Jump to content
SAU Community

The Skyline and HP...... debate and comment (PLEASE NO MUD SLINGING)


Recommended Posts

Greg from Flatout karts GTiR ran a 1.4 60 footer at the plex with an exhaust change only but got to 3rd gear and the box broke.

GTRs and EVOs seem to be the only 4wds with a half decent gear box. Every time i run my GTiR i have every thing crossed hoping the box won't die even tho its the close ratio rally box.

R33s are to big to be a strip monster but they are a quickish car thats easy to live with and don't sound like water cooled VWs.

  • Replies 126
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Exactly DCIEVE...... consistancy.... the R33 all with similar mods seem to be over over the shop with times.... I would love to see quicker times out of R33 (my favorite line), hense the reason of the thread....

Does anyone know that the stock turbo can flow on the r33 (eg what is its CFM - Cubic Feet per Minute of flow)......

Daniel

hahahahah steve .....

GTiR are awesome cars, love these pulsars on steriods. Is the gearbox in them the limiting factor as well. Do they run the same sr20 motor as the s13/14/15. Dont they have a quad throttle body setup?

And Steve, some of prefer the lumpy sound of the water cooled VW's over the drony/hollow princes..... ;->

Daniel

The gearbox is very weak.I,m putting a modena box in it for next season.

The GTiR motor is an SR but has a lot better head and stronger con rods etc.My GTiR is a Dakar and ran 12.7 as a standard car with a good exhaust and a totally stuffed turbo that didn't last the first pass so it only went 20ks faster from 1/2 track to the end.

Jim richards Dakar ran 12.45.

Originally posted by rob77

got enough money together to replace the clutch and gearbox? ask denver (xrw) how many gearboxes he has chewed.

None actually..

I had the 3rd/4th gear cluster replaced to fix a crunchy syncro, and the current failure isn't the gearset at all..

a circlip that retains the centre diff has come askew and gone through the feed gears for the output shaft, taking the corner off two teeth on the output shaft gear, and ten or more corner off the feed gear..

the gearset itself has no missing teeth, just semi sad syncro's, oh and a loose nut on the end of the input shaft which was causing 5th to pop out all the time..

And that was over 2 years of giving it a hammering, and a fair slab of horse power through 4500rpm side step the clutch launches..

as for AWD taking the skill out, it doesn't, unless you know how to drive you won't get a quick time, be it drags or a motorkhana, you can be quicker than someone with 3 times the horsepower if they don't know how to peddle it to begin with..

when launching the awd makes it heaps easier, dial in revs and dump or slip it. a big power, heavy, rwd skyline on the other hand i imagine would be an absolute pain in the arse to launch. i guess this isnt really driver skill, just launching ability but its makes a huge difference at the strip. i never mentioned motorkhana's, which of course come down to driver ability more than anything else.

Rob, I know bugger all, but the whole WRX gearbox thing is so overdone (not starting a shitfight but its the same thing with LS1's and oil....). Dont listen to rumours..... :)

2 or 3 very close mates have wrx's in the 12's (one with a 12.1 and should go better with a decent drive) and not one of them has had gearbox problems. One drives his very hard, the other two drive normally.

Dan is right in saying that mod for mod WRX will probably get better times (but you cant compare apples to oranges).

I'm not biased in any way either. Both are awesome cars when set up right

Cheers

Mat

The only thing making a wrx fast is the 4wd launch, I think a rolling start between a wrx and a r33 would be interesting, stock ones. I think if I had the choice between a wrx and a GTR I'd take the GTR, with the r32 being quite cheap now and I've seen 95-97 r33's from $40k.

The guy who used to work at Fremantle Bob Janes (until it closed) had a WRX that ran 12.02..... and he was telling me he has been through 2 gearboxes in that thing.

They are still awesome cars. If you really want bang for buck you cant beat a 2 litre Silvia/180... Those things fly with FMIC, exhaust and boost control.... but lack the class of a line or WRX :)

Originally posted by Strich9ine

Ben,

was that WRX white ? with goodies like FMIC, stickers down the doors and a GT wing ?

if so, he now works at rocko bob jane :)

Yeah thats him. His names Brad. Hes from down Albany i think. Has had bunnies splatted in that FMIC hehe

Dan - you started the thread by saying that everyone seems to go for HP figures and not much else and asking what else people think should be done..

By saying upgrade the turbo and the ecu you're pretty much following the crowd.. which I thought the point of this thread was to throw some new ideas in?

Cam - i think the turbo is what MOST PEOPLE touch last. Out of all the R33 out there I bet less than 5% have modified/or complete aftermarket turbos. Most would be stock.

What I'm saying( and I may not be right, its just a opinion)... Is i would buy the Garret TURBO first (after full exhaust of course), and not waste my time on safc, ecbs, massive front mounts, etc. I would do zorst and turbo first then ecu. With those mods and putting a little boost and putting a cheap fuel regulator on (i think they can be had for < $150) you would be into the 12's easy (even on stock ecu) - if thats what you wanted, and some suspension parts and you also have a great handler as well as a straight line monster.

I think the biggest mistake is people are trying to overcomplicate things.

So my mod path would be...

1. full xzorts

2. garret turbo

3. fuel regulator (cheap way of leaning out fuel)

Daniel

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
×
×
  • Create New...