Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 268
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

yeah the cars handle much more realistically now. they don't corner like they're on rails any more, there is body roll too, and you can break glass on cars now too and they have very realistic damage. burnouts are available and also fun. yes you can shoot people, blow them up whatever.

my only criticism so far is that driving is too much towards simulation and too far from arcade style. it's really hard now to hand brake turn without loosing lots of speed, or spining into somthing. that was part of the fun of the old ones. just hop in a car and hoon off.

Sounds the GTA 4 ad adopted DRIVER car handling characteristics

Fantastic Game.. Im a bit dissappointed in some of the bugs ive Had to encounter. I really shouldnt be Restarting the Game 3 times. althought i was playing for 4 hours straight..Multiplayer was a load of Fun while It lasted for a good hour, Until the Gaming Servers where Overloaded, And no one could play.. have to say so far this game is a 9.825/10 for me.

I must add the Realisim of Doing Stand still's Is bloody impressive, didnt think so much smoke would pour out.

Try it now. Ill be surprised if its working.. It appears their is a big Controversy goin on, just checked the net. It appears loads and loads of ppl are having glitching and freezing problems. and No one can connect to Multiplayer game servers.

Rockstargames = FAIL!

yeah im loving the gps system too, great when your drinkiing :spank:

id have to agree about the cars though, you cant brake very well if you are turning and the handbrake is a mofo to control. hopefully ill get used to it

at roughly 14% now

word! brake and then turn = un saveable understeer! and handbrake and turn = massive slide and mostly a spin or huge loss of speed/time. yeah hopefully I will get used to it, but for the moment I'm crap at driving in GTA.

Gazzila, can't try it atm but I will do later on. hope they get it sorted asap. :yes:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Take the value it measured as, and pick the closest range available that is above the reading on the screen.   Also, no point just testing the coils. Read what has been said again. You need to test all your wiring, everything.
    • Does the scanner do all the CUs in the car, or only the ECU?
    • @666DAN sorry to bring you and old thread.     I've got my de+t done and it's all running great other than 1 small issue.    Car has remained auto with the na auto and tcm, I've used a stagea ecu with. NIstune board and everything is great other than my gear selection on the dash. It illuminates park, reverse, neutral, 3rd and 2nd when selected . But nothing when in  drive or what gear your in when you pop it into tiptronic. I'm sure there is maybe 1 wire in the ecu plug I need to move to rectify this. Do ya have any ideas?     Cheers man
    • Well I recently changed my rear axles and was thinking if I bumped anything, I have been driving the car for a while now though... But it has been raining today so everything is wet under the wheel arches. Brakes feel fine and can't hear any of the metal screamers, I had a squeak coming from one of the handbrake drums but that seems to have gone away a while ago. I was going down a hill when it lit up and I did feel the abs bite for a second and question why it did it?
    • Correct. Um. I dunno. I haven't cared enough about the way that the NA cars work to know for sure. But..... The 33/34 turbo manual cars have an electronic speed sensor in the gearbox that outputs a +/- (ie, sawtooth AC) voltage signal. That is connected to the speedo. The speedo then outputs a 0-5v square wave (ie, PWM) signal that the ECU (and any other CU on the bus) sees. The speed sensor is NOT directly connected to the ECU. So here's the problem. Your new ECU expects to see the PWM signal, but must somehow be getting a direct signal from the diff speed sensor. Which would suggest that the wiring of the NA car is not the same as the turbo cars. I think you will need to spend some time with (hopefully the wiring diagram for the car) and a multimeter to see what is connected to what. Then, presuming I am correct**, you would then want to separate the ECU speed signal input from the rest of the car's wiring, and probably either buy a speed signal converter, or build one using an arduino (or similar). That would take in the speed sensor signal and output a scaled (and suitably rearranged) signal for the ECU. ** We shouldn't presume that I am correct here, because there might be something else crazy going on. I don't think you could convert the speedo to be fed from the gearbox sensor, because the pulse rate from that sensor is probably different to the diff sensor and then the speedo would read wrongly. And this also wouldn't fix the ECU's problem either, because the ECU doesn't want to see the gearbox signal direct either (assuming that they are all on the same wiring, for some odd NA related reason, see above caveat!) Does this help? Probably not. Can you make it work? Almost certainly. With the above work. You should buy a handheld oscilloscope from Aliexpress so that you can view these signals directly. Connect up the probes and drive the car. Show photos of the screen when drving at known speeds and connected to different places, and we'll see what we can learn about it.
×
×
  • Create New...