Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

My Fitness Pal can be hard work Dan, but I agree with Troy's point about using it on a PC so you can see the nutritional value confirmed by other users. You also see a much more detailed food content breakdown.

I eat a banana every day and when I put it into my food diary I always laugh, 'banana, medium, no skin' - who the f**k eats the skin?

My Fitness Pal can be hard work Dan, but I agree with Troy's point about using it on a PC so you can see the nutritional value confirmed by other users. You also see a much more detailed food content breakdown.

I eat a banana every day and when I put it into my food diary I always laugh, 'banana, medium, no skin' - who the f**k eats the skin?

Similarly to your banana example, it isn't clear that when using "Fresh - Banana Raw" or other reliable entries whether or not you should weigh the f**king thing with the skin on or not. Weighing it without skin isn't exactly what I'd consider practical, but weighing it with the skin isn't accurate either.

If I had to do that shit on the regular I'd rant as hard as Birds did about calorie counting and would honestly just add 1 rep to everything as a calorie buffer rather than waste my time with apps like that.

As I said earlier though, you do what works for you. I do not have the patience for something like that, I'd rather just jog an extra few mins (or have another shake if I was trying to go up instead of down).

I'm a lazy kent.

I just go the banana, medium (without skin) which is the 110g one.

Bananas arent really as nutritionally good for you as I thought (105 calories, 27g carbs, 1g protein) but they satisy hunger cravings, hence why I eat them.

I I was using it on a PC, still thought it was shitty to use.

I work in IT though so I'll happily bitch about everything that isn't fully awesome.

Like most graphic user interfaces and website navigation these days! Have totally turned to shit and are NOT user friendly!

I just go the banana, medium (without skin) which is the 110g one.

Bananas arent really as nutritionally good for you as I thought (105 calories, 27g carbs, 1g protein) but they satisy hunger cravings, hence why I eat them.

Potassium and fibre, among other vital nutrients that we completely overlook when focussing on calories and macros.

If you want something filling that has barely anything to it, hit up pumpkin/butternut squash and salads more. Decided to actually measure everything I put in my salad the other night, and for something that filled me up quite well (given my appetite and stomach capacity, this is decent), it came to 66 calories LOL

Birds: Funnily enough, I tend to find that the increase in "app" development for things like phones and tablets has made developers a bit smarter at presenting info and more efficient navigation.

PC App and Web interface devs still have a ways to go.

That's just apps though; they're idiot proof and often have so little customisation/info that you can't get it wrong presenting info (some still do). Websites though, fark me they use terrible psychology in their menus and layout. It's all cluttered and overlapped in favour of looking pretty and sacrificing functionality! Bring back websites of the 90s and early 2000s where you knew where to find what you needed in two clicks.

Potassium and fibre, among other vital nutrients that we completely overlook when focussing on calories and macros.

If you want something filling that has barely anything to it, hit up pumpkin/butternut squash and salads more. Decided to actually measure everything I put in my salad the other night, and for something that filled me up quite well (given my appetite and stomach capacity, this is decent), it came to 66 calories LOL

I do eat pumpkin but not so much squash, do you put it into your salad?

I do eat pumpkin but not so much squash, do you put it into your salad?

As far as I'm concerned, it's pumpkin lol. Just technically it's apparently a squash. And yeah, I'll put it in anything and everything I think it will fit lol. Diced into small cubes, oven roasted, then ditched in salads or as a side to steaks etc.

I know right?!

worst-website-ever.jpg

Exactly what I'm talking about! In 10 seconds you've read all the relevant links to all the info you need, faster than anyone could from a modern website. It's right there, clear as crystal, in black and white. Good day sir!

Well tonight was very beneficial in terms of learning.

Working with Matt was really helpful.

Here's what he had to say.

Squat: high bar form is fine but flexibility is not great, he had me widen my stance and let my feet rotate out a bit which helped with depth, even without my block under the heels.

He said I should be aiming to low bar though as its better for an overall workout and uses more posterior muscles. I tried it and found it "interesting" he said keep practicing but said my form was fine overall, but again not great flexibility and depth.

He said ultimately I was selling myself a long way short on the weight I could be doing right now and that I was not trusting my strength enough.

Bench he said was pretty decent but wanted me to keep my elbows closer to my body. Same thing as squat about the weight, plenty more in the tank he said.

Deadlift was the main reason I went and after showing me a few things I pulled a set of 8 at 80kg with ease then did another set at 100kg. He said he was confident I could rep 120-140. I was blown away with being able to get 100 up and far easier than I thought. I believe him that I could do a few reps at 120 plus.

Maybe the most important thing I learned was a better idea of my lower back position and that I have been over compensating. When I think it's rounded it's actually very flat.

All in all money well spent.

Edited by ActionDan

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • So I'll put filler past the repair area a bit to make sure I don't miss anything. Then I'll block it until it's almost level, put the guidecoat, then keep blocking until it's gone. Then it's still wavy.  In regards to hitting the panel, I saw this video might give more context - Skip to 0:47 he knocks it down. But yeah I'm sanding until the guidecoat is gone then checking because otherwise my filler is still well above the bodyline. Unless what you're saying is I should put guidecoat around it early, surrounding the filler then stip once it's gone?
    • I refreshed the OEM injectors with the kit and connected it up. It now ideals okay even with the IACV removed. Driving still has the same cutoff issue like the 550cc injectors so the issue is somewhere else. I bought FPG's Fuel Pump Hanger. I will be installing it next, but it is not as straightforward as I thought it was with my limited wiring knowledge and no instruction on the specific model I purchased (FPG-089). I also got the incorrect billet clamp as I could not find info on the OEM sizing.
    • Stop looking at the garage floor, and turn the radio up a bit louder if there's any strange noises...
    • No. Turbo shuffle and surge/flutter are not the same thing. Specifically, on a GTR, turbo shuffle has a definite meaning. On a GTR, the twin turbos are assumed to be the same thing and to operate the same way, exactly. In reality, they do not. Their exhaust sides are fed and exhaust a little differently, to each other. Their inlet sides are fed and exhausted a little differently, to each other. Consequently, when they are "working" they are often at slightly different points on the compressor map compared to each other. What this means, particularly when coming on boost, is that one of them will spool up and start producing extra flow compared to the other, which will put back pressure on that other compressor, which will push the operating point on that other compressor up (vertically). This will generally result in it bumping up against the surge line on the map, but even if it doesn't, it upsets the compressor and you get this surging shuffle back and forth between them That is "turbo shuffle" on a GTR. It is related to other flutter effects heard on other turbo systems, but it is a particular feature of the somewhat crappy outlet piping arrangement on RB26s. There are plenty of mods that have been attempted with varying levels of success. People have ground out and/or welded more material into the twin turbo pipe to try to prevent it. Extending the divider inside it works, removing material doesn't. There are aftermarket replacement twin turbo pipes available, and these exist pretty mush purely because of this shuffle problem.
    • You can temporarily* use lock collars to keep it in place until you can do the bushes, back the nuts off, slide them in, snug back up. *temporarily is often for ever
×
×
  • Create New...