Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 268
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

yeah the cars handle much more realistically now. they don't corner like they're on rails any more, there is body roll too, and you can break glass on cars now too and they have very realistic damage. burnouts are available and also fun. yes you can shoot people, blow them up whatever.

my only criticism so far is that driving is too much towards simulation and too far from arcade style. it's really hard now to hand brake turn without loosing lots of speed, or spining into somthing. that was part of the fun of the old ones. just hop in a car and hoon off.

Sounds the GTA 4 ad adopted DRIVER car handling characteristics

Fantastic Game.. Im a bit dissappointed in some of the bugs ive Had to encounter. I really shouldnt be Restarting the Game 3 times. althought i was playing for 4 hours straight..Multiplayer was a load of Fun while It lasted for a good hour, Until the Gaming Servers where Overloaded, And no one could play.. have to say so far this game is a 9.825/10 for me.

I must add the Realisim of Doing Stand still's Is bloody impressive, didnt think so much smoke would pour out.

Try it now. Ill be surprised if its working.. It appears their is a big Controversy goin on, just checked the net. It appears loads and loads of ppl are having glitching and freezing problems. and No one can connect to Multiplayer game servers.

Rockstargames = FAIL!

yeah im loving the gps system too, great when your drinkiing :spank:

id have to agree about the cars though, you cant brake very well if you are turning and the handbrake is a mofo to control. hopefully ill get used to it

at roughly 14% now

word! brake and then turn = un saveable understeer! and handbrake and turn = massive slide and mostly a spin or huge loss of speed/time. yeah hopefully I will get used to it, but for the moment I'm crap at driving in GTA.

Gazzila, can't try it atm but I will do later on. hope they get it sorted asap. :yes:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
    • Probably not. A workshop grade scantool is my go to for proper Consult interrogation. Any workshop grade tool should do it. Just go to a workshop.
    • In my head it does make sense to be a fuel problem since that is what I touched when cleaning the system. When I was testing with the fuel pressure gauge, the pressure was constantly 2.5 bar with the FPR vacuum removed. When stalling, the pressure was going up to 3.0 bar (which is how it should be on ignition).
    • ECUtalk pages don't mention they support the ABS computer (consult port has more than one CAN), so you might just need a different scan tool. But, I would expect ABS is a different light to the brake warning/handbrake light, do you see an ABS light come on for a few seconds when you turn the key from ACC to IGN? But since you said: I'd have a look at the ABS sensors in the rear hubs to make sure they are not damaged, disconnected etc.
×
×
  • Create New...