Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I think people give way too much attention to those beginner numbers, taking them the wrong way and out of context. Not that they aren't a good goal for anyone to achieve, regardless of why they are in the gym, but it doesn't mean you can't achieve what you set out to do without obtaining them. Afterall, they are only based on three exercises.

I had what many would call a decent body before I ever even did a squat or a deadlift. I'm sure Dan did too, because we both worked most of our muscles with different exercises (including lots of isolation) anyway. 2 years ago I gave no fks for being that strong, as long as I looked good. It's still largely the case, but I figure now that as long as I'm in the gym staying good looking (:)), I might as well aim for something at the same time. It's fun increasing the numbers on the three lifts and I am getting some decent legs now to make my appearance more proportionate. I'm also a convert of the efficiency of compound movements, now that I see I can spend 4 hours a week in the gym for a better looking body than 6 hours a week.

Y'all need to understand that, regardless of clients, powerlifter or non, Markos believes in strength training as ultimate (efficiency and usefulness) for achieving any goals regardless of why you're in the gym; that anyone can benefit from it, whether you want to be strong, maintain a healthy lifestyle, play a sport or just look good. It's sound logic, as he has the results to back it up, be it big numbers or pictures of people or employed by a sporting club. Therefore, he's going to have a bench mark in the 3 major lifts that are quintessential to a sport based on strength training, and apply them to any situation. Now they were originally created as an expectation for people looking to get strong - it just happens that they are useful too, should you want to build yourself a good looking body. So let's not forget the roots of the expectations and the person who created them: it's powerlifting and strength training, but they are useful for anything.

You don't need to take offence to them if you haven't made them yet - you can get a good body without training to these numbers; you don't even have to do the exercises. But is there anyone here who isn't training bench/squats/deads? Is it so bad to have higher expectations than what the rest of society does? Anyone who disagrees with the numbers is forgetting that they are simply the benchmark of a trainer, created for his clients and anyone who wants to listen to him. Don't get caught up in the numbers if you don't like them; they will probably be changing soon anyway, to accommodate higher expectations. But you can't really disagree with them. It's a bit of a contradiction if you do.

I'm in for most of that. I was more defined with isolation exercises, but I'm stronger and a bit larger now and I think my physique is more balanced than it was more beef on legs and back, and if you recall that was the point of my very first thread in here, balancing out my home gym routine.

And yes, I was not training those 3 lifts initially, but I feel better for doing it now, regardless of numbers.

I think the absolute biggest issue is people have forgotten what gyms are intended for, or that "weight training" is actually called progressive resistance training.

Most gym users are what we call mouth breathers. We feel most waste their time in the gym. The only difference with us is we follow progressive resistance training and we teach proper technique. Not what PT's call proper technique, but proper lifting technique.

So some of our clients want to compete in powerlifting, the most accessible strength sport. Whether your in the PL section or not, progressive resistance is the aim.

Injury. I've had many come for injury rehab, namely backs. Wayne has fallen off ladders and broken his back twice. He was a mess, at 40 years old he couldnt pick anything up. His wife was training at PTC and she suggested he try it and see if I could help him. That was late 2010. At 43yo Wayne now deadlifts 240kg, squats 200kg and benches 135kg. Back is good.

Ryan had been seeing a chiro/physio twice a week for years. He is a builder, in his early 30's. His whole family trains at PTC, sister, brother, brother in law, sister in law etc. They talked him into coming in. He deadlifts 250kg now.

Obviously over the past 5 1/2 years there are many more, but you get the idea.

I can see why most think its a PL gym, I dont talk about the regular gym clients as I dont find what they do exciting, not exciting enough to talk about on a forum. By years end I'll have 3 clients deadlift 300kg, I have 2 so far. Thats exciting.

As far as physiques go, even though its not our thing, Martin, Alex, Max, Conor, Dave, Luke, Alen, Jesse, Wayne, Emad, Dan and a few others are very impressive, but whats more impressive is they would outlift 99% of gym goers in commercial gyms.

I should also add, that the "novice tag" was not started by me, but it was something I was subjected to before most of you were born. In 1979, I read that youre a novice until 300/200/400 lbs, I simplified it, 3 plates, 2 plates, 4 plates

Do you do anything particular for recovering guys? Just light weights or do you have them focus on isolation exercises to build up supporting strength etc?

How is Emad recovering, what's the plan there?

Bozo, no matter what program you do, the aim is to ALWAYS add weight,

Each rehab is individual, guys with crook backs or knees bench, guys with crook shoulders/elbows squat and pull. No one trains light, ever. If you cant train go home and rest

Emad doesnt have the go ahead to lift yet

One of the things I loved about Findlays, was the calibre of people going there and leading by example. And there were a lot of them. You couldn't just blame someone's physique or strength on genetics and steroids. As a weak and skinny, you were the exception; the odd one out. Man I felt so tiny going there. I'm certain this is one of the bigger issues in commercial gyms - the goal achievers, the people everyone wants to be like, are few and far between.

I said before that humans are emulators. When your expectations are set by the average commercial gym goer, that's gonna leave you with mediocre goals, advice and examples to go off.

I remember my dad pointing out a Mr Australia (?) competitor at Findlays once. All I ever saw him do at that gym was eat buckets of chicken in the office. I never saw him lift a single weight anytime I was there. You don't see things like this in most gyms - probably why the importance of food in training goes unaccounted for by most.

All I usually see in my gym are curlbros, footballers and hungry skeleton types, with the odd competitive bodybuilder / obvious juicer who smashes out on the machines and only does light compounds (they also may be training multiple times a day, I don't know). Haven't seen many other fatties doing anything other than sitting around on the pec dec machine though.

I look up to one of my training partners for an example, sub 12% bodyfat, big muscles, and very strong (at least compared to everyone else at the gym). He also has a good knowledge of proper form and mobility movements like stretching, so has been a HUGE help to me.

Markos, yeah I was trying to get an idea of whether I should be trying to add every session - I was reading through your thread on AusBB and got the answer I was after (yes until it slows down, then every week).

Very few injuries, oddly enough most done outside the gym, like slicing through a calf tendon, knee playing football

Lifting related, lower back muscle pulls, sore elbows, thats the main ones.

Had a new guy join last night, wants to compete in powerlifting, did a bodybuilding show a few years ago, but lately been concentrating on powerlifting only

He weighs 82kg, squats 160kg, benches 122.5kg and deadlifts 175kg. Decided to bite the bullet and join us. He saw the numbers my guys put up at Nats, swallowed his pride and joined up.

He will do our October Novice Comp, will be interesting to see what we can do in a short time frame

These testing companies are a pain in the ass to get a response or even a call back from. Will give it another week of hassling, if I don't see success I'll just refund people's research donations.

I think the absolute biggest issue is people have forgotten what gyms are intended for, or that "weight training" is actually called progressive resistance training.

Most gym users are what we call mouth breathers. We feel most waste their time in the gym. The only difference with us is we follow progressive resistance training and we teach proper technique. Not what PT's call proper technique, but proper lifting technique.

So some of our clients want to compete in powerlifting, the most accessible strength sport. Whether your in the PL section or not, progressive resistance is the aim.

Injury. I've had many come for injury rehab, namely backs. Wayne has fallen off ladders and broken his back twice. He was a mess, at 40 years old he couldnt pick anything up. His wife was training at PTC and she suggested he try it and see if I could help him. That was late 2010. At 43yo Wayne now deadlifts 240kg, squats 200kg and benches 135kg. Back is good.

Ryan had been seeing a chiro/physio twice a week for years. He is a builder, in his early 30's. His whole family trains at PTC, sister, brother, brother in law, sister in law etc. They talked him into coming in. He deadlifts 250kg now.

Obviously over the past 5 1/2 years there are many more, but you get the idea.

I can see why most think its a PL gym, I dont talk about the regular gym clients as I dont find what they do exciting, not exciting enough to talk about on a forum. By years end I'll have 3 clients deadlift 300kg, I have 2 so far. Thats exciting.

As far as physiques go, even though its not our thing, Martin, Alex, Max, Conor, Dave, Luke, Alen, Jesse, Wayne, Emad, Dan and a few others are very impressive, but whats more impressive is they would outlift 99% of gym goers in commercial gyms.

I should also add, that the "novice tag" was not started by me, but it was something I was subjected to before most of you were born. In 1979, I read that youre a novice until 300/200/400 lbs, I simplified it, 3 plates, 2 plates, 4 plates

just a couple of days ago, a guy i know going to gym frequently, i told him to increase his weights as often as he could.....was stoked with the 'burn' after applying a basic progressive method.. Apparently it's not common knowledge :/

These testing companies are a pain in the ass to get a response or even a call back from. Will give it another week of hassling, if I don't see success I'll just refund people's research donations.

You better not leave with our money!

Alex Deken started with us 9 weeks ago, his PB's were 180kg squat, 140kg bench and a 200kg deadlift, pretty good numbers. He was the strongest guy at his gym but he wanted to get stronger.

He did a Novice comp in July where he went 210/160/230

Tonight he squatted 190kg x 10. That is outstanding progress for a guy who was already strong

By Nats next year he will be very competitive in the 90kg class. He was 82kg when he started, those days are gone. It may even be a struggle keeping him under 90kg. He is very lean with a very impressive physique.

His next comp is the Melbourne Cup - Sunday the 8th of September at PTC

He was 82kg when he walked in, 89kg now

ALL our powerlifters do PTC Method, a program written by Max

Our powerlifters are on a different membership, they get individual programs, coaching, nutrition advice.

Some join the other section first then migrate over when they see what our guys do. Alex knew all about Max and Martin, the 2 in the same weight class as him, so he joined the PL team straight off.

With the weight thing

Since Nats in mid June

Alex 82kg - 89kg

Martin 82kg - 93kg

Stelian 89kg - 103kg

Daniel 120kg-126kg

Lots of our lifters are moving up a weight class (or 2) for 2014

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • 2001 BE5D Subaru Legacy B4 RSK (3rd gen) EJ208 (pink injector) Twin Turbo 280PS 5-speed manual Full time 4WD "RSK" grade which means all of the above LQC option which means stock rear spoiler  I got it primarily to export to someone outside Japan who was interested. These BE5 Legacy B4 RSKs are going through a bit of a resurgence right know in Japan as they are one of the few cars from the "turbo, manual, RWD/4WD, 280hp gentleman's agreement era" cars that don't require stupid money to purchase. Which for some people might be a good opportunity to get as a base for restoration. If I can't find anyone to purchase it I will certainly be doing that myself over the long term. Why? Because it's properly fast in stock form, handles well enough for a GT sedan, there's still enough aftermarket and (if you can wait a while) genuine part support to make it a restoration candidate (<-- that will only get worse over time so it's a case of do it now or choose get a BL5 4th Gen). Mechanically it's fine, has only 89,200kms on the odometer. The problem with this car is that the body and exterior trims are weathered from at least the last 10 years being parked outdoors. I'm the 3rd owner, the first owner was the one that had it for 14 years and barely drove it, had a low-speed front impact (which didn't damage anything behind the radiator support) and got it fixed and sold it. The 2nd owner put most of the kms on it and parked it outside for the last 10 years, hence the door rubbers have seen better days but if you overlook those cosmetic details, it presents pretty nicely. There is some minor rust on the LH rear wheel arch which I'll have looked at too at some stage.  Also as you'd expect from a car this age, the clear top coat is gone, leaving a satin finish on the roof.  Mechanically it's fine (as you would expect from a car with less than 100K kms) but the steering does feel slightly vague around the centre position at higher speeds. So first on the list is to get the steering rack bushes looked at. There's also the Lock button on the remote which doesn't work, but the Open button does.... it means that the anti-theft system thinks it's always open? It seems like if you open the car and don't start the engine within 3 mins or so the anti-theft kicks in again without any beeps or signals. So if you got to start it after that, it won't. You have to push the open button again. That's how I understand it anyway. Just a small irritation but not a big problem to sort out. There's only one mod, the Wangan SPL muffler. Just a tad louder than stock. It's a really good mod for those who don't want to wake the neighbours but still want to hear a more prominent unequal length header EJ20 sound. Anyway I hope to get all those things done eventually, that is unless someone wanted to import it to their country from Japan (where I live). I'm open for negotiations as I really would like a Skyline... but this will definitely suffice in the meantime 🙂 *Disclaimer: This is how I picked it up from the dealer, minus the stuff on the back seat. I haven't cleaned the engine bay or done a thorough exterior clean, aside from spray painting the wipers. 
    • Wow, even with the Audi logo centre caps. I love OEM wheel mismatches. 
    • Welcome!  Can't go wrong with a Stag.
    • Looks good. Nice height.
    • Hey all, a little help from the Stagea hive mind plz.. I'm days away from buying either a 2002 Stagea 250tRS AR-X Four, premium leather, power seats and all the old switches etc that go with it, or a 2002 Stagea 250tRS VR-X Four AERO, pov pack, cloth seats etc, with coil overs, sports zorst, comes with original zorst and suspension and parts. (I think I've got the models right?) Both are VQ25DET, have 160000kms, both straight no rust both with $2000+ in recent servicing receipts, both ride on aftermarket 18" rims. The Aero has a replaced turbo as well. I like the cool factor of the Aero car but the AR-X has never been modified. Neither have been driven hardly at all in the last 5 years. Any thoughts on which one or does it come down to personal preference? davemoto 
×
×
  • Create New...