Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The importance of cardio in body recomposition! (there is none)

Leesh 8 months ago - exercised for two hours a day, 6 days a week. This daily exercise was made up of an hour's worth of gym work, an hour of cardio/ab/flexibility classes, and sometimes 20-30 minutes on the treadmill. She had been exercising this way for nearly 10 years. Combined with her healthy diet of sweet buggerall, she had a body most women would be quite happy to have:

57kg

u4hfMY3I_original.png

But Leesh wanted more muscle "definition". Her own definition (pun) of this was more muscle and less body fat. She consulted me for help. She also started dating me (awesome). I cut out most of Leesh's cardio (wanted to cull it all) and wrote her up a weight training program that consisted of 4 gym sessions per week @ ~1 hour a pop. I also upped her food intake as much as she would let me. Aside from deadlifts and squats (she only started these about 10 weeks ago), Leesh has been trying to follow the regime for around 8 months.

So now with more food, much less cardio and only 1/3 the time spent exercising, she should be muffin topping the same pants with some serious school cafeteria triceps to boot, right?

56kg

k9jNaRhG_original.png

We can't be unhappy about less work, more food, being twice as strong, and looking the same (or better IMO). For body recomposition, a little strength training is better than a shit ton of cardio.

Now, in 8 months people have achieved much more - Leesh is far from done and this isn't a PTC success story, nor is it some radical before and after. Leesh had a very good body beforehand. But, my point here is: she has given up all that cardio and is better for it. As she gets stronger, she will see more improvement in muscle size and "definition", however, I am happy with Leesh's progress given the circumstances. Unfortunately, trying to coach someone from 3000km away has some major limitations. Markos would know all too well: you can tell someone a hundred times how to do it, but until they set foot in your gym, they aren't going to do it exactly how you want. This isn't necessarily Leesh's fault - I can't be there to teach her movements, to correct technique or spot her, or tell her exactly when I think she should increase weights/reps/sets. I'm also not a professional coach and Leesh can't sleep as often as she'd like to. Some problems are on her, like the continuation of some cardio classes or not eating as much as I want her to eat - but - as Markos said, there is no point doing something if it makes you unhappy or giving up the things that do make you happy. For Leesh, these classes are important and that's fine with me. I only wanted her to understand that cardio would hinder her progress, rather than help it...that being unable to do or changing parts of a program to suit yourself is not committing 100% to the program and you are therefore not entitled to 100% of what a program promises you. Leesh is finally starting to accept this. After understanding, comes informed choice, and that is completely up to her.

It is also incredibly hard to change someone's attitude about food, given society raises us all on the overly simplistic principle of more food = fat, less food = thin. Now that Leesh is doing squats and deadlifts...and will hopefully get in a session at PTC Perth soon...I am looking forward to some good strength increases and the body shape that goes with it. Not that I am complaining about what she already has :)

tl;dr: lift heavier weights, eat lots of good food, and rest well. You'll look fantastic eventually!

Well it's good to have goals, but as was said plenty of girls would be happy to have your physique Leesh, I get the impression some of your battles are fought mentally rather than physically.

Girls tend to have a shitful self image, you may not, I'm just generalising.

Keep plugging away, you'll get stronger and in the process will have that more defined/lean/muscle look. It just takes time.

FIGJAM: Better chance getting them of Birds I'd say.

Well it's good to have goals, but as was said plenty of girls would be happy to have your physique Leesh, I get the impression some of your battles are fought mentally rather than physically.

Girls tend to have a shitful self image, you may not, I'm just generalising.

Keep plugging away, you'll get stronger and in the process will have that more defined/lean/muscle look. It just takes time.

You'd be right Dan :(

Overall I'm feeling disillusioned and I know it takes time, but how much time?

Well I see it a bit differently.

My "plan" is to just keep plugging away getting stronger over time until such point as I either get injured or too old to maintain that weight then I'll gradually reduce the weight but continue exercising, MY point being I do not feel like I'll ever "get" to anywhere in particular, rather than I'll be exercising for most of my life because I enjoy it, it makes me feel good, look decent, helps me lift heavy things, work on the car, etc.

For me it's not a process with one goal in mind, it's a life style choice. I've taken time off before, well over a year to let things heal up, persue other interests for a while etc and that will probably happen again, but ultimately I always see myself doing some form of exercise.

Foir you, well you have some kind of look in mind obviously so you will be "done" when you get there and then you need to maintain it.

How long will that take? That's determined by your commitment and determination.

About twice the length from the starting point to about the middle...

EDIT: As for being disillusioned, when I hit a mental wall, I change something. Add weight, new exercise, move exercise around, buy a new gym shirt, take a full week off (you should not overlook the need to do this every now and then anyway).

Then come back refreshed.

Edited by ActionDan

You'd be right Dan :(

Overall I'm feeling disillusioned and I know it takes time, but how much time?

average age of the winners of Mr Olympia is 33 years old.

in short it can take a long time and it is something you can work at for your entire life.

Dan, It's a lifestyle choice for me too. I've grown up with fitness and exercise as my mum is a PT and Les Mills instructor, and as mentioned before I've been exercising for 10 years. This last 8 months has been a big change for me and at times I've felt a bit on my own. During the past year and a half I've also had significant personal challenges to overcome coupled with giving up my own exercise routine that was my comfort zone, and making changes to my diet; increasing food intake which has its own mental challenges.

Changing my ways isn't easy but I'm doing it for the bigger picture. I don't have a particular image that I think, "when I look like that I've achieved my goal." I just feel frustrated that I haven't seen physically and strength wise what I thought I would see in 8 months is all. But I know I need to continue squats and deadlifts for longer to see change. Hopefully in another 8 months I'll be happier than I am now.

Edited by L33SH

Sorry wasn't implying that this was a fad for you, just saying for me it's a lifestyle thing, if it is for you too then you will always be fine :)

I think I mentioned before, 8mths is not much, and I know that sounds harsh, but it;s been 8mths of decent effort not 8mths of balls (ovaries to the wayy) out and out 110% dedication to strength gains. Whcih is completely fine, I personally don't train that way so it would be remiss of me to give you a hard time. Just saying that realistically you have a ways to go (which is why I like build threads).

I looked back on my build thread yesterday to see where I started out when I began project squat dodger/no more curling like a bro. It's been good so far, squatting 3 times a week, haven't curled in ages, getting stronger across the board. Only small gains, but gains all the same.

Keep at it and if you can get into a PTC and do a session or two, that was a ral turning point for me, so much so that I consider myself having only been going at it since that time, the time before that was just treading water.

Yeah easy for me to say when I could go see Matt on the way home from work so do the PTC one when convenient, maybe when next in Melbs? You and le Birds could head out and see Markos for some confidence crushing tuition. (I'm joking Markos relax).

Start a build thread only if you want one, otherwise it'll be just another annoyance, I'm pretty verbose and I like to dataz so being able to look back and go lol 40kg squat, or hopefully in another year lol 100kg squat is good for me.

Edited by ActionDan

I'd need to go sooner rather than later as I'm still unconfident with deadlift technique, not in Melbourne til at least October so I will look at going to Perth at some stage.

I don't really know about a build thread, my increases are so small I feel as if I'd be writing in the same numbers every week. Take bench for example, which I've been doing for 8 months. Started at 30kg and I'm now at 40kg, not really much increase for 8 months yet I try to up the weight most sessions.

As I said, up to you, if you look at mine there has been weeks of the same numbers but I also talk about physio visits, walking/running at some points, etc etc just so I have a record.

So you've increased your bench by 33% and that makes you unhappy? So at 57kg you were benching 52% of your BW, and are now benching 71% of your BW at 56kg, so you got lighter AND stronger...

Tough crowd...

Like I said, I think some of your bigger hurdles are up stairs girlfriend *snaps fingers* but I don't know you and it's not my place to make judgment calls so take all my ramblings with a grain of salt (or some cheese and crackers!).

Edited by ActionDan

All that and the part you focused on was about the build thread.

And what is, the 50s were a girl can't make her own choice?

My 2 cents, don't do one, you;re not interested in it so it won't serve you any benefit. Put your time into things that have a positive impact for you.

Like 33% bench improvements!

all it will do Leesh is act as a diary for working out.

wont make you lift more or less, wont change how your body looks. It is just one of many places where you could store some information about your progress.

If you look at my build it is full of garble.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • This is for an RB20DET. Sorry for not including that. 
    • Welp, this is where my compression lands after my rebuild. Thoughts? I have ~6 hours on the motor. 
    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
×
×
  • Create New...