Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys, my friend is thinking of selling his 89 model skyline, but does not know what that market value is and does not know where to start. here are his specs

R32 Gtst, Dec 1989. type M turbo.

5speed

wine red

132,000kms

after market exhaust

steering wheel

shift nob

bov

suspension

and a couple of other things i cant remember

its just been detailed and re-registerd

its interior is pretty good, not A1, but good.

i told him he could get about $12,000 to $15,000?

what do you guys rekon?

cheers, Dave

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/19991-expression-of-interest-89r32/
Share on other sites

seeing as 89 models like that are going to be less than $10k landed next year.. he would be lucky to get that amount.. however if he gets in quick might be able to get that price before the end of the year.

also, im really smart, i forgot to add the more important parts lol...well, he forgot to tell me n e way..

its also got a bodykit? no idea what sort..

and big FMIC and wheels....does that help its value?

any info would help....i told him about what u said for 10k...he is now depressed lol.

Ryan: you can buy them now in Japan from $7k and upwards. Prestige had a worked R32 GTST with an RB26DETT for $12K

Selling now is a good idea - just remember, if you buy an 89 model in Japan cheap to avoid compliance, you need to wait until January 2004 to bring it over

well u see that is base on "the laws not changing", lets just hope the gov r stupid dogs, and will leave it as it is. WIth the new compliencing scheme. r32, silvia,s 180sx, 300zx. will be everyone at next to nothing prices. but the quality of some of the cars are ...... not great. Sell the r32 now just to be safe i reckon. i doubt the prices will increase for 92 models. r33 and r34 'might' increase if compliencing plates become a scarce thing.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...