Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have the worst diet imaginable. Maybe it is why I always feel flat, wake up in the morning tired and what not.

Never really considered diet to play a large roll on energy levels, obviously some but not large. I know when i was eating and drinking a lot last year I barely noticed any strength gains

Mitch, youre taking the piss

Food is our petrol, the better quality petrol you stick in your car the better it runs

I'm surprised how little most understand about food, lifting weights gets all the attention because magazines show guys training. How boring if they just showed pics of guys eating porridge

It will be interesting to see what happens with my diet As I am short and stocky. I used to eat 2 pieces of toast for breakfast half afoot long sub for smoko and other half for lunch than a shake in the arv than tea at night. Now I have 4 pieces of toast. Whole grain of course as well as protein shake 2 scoops . Still half a sub for smoko and lunch but I have double chicken ( whole grain again ) in the afternoon I have 2 scoops protein and 1 of carbs and the same after a work out and than tea is steak/chicken with sweet potato and veges. It's making me so damn full lol

Mitch, youre taking the piss

Food is our petrol, the better quality petrol you stick in your car the better it runs

I'm surprised how little most understand about food, lifting weights gets all the attention because magazines show guys training. How boring if they just showed pics of guys eating porridge

Are there many types of food that you've noticed will almost always cause a reduction in performance? Of course we need to eat the right foods to grow and have energy, but say if we ate certain things ON TOP of the good stuff, would anything send us backwards?

I ask this because sometimes depending on what I've eaten through the day, I'll actually feel worse when it comes to training time than if I ate nothing at all. Might be entirely mental, but hell I figure it can't hurt asking :P

Oh look it's the PWO argument again...didn't we do this a few months ago?

PWOs hey...do they work? Yes. Would two cups of coffee and some speed do the same thing? Probably. Do you need them? No.

My gym gives me sachets of them for free and I keep storing them in my closet for that rainy day when I want to be just like my weak friends with terrible diets and sleep, who for some reason won't stop recommending that I replicate their workout habits, such as taking PWOs for that buzz when you're benching 80kg.

It's a bandaid; go get some stitches. Not healthy to be tricking the body into thinking it has more energy than it does, IMO. Not on any sort of regular anyway.

If your looking at what to avoid eating, look no further than Kens diet

No preperation or effort, very typical diet for the average guy who thinks hes eating well. You have no idea how many people join the gym and tell me they eat well and describe the same diet.

I think bacon and eggs for breakfast, with porridge if you really want to get big, washed down with milk

Lean protein with rice and veg for next few meals, have some fruit with your last meal before training, a protein drink and a banana 5 minutes before you finish, steak and loads of veg, including potato for dinner, cottage cheese before bed.

A bit of effort, but awesome results. I have the proof in my gym.

If you want supplements, add BCAA's and Glutamine in your post workout drink

While I agree with exactly what you said Markos, I think you misinterpreted my question - are there foods that will NEGATIVELY affect performance, even if every dietary requirement has already been met? Let's say you wrote me a comprehensive diet plan that covered every bit of nutrition my body needs. Now, assuming I adhered to it 100% (in the sense that I didn't skip anything), are there any types of food that when added to this already comprehensive diet would actually be taking steps backwards when it came to performance? Perhaps something that will hinder optimal function in some way....like excessive sodium perhaps?

I thought you were against fruit in the afternoon and eating rice etc unless bulking Markos?

I've started eating 2 x burgers with decent protein content first thing (plain because I like them like that, usually Kangaroo or the sphincter of the universe), banana + protein shake @ 9am, lean meat like chicken breast or beef/tomato/beans + veg for lunch, protein shake at 3.30pm, protein shake post workout, then most nights steak + veg followed by a Chobani yogurt for dinner.

I skip the potato / bread etc for the most part.

I could eat more meat, but I'm struggling eating it 3 times a day as it is!

Not taking the piss, I have never really thought about it also to add some weight to the PWO argument, I have only ever had a couple of good workouts with them.

I really need to sort my diet and workout properly and put some more effort into it.

One thing I've noticed is that the lifters on this forum are generally of about the same stage of lifting as when my earlier newsletters came out, so the information is quite relevant.

Now that was 5 years ago, where the strongest lifter that ever joined my gym was squatting 130kg. The majority of my clients were novices, but I remember 3 strongish guys joining who could squat 130kg, back in 2008/2009, Nick, Kelly and Alen.

Now that you need to squat double that to simply make our Top 5, information has changed a little. Simply to make our Top 10 Bench list you need over 155kg, thats a paused in competition bench, I dont rank gym lifts.

In another 5 years things for my current clients could well be different again. From what I gather the majority of you guys havent cleared 140/100/180 kg yet, thats pretty much what I have always determined a novice to be.

When I started lifting in the 1980's, it was in pounds, 300/200/400 (137/91/181)

Anything beneath that means in lifting terms you are still a novice, thats how I've always ranked my lifters. If anyone thinks thats harsh, our youngest to best that is 14yo Liam Pannel, at 81kg he has performed 170/110/200 and our lightest is Jesse at 66kg and 19.

So regardless how long you've trained, when you join PTC, if you cant hit those weights, youre a Novice.

Interestingly enough a new guy, Gavin has just joined. He has competed in BB shows, now wants to PL, will be interesting to see how he goes.

So back to the info on the early newsletters, its very relevant to lots on here. From what I can tell, besides the guys from my gym that post on here, only Rev beats all those lifts. I'm sorry if I missed anyone.

I can do the squat and bench, but my deadlift is ~90-110kg, which is partly why I'm starting your beginner program and eating more (that and realising that bodypart split training is not going to get me where I want to go very effectively).

Should I do SLDL, RDL or regular deadlifts to try and fix that? Or like with most of it, it does not matter as long as I am doing some form of deadlift more than once a week?

Back when I did parallel squats, my squat would have passed the 140, but I've still got a bit to go before my ATG gets there. Bench and deadlift are in the clear.

I don't think the numbers are too harsh, personally, given I'm a slender 80kg @ 6'3 and have technically achieved them...in a commercial gym environment...without engaging in proper strength training...or even having a good diet. Just need the three simultaneously!

Fair to say that, as your lifters have progressed, obviously your standards have at the same time, so I'd expect the numbers to shift in the future as the bell curve itself does. If we could go back in time a few years I'd be one of the strongest at PTC lol

Boz, if youre pulling 110kg I doubt your doing a legal 140kg squat. Now I may be wrong, but I've never seen that and I'm 51, you may be the first.

Birds, absolutely 5 years ago you would have been one of the strongest at PTC. Back then Kelly Chan was the man, 130 squat, 140 bench,200 dead. A year later he went 175 squat, 160 bench and 245 deadlift. He lifted in the 82.5kg class. Now my best 82.5kg lifter goes 255/160/290.

So thats why my information is now a little different.

Boz, if youre pulling 110kg I doubt your doing a legal 140kg squat. Now I may be wrong, but I've never seen that and I'm 51, you may be the first.

Birds, absolutely 5 years ago you would have been one of the strongest at PTC. Back then Kelly Chan was the man, 130 squat, 140 bench,200 dead. A year later he went 175 squat, 160 bench and 245 deadlift. He lifted in the 82.5kg class. Now my best 82.5kg lifter goes 255/160/290.

So thats why my information is now a little different.

I don't know what the 'rules' are, but Ive done a set of 10 at 140 and below parallel. So have my training partners. I've done 1 at 170kg once too, but don't know if I could replicate it. I was regularly doing 120 x 10 x 4 until I started doing 20 x 100 sets the other week.

That was with the pussy pad, in a power rack, I didn't pause at the bottom if you're meant to do that if that's what you're getting at. FWIW I leg press 260kg if that can be compared.

I've got no reason to talk my lifts up to anyone, and it baffles the shit out of me that I'm so stuck on deadlifts comparatively. Maybe my form is just that shithouse - I did have a lot of trouble with grip strength until very recently as well.

Started your beginners program tonight, it was quite the workout! Ended up doing the SLDLs @ 70kg.

Edited by bozodos

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...