mods on my car myself, and this is my first car, and have never before messed aruond with cars before this. I know 98 is better, but Im using my car everyday.. So when I tune and deside which fuel I use, that has to be in my consideration. I'll use it everyday.

RB30-power.

Have NO idea which rating the oct 95 is...

Mafia.

:D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
    • The detail level is about right for the money they charge for the full kit... AU$21.00 each issue, 110 issues for a total of $2,300 (I mentioned $2.2K in the first post when the exchange rate was better). $20/week is doable... 😐
    • If planning on joining us for the day(s) please indicate by filling in this form. https://forms.gle/Ma8Nn4DzYVA8uDHg7
×
×
  • Create New...