Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

No problem, you'd really need a ECU mate.

Its pretty much the first cab off the rank for mods.

FMIC offers no real performance gain until you upgrade turbo IMO.

Just adds a bit of lag, noticeable or not depends on many factors.

and it makes the car look uber cool LOL

IMO, I would invest in a decent turbo back exhaust system than an FMIC, invest in putting back the stock airbox with the snout and getting a decent panel filter, and maybe re enforce the stock rubber intake pipe.

Mods with gains.

IMO, I would invest in a decent turbo back exhaust system than an FMIC, invest in putting back the stock airbox with the snout and getting a decent panel filter, and maybe re enforce the stock rubber intake pipe.

Mods with gains.

Yep, i agree 110% with all that.

Least there is return on investment other than looks

I can't believe I forgot the exhaust!

I have a full 3" turbo-back Fujitsubo exhaust. The pod filter is enclosed in a heatshield (compatible with the stock snorkel). How could I re-enforce the intake pipe? I was thinking of getting a shorter alloy pipe.

Is it really necessary to upgrade the ECU if i'm planning on getting an FMIC?

Thanks.

The ecu will change your fuel maps, timing etc, get the most out of what you have.. You will get more gain out of it than a fmic alone. What might be a better option for the time being is an R34 gtt standard sidemount cooler, I'm pretty sure they are still bigger than the S2 R33s, and can be picked up fairly cheap, and you cant see them. So less chance of the police picking you up for it, and people nicking your car.

Id still go the ecu tho.

Alright, I'll put the ECU on my shopping list.

Since I'm keeping the mods fairly basic, I think I'll go for a piggy-back instead of the full one. Can anyone recommend an affordable (yet) reliable one?

I used to own a Honda Integra Type_R and I knew a lot of about ECU's for them...but very newbie here!

Thanks.

Im in the same boat...about to start to save up for a new ecu. For a brief few moments I was considering a AFC neo but after doing some reading have decided that Im better off just saving a bit longer and getting the Greddy emanage ultimate.

My mods so far are K&N panel filter (im also anti pod), 3" turbo exhaust, and EBC. The boost controller had made a hell of a difference and only running 9psi max. Can't wait to get the EMU and get a good tune!

FMIC's will not give you a horsepower gain by themselves. They will only last longer till they heat soak, and thus they will not DECREASE your performance as fast as a SMIC. Now if you have a big turbo, but couldn't crank up the boost because you heat soak your SMIC really fast, and now you can crank it up (with a tune of course), you'll get HP. O yeah, and like they said, they look cool!

With a aftermarket ECU like AEM ECU, hp gains can be up to 38rwhp

(roughly 28rwkw) with a RB25DET at the same boost level.

Here's a thread on the AEM forum about the 38rwhp gain (need to login

to view dyno chart) -

http://forum.aempower.com/forum/index.php/topic,12517.0.html

A locally made Motec ECU probably would produce similar gains

but needs an adaptor loom.

Just fitting and tuning a HKS F-con pro (similar to Motec ECU) has

seen gains of I think was 20rwkw over PowerFC on a RB26DETT.

On a 2 litre motor, podfilter has a boost gain of roughly around 0.1bar (1.47psi) and 8rwkw.

Exhaust has a boost gain of roughly around 0.2bar (2.94psi) and 18rwkw.

I noticed GTR front mount has seen gains of 18rwkw.

So 28rwkw gain with a ECU vs 18rwkw gain with a front mount intercooler.

Edited by SKYPER

Hey im currently in the same boat as well, at the moment i have a blitz pod filter and a HKS SSQV BOV, now i need is a Blitz LM cooler and a Turbo back exhaust, Where did you get your Fujitsu turbo back exhaust from?

Thanks geraus.

When i got my car 2 years ago it already came with a catback...and the i actually went fmic before any other mods solely because its more of a support/safety mod before i went to any power mods...especially with the blistering summer temps now i think its a good idea...

I'm anti-pod filter!

i couldnt agree anymore. Most pod filters under $30 bucks i found to be rubbish!!!

my first mod was a turbo upgrade :( every car needs a exhaust so that was first but i wouldnt call that a mod..

Edited by rich flavour

i did a few gtech 0-100 runs before and after my fmic installation.

there was essentially no difference in performance

however i did get maybe 200rpm more lag and seemed to have lost a bit of linearity in my power curve.

i wouldnt recommend a fmic unless you're going to use it (i didnt even up the boost...)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...