Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Niki Lauda calls it 'the worst decision in F1's history', Big call- but he's been around the sport for a looong time now.

Yeah, well, hes an idiot who doesnt know what hes talking about, yeah?

I mean what would he know?

I LOLed when i read all this.

There is a sense of humour in F1 after all:

Courtesy of PlanetF1

Stewards To Review Other Results

Thursday 11th September 2008

Following their great success at re-arranging the result of the 2008 Belgian Grand Prix, the race stewards are now turning their attention to other sporting events that have finished. Outraged sports writers from the world's news media have slammed them for having no experience in judging football or athletics or swimming, but now the stewards have hit back. They have rightly pointed out that they have just as much knowledge of floor gymnastics and athletics as they have of F1

Notices of Re-Classification

Olympic 100 metres

The Olympic 100 metres final has been reviewed by the stewards and Usain Bolt has had 25 seconds added to his time. The stewards verdict was that Bolt... "didn't run across the line properly and started celebrating way too early".

Tour de France

Carlos Sastre has hung on to his position as winner of the Tour de France, but second-place man Cadel Evans from Australia has seen his second place wiped out.

"Evans is just a back wheel sucker," said Belgian steward Yves Bacquelain, "he never does any of the work on a climb." As Bacquelain is the same nationality as the great Eddie Merckx his decision cannot be overturned.

Swimming

Michael Phelps has seen his Beijing medal haul cut from eight to seven after the stewards decided to hand the win of the 100m butterfly to Milo Cavic. Apparently second-placed man Cavic was almost there first and morally was the winner.

Gymnastics - Beam

Less controversial is the stewards' ruling that American gymnasts Natia Liukin and Shawn Johnson should swap positions in the Beam event at Beijing. Liukin drew huge praise for her artistic performance on the apparatus but lost out to a more complex, but artistically clunky routine from American rival Johnson. "We have decided that Nastia should get the gold because she is a much fitter than Shawn Johnson," said Nicolas Deschaux

Champions League Final

Chelsea are the new champions of Europe after winning the recalculated penalty shoot-out in Moscow. The stewards decided that Manchester United's narrow victory by 6-5 wasn't correct. They have allowed John Terry's missed penalty to count. "We feel that he would have scored if he hadn't lost his footing on a poorly prepared pitch, which was out of his control and so award him the penalty." Chelsea now win 5-4.

( Especially this one, lol )

F1

And finally, Jenson Button and Nick Heidfeld will both have 10-place grid deductions for the Italian Grand Prix after the Kenyan steward discovered they both had beards as scruffy as Sebastien Loeb's.

Seems most drivers are standing by the stewards on this one..

http://en.f1-live.com/f1/en/headlines/news...911191346.shtml

Jarno, Fisi, Fernando, Seb Bourdais, Nico and others..

Seems most drivers are standing by the stewards on this one..

http://en.f1-live.com/f1/en/headlines/news...911191346.shtml

Jarno, Fisi, Fernando, Seb Bourdais, Nico and others..

As much as I think LH wasnt in the wrong, for me thats not the ultimate point.

Its clear now the paddock is heavily split - on LH's side i would wager and that speaks volumes. I cant remember the last time this has happened...well, perhaps for MS at Monaco but that was years ago.

If all things were taken into consideration, the would be no loss of a win. Instead a fine would have been more appropriate in light of the fact KR dropped it and Massa was really never in serious contention.

All this could have been avoided is the appropriate penalty was applied.

What a fine? Where is he precedenet of the FIA issuing fines for infringements that affect the outcome of a race?

Thats right. A fine. Why do i have to keep repeating myself with you?

What about the precedent of the FIA fixing races as if it were a cheap two-bit WWF wrestling match?

There were people who did not want LH to win.

Rather, these people wanted FM, to be up on wins 5-4 against LH.

2 points behind.

Infront of the tifosi.

In a Ferrari

At Monza!

That suits the script much better.

Youre a fool if you think that isnt happening.

There are millions more people that will tune in to Monza because of all the bullshit that went on last weekend.

My question to you Roy, is simple.

What will the effect of millions more people tuning in be and who will it benefit?

It was a simple question. Where is the precedent for a fine for driving infringemetns that influence the outcome of a race? FIA have been pretty consistant at issuing a drive thru for such acts.

What you pose is if i was to kill my neighbour ten minutes before winning lotto, i shouldnt go to jail because i now have more to lose. But wait, the autopsy just revealed the guy was going to die of a serious illness within a day or so anyway, so because i have just had a big win with lotto and have more to lose then the the rest of the guys in the street....i should just pay a fine?

It was a simple question. Where is the precedent for a fine for driving infringemetns that influence the outcome of a race? FIA have been pretty consistant at issuing a drive thru for such acts.

What you pose is if i was to kill my neighbour ten minutes before winning lotto, i shouldnt go to jail because i now have more to lose. But wait, the autopsy just revealed the guy was going to die of a serious illness within a day or so anyway, so because i have just had a big win with lotto and have more to lose then the the rest of the guys in the street....i should just pay a fine?

Lol, a bit of an extreme analogy but i can see where youre coming from.

Have we not already established the punishment did not fit the crime?

Even the great majority of people in the paddock including the drivers agreed.

rain... really?

it hasnt rained at monza since... well... it hasnt rained at monza

Yeah and the best part is the stewards cant control the weather.

LH and KR will be in their elements...FM will flounder if the forecast is correct.

By the way, even if a fine was too "lenient", taking into account we agree LH deserved a penalty at all, a grid demotion for Monza would be the next option.

That way we could all witness LH carving the field up in the wet.

Noone doubts his wet weather ability.

I am all for a more equitable solution. But what is it? I cant see how a fine does the job. If the precedent is set for a fine then watch out when drivers start cutting chicanes, gain track position to have a dive at the next corner not concerned about the $10,000 fine.

Plus, fining McLaren would introduce another type of precedent for this sort of penalty. The point is, the FIA applied the std penalty for the offence he was deemed to have committed. What you suggest introduces another level of subjectivity, surely not a good thing. Black / white, means penalty A or B works best.

A starting grid penalty, isnt that the domain for driving infringements during practice, qualifying and engines etc?

I am all for a more equitable solution. But what is it? I cant see how a fine does the job. If the precedent is set for a fine then watch out when drivers start cutting chicanes, gain track position to have a dive at the next corner not concerned about the $10,000 fine.

See theres the thing! More drivers taking risks, having a go. Bloody oath. Lessen the penalty and we, the fans, will benefit massively from an huge increase in racing.

I love the idea.

Plus, fining McLaren would introduce another type of precedent for this sort of penalty. The point is, the FIA applied the std penalty for the offence he was deemed to have committed. What you suggest introduces another level of subjectivity, surely not a good thing. Black / white, means penalty A or B works best.

Roy, there are already way too many regulations in place. I think the noose needs to be loosened so we can enjoy the sport more, drivers too.

A starting grid penalty, isnt that the domain for driving infringements during practice, qualifying and engines etc?

Do you think those are the only times a penalty like that should apply or would you like to see the faster drivers coming through the field?

Mixing up the grid would help many things.

Stripping a race away from a driver after everyone has gone home helps no one.

Besides, the camp is split anyway as to whether or not LH did commit anything.

Subjectivity at its best.

Then we have the precedent of what happened after...

Horrible all round.

Noone can agree on the crime plus the penalty was massively unfair.

Seems most drivers are standing by the stewards on this one..

http://en.f1-live.com/f1/en/headlines/news...911191346.shtml

Jarno, Fisi, Fernando, Seb Bourdais, Nico and others..

Yeah, but what the hell would a bunch of F1 drivers know....Nothing, just ask Adam.

If all things were taken into consideration, the would be no loss of a win. Instead a fine would have been more appropriate in light of the fact KR dropped it and Massa was really never in serious contention.

All this could have been avoided is the appropriate penalty was applied.

The first line quoted is absolutely idiotic.

The appropriate penalty for gaining an advantage was applied. The fact that it cost LH a win is his bad luck.

Thats right. A fine. Why do i have to keep repeating myself with you?

Because you keep making ridiculous arguments.

As for your replies in bold to Troy's post, you have just finished saying that you believe the FIA are manipulating things to make it more of a spectacle for the fans, yet you want them to change the way penalties are applied so that we can watch faster cars having to make their way through the field...So it's ok for them to manipulate races as long as it suits you?

Yeah, but what the hell would a bunch of F1 drivers know....Nothing, just ask Adam.

The first line quoted is absolutely idiotic.

The appropriate penalty for gaining an advantage was applied. The fact that it cost LH a win is his bad luck.

Because you keep making ridiculous arguments.

As for your replies in bold to Troy's post, you have just finished saying that you believe the FIA are manipulating things to make it more of a spectacle for the fans, yet you want them to change the way penalties are applied so that we can watch faster cars having to make their way through the field...So it's ok for them to manipulate races as long as it suits you?

Yeah i dont really care so much if we dont agree.

So you dont think the FIA have manipulating anything? :)

The very least they could do is modify the rules to keep that thing we tune in to week after week consistent - the action - not the conspiracies.

What point is there in strangling a guy for making a wicked move to take the lead? Are you not the same guy who was bitching in the past about there being no overtaking in F1 any more?

You should run for PM, Dezz.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The other problem was one of those "oh shit we are going to die moments". Basically the high spec Q50s have a full electric steering rack, and the povo ones had a regular hydraulic rack with an electric pump.  So couple of laps into session 5 as I came into turn 2 (big run off now, happily), the dash turned into a christmas tree and the steering became super heavy and I went well off. I assumed it was a tyre failure so limped to the pits, but everything was OK. But....the master warning light was still on so I checked the DTCs and saw – C13E6 “Heat Protection”. Yes, that bloody steering rack computer sitting where the oil cooler should be has its own sensors and error logic, and decided I was using the steering wheel too much. I really appreciated the helpful information in the manual (my bold) POSSIBLE CAUSE • Continuing the overloading steering (Sports driving in the circuit etc,) “DATA MONITOR” >> “C/M TEMPERATURE”. The rise of steering force motor internal temperature caused the protection function to operate. This is not a system malfunction. INSPECTION END So, basically the electric motor in the steering rack got to 150c, and it decided to shut down without warning for my safety. Didn't feel safe. Short term I'll see if I can duct some air to that motor (the engine bay is sealed pretty tight). Long term, depending on how often this happens, I'll look into swapping the povo spec electric/hydraulic rack in. While the rack should be fine the power supply to the pump will be a pain and might be best to deal with it when I add a PDM.
    • And finally, 2 problems I really need to sort.  Firstly as Matt said the auto trans is not happy as it gets hot - I couldn't log the temps but the gauge showed 90o. On the first day I took it out back in Feb, because the coolant was getting hot I never got to any auto trans issues; but on this day by late session 3 and then really clearly in 4 and 5 as it got hotter it just would not shift up. You can hear the issue really clearly at 12:55 and 16:20 on the vid. So the good news is, literally this week Ecutek finally released tuning for the jatco 7 speed. I'll have a chat to Racebox and see what they can do electrically to keep it cooler and to get the gears, if anything. That will likely take some R&D and can only really happen on track as it never gets even warm with road use. I've also picked up some eye wateringly expensive Redline D6 ATF to try, it had the highest viscosity I could find at 100o so we will see if that helps (just waiting for some oil pan gaskets so I can change it properly). If neither of those work I need to remove the coolant/trans interwarmer and the radiator cooler and go to an external cooler....somewhere.....(goodbye washer reservoir?), and if that fails give up on this mad idea and wait for Nissan to release the manual 400R
    • So, what else.... Power. I don't know what it is making because I haven't done a post tune dyno run yet; I will when I get a chance. It was 240rwkw dead stock. Conclusion from the day....it does not need a single kw more until I sort some other stuff. It comes on so hard that I could hear the twin N1 turbos on the R32 crying, and I just can't use what it has around a tight track with the current setup. Brakes. They are perfect. Hit them hard all day and they never felt like having an issue; you can see in the video we were making ground on much lighter cars on better tyres under brakes. They are standard (red sport) calipers, standard size discs in DBA5000 2 piece, Winmax pads and Motul RBF600 fluid, all from Matty at Racebrakes Sydney. Keeping in mind the car is more powerful than my R32 and weighs 1780, he clearly knows his shit. Suspension. This is one of the first areas I need to change. It has electronically controlled dampers from factory, but everything is just way too soft for track work even on the hardest setting (it is nice when hustling on country roads though). In particular it rolls into oversteer mid corner and pitches too much under hard braking so it becomes unstable eg in the turn 1 kink I need to brake early, turn through the kink then brake again so I don't pirouette like an AE86. I need to get some decent shocks with matched springs and sway bars ASAP, even if it is just a v1 setup until I work out a proper race/rally setup later. Tyres. I am running Yoko A052 in 235/45/18 all round, because that was what I could get in approximately the right height on wheels I had in the shed (Rays/Nismo 18x8 off the old Leaf actually!). As track tyres they are pretty poor; I note GTSBoy recently posted a porker comparo video including them where they were about the same as AD09.....that is nothing like a top line track tyre. I'll start getting that sorted but realistically I should get proper sized wheels first (likely 9.5 +38 front and 11 +55 at the rear, so a custom order, and I can't rotate them like the R32), then work out what the best tyre option is. BTW on that, Targa Tas had gone to road tyres instead of semi slicks now so that is a whole other world of choices to sort. Diff. This is the other thing that urgently needs to be addressed. It left massive 1s out of the fish hook all day, even when I was trying not too (you can also hear it reving on the video, and see the RPM rising too fast compared to speed in the data). It has an open diff that Infiniti optimistically called a B-LSD for "Brake Limited Slip Diff". It does good straight line standing start 11s but it is woeful on the track. Nismo seem to make a 2 way for it.
    • Also, I logged some data from the ECU for each session (mostly oil pressures and various temps, but also speed, revs etc, can't believe I forgot accelerator position). The Ecutek data loads nicely to datazap, I got good data from sessions 2, 3 and 4: https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-2?log=0&data=7 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-3?log=0&data=6 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-4?log=0&data=6 Each session is cut into 3 files but loaded together, you can change between them in the top left. As the test sessions are mostly about the car, not me, I basically start by checking the oil pressure (good, or at least consistent all day). These have an electrically controlled oil pump which targets 25psi(!) at low load and 50 at high. I'm running a much thicker oil than recommended by nissan (they said 0w20, I'm running 10w40) so its a little higher. The main thing is that it doesn't drop too far, eg in the long left hand fish hook, or under brakes so I know I'm not getting oil surge. Good start. Then Oil and Coolant temp, plus intercooler and intake temps, like this: Keeping in mind ambient was about 5o at session 2, I'd say the oil temp is good. The coolant temp as OK but a big worry for hot days (it was getting to 110 back in Feb when it was 35o) so I need to keep addressing that. The water to air intercooler is working totally backwards where we get 5o air in the intake, squish/warm it in the turbos (unknown temp) then run it through the intercoolers which are say 65o max in this case, then the result is 20o air into the engine......the day was too atypical to draw a conclusion on that I think, in the united states of freedom they do a lot of upsizing the intercooler and heat exchanger cores to get those temps down but they were OK this time. The other interesting (but not concerning) part for me was the turbo speed vs boost graph: I circled an example from the main straight. With the tune boost peaks at around 18psi but it deliberately drops to about 14psi at redline because the turbos are tiny - they choke at high revs and just create more heat than power if you run them hard all the way. But you can also see the turbo speed at the same time; it raises from about 180,000rpm to 210,000rpm which the boost falls....imagine the turbine speed if they held 18psi to redline. The wastegates are electrically controlled so there is a heap of logic about boost target, actual boost, delta etc etc but it all seems to work well
    • hahah when youtube subscribers are faster than my updates here. Yes some vid from the day is up, here:  Note that as with all track day videos it is boring watching after the bloopers at the start.  The off was a genuine surprise to me, I've literally done a thousand laps around the place and I've never had instability there; basically it rolled into oversteer, slipped, gripped and spat me out. On the way off I mowed down one of the instructor's cones and it sat there all day looking at me with accusing cone eyes as I drove past. 1:13:20 was my fastest lap, and it was in the second session, 3rd lap.  It (or me!) got slower throughout the day as it got hotter.      
×
×
  • Create New...