Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

rev I think a lot of regular people are starting to realise that growth doesn't happen in the gym these days,

Don't agree with you, I see no evidence of it with regular people.

but I personally find it hard to not be doing something for my 5 days of the week.

No one says you have to do 5 days, it could be 2 or it could be 2 weeks,who knows it's muscle specific too. You do what is necessary. In all cases the best results will always be delivered throughy 'hard' choices and hard work.

Rest challenges can be the same old things like ego , worry and doubt. You think you are faster to recover than you what you measure. You are worried you will get weaker if you wait another day. You doubt that longer rest will deliver.

maybe it's just the people I associate with, though that said, I literally do not know anyone else who does compound workouts over a 3/4 day bodypart split either!

I guess the thing is here rev, that since I'm currently aiming for weight loss, that it feels 'lazy' to not be doing something in the gym in between the 3 days a week that I do my routine.

I've said this before - whether 3 days is optimal or 5 days; if you're overall happier going in and busting it out 5 days a week instead of 3, why the f**k wouldn't you? Personally I'd rather "waste my time" doing extra workouts instead of whatever the alternative, wishing I was doing something.

But that's just me, I f**king HATE being sedentary with a passion.

  • Like 1

Everyone here harasses Markos for his opinion day in day out, yet they completely ignore what he has to say on anything they don't want to hear. Typical f**king internet huh.

Markos - care to ditch a single sentence post in here regarding your thoughts on "over training"? People seem to have ignored forgotten what you said on it last time.

I dont harass him - I just find some of his responses hard to decipher, or just frustrating (but I think some of that is his very dry sense of humour).

I've been trying to follow his methodology, but apparently the stuff out of his newsletters is not all still current (I read from 1 to 100).

Edited by bozodos

The only sticking point for me is what assistance things to do to help with conditioning on the days I'm not doing my lifts, or if I should just be resting since this routine is quite hard.

Markos did write about majoring in the minor shit, and I can see what means, I'm not always asking questions in relation to myself, sometimes it's just out of curiosity!

Overtraining...............sigh

Now on a serious note, my lifters want to know all about these low reps and long breaks theyre meant to be doing lol

On a 12 week program, we start with 12's for 2 weeks, then 10's for 2 weeks, then 8's for 2 weeks, you get the point, they only hit singles once in a 3 month program

Because you guys see the RESULTS of their training, being a 1RM, you assume that all they do. Max, Martin and Jack have just started their prep for ProRawFive, not fun doing such high reps. Dan America is competing next weekend with Zoran, Alex, Jason etc, they are all doing PB's this week.

We have lifters in different stages of comp prep, all doing different things. Today Dan walked in, warmed up, benched 180kg and went home. Max is in Week 1, he has been training for over 2 hours, both were benching today.

In a 12 week prep I guarantee we do more reps than 99% of regular lifters AND use more weight than 99% of regular lifters, all within the program, the guys do 40 rep sets early on. Zoran deadlifted 305kg@110kg last night.

Our program is very developed, its not 5 x 5 or 3 x 8, every exercise is hand picked, as are the reps, depending on the stage.

Comments like our boys do singles with 20 minute rest are erroneous.

We have 2 price structures in the gym.

1. You pay $20pw, use the gym for 7 days, powerlifting area is off limits

2. You pay $40, you get programming, coaching and nutrition advice, use of the whole gym

So Max has every competing lifters program in his iPad, the entire program, so when they come in they either ask Max or look it up on his iPad.

Max writes all these programs for the lifters in his spare time. They are based off last comp lifts or tested PB's if the client hasnt competed before.

He selects the lifters next meet, then works backwards from that date. Lewis is a Sudanese boy that just started with us, very skinny, he is doing 5 x 5 until his first comp is 12 weeks away, then he begins his comp prep. While he's doing 5 x 5, Max has picked assistance exercises to help with his weaknesses.

Dan America totalled 700kg on June 15 at Nats, weighing 125kg. He is still 125kg, has not missed a single rep this prep, not one, has a 280kg squat to get tomorrow and he is at 100%.

The ability to write a 12 week program for a lifter who is very advanced, have him make EVERY rep, yet still end up with new PB's totalling 745kg is nothing short of incredible. At Nats Dan squatted 265kg, benched 160kg and deadlifted 275kg. This week, after his 280kg squat in the morning, he has benched 180kg and deadlifted 285kg.

I'd post up the 180kg bench and 285kg squat but bozo dont play that.

Programming, coaching and support in a team is why our guys improve so much.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • My first car was a HG. I'm very familiar with them. A mild cam upgrade is a good idea. The 186 is a very flexible engine - meaning it has good torque from down low. You can give up a little torque down low for quite a lot more excitement in the mid range, and a bit more up top - but they are not exactly a rev monster. You need to upgrade valve springs at the minimum. For a bigger cam, you'd want to make sure it wasn't still running the original fibre cam gear. That would be unlikely, given that most of them shat themselves in the 70s and 80s, but still within the realms of possibility. Metal cam gear required. Carbies are a huge issue. The classic upgrade was always a Holley 350, which works, but is usually pretty bad for fuel consumption. The 186S had a 2 barrel Stromberg on it that was very similar to the one on the 253, and is a reasonable thing if you can find one, and find someone to help you get it set up (which is the same issue with setting up a 350 to work nice). The more classic upgrade was twin sidedraught CD type carbs, or triples of same, or triple Webers. The XU-1 triple Webers being the best example. You can still buy all this stuff new, I think, but it's a lot of coin to drop. And then the people able to set them up are getting fewer and further in between. There's still some, but it used to be everyone's** dad and uncle could do it. **Not everyone's! But a lot. All in all, I wouldn't get too carried away with the engine. Anything you do to it without a full rebuild for power and revs will only make it slightly faster. I am all in favour of a complete teardown rebuild, with nice rods and pistons, 10 or 1.5:1 compression, and a clean port job with at least a big enough cam to run 98 with that compression, if not bigger. And if I did that to a dirty old red motor, I'd want to inject it too, which I'd struggle to fight against the devil on my shoulder that would argue for ITBs and trumpets. But the bills would start to mount up, and it will still never make stupid power. OK, a few people still know how to build absolutely mental red motors, courtesy of the work that went into HQ racing and modern knowledge being applied. But even a 300HP red motor is no match for an RB20 with a TD06. So you have to decide what it's worth to you. I'd just put a set of 6>2>1 extractors, a 2.5" exhaust and an electronic ignition conversion/dizzy on it and just run the old girl like the fairly slow old girl that she really is.
    • Thank you so much for the comments.  This is very interesting and gives me some great ideas to think about. Keen to keep it simple and relatively classic looking. That said, i am not too worried about staying 100% period correct.  A little extra performance and relatively good (or improved) economy is just what i am looking for. Ill be keeping any parts i swap out so if i get nostalgic i can always swap it all back in.  Right now just trying to get some good ideas from people in the know (I still have a lot to learn in this space). Thank you again!  
    • Wrt the engine, you're very much limited by 'production quality' as to how much extra power you can extract from them (I'm talking i6 red-motor) -- a lot here depends on how 'authentic' or 'period correct' you want the modifications to be... ...I'm too old... <grin>...the first true performance engine Holden made, was in the HD/HR models ~ this was the 'X2' performance pack...it came with twin downdraft strombergs on an otherwise unimproved intake manifold, with a two piece exhaust manifold (reckoned to be as good as extractors)... ....these engines were built upon the '179HP' cylinder block, which included extra webbing in the casting to make it stronger and less susceptible to block distortion... The next performance i6 came out with the HK Monaro (also found it's way into the LJ GTR Torana ... the car I wish I hadn't sold)...it had pretty much the same manifold setup, but was built against the '186S' block...this block retained all the extra webbing of the 179HP block, but added a forged steel crankshaft (instead of the stock cast crankshaft), because it was possible to snap the crank... ...apart from the inherent weaknesses in the stock (cast crank) blocks, the next limiting factor is the cylinder head porting & combustion chamber design, and the actual valve sizes. Back in the day, you could buy a 'yella terra' cylinder head (from stage 1 to stage 5 gradients), and this was the way to get serious power out of them -- with the extra breathing of these heads, you could fit a triple SU or DCOE Weber setup... ...obviously, these mods were a waste of time on a stock cylinder head/camshaft grind. My housemate rebuilt the i6 in his VH dunnydore about 6 months back -- this is a 186S block with the 12port 2850 blue motor head and intake/exhaust manifolds, with a dual throat Weber off an XF Falcon mounted on an adapter plate ; it's not a bad makeup...got more torque & fuel economy just light-footing it about on the first throat, but stand on it and it makes more giddy-up than the standard 2850 blue motor that it replaced. Personal note: I'd just fit an RB30 and be done it it 😃  
    • Thanks for sharing. That's a great video! My buddy is doing the same thing on his build (S chassis struts and towers). He's building an S14 with billet RB30 shooting for 2000whp... a race car with a TH400 just like this video. For a road car I just couldn't go this route as the strut has to be almost vertical and the caster is not going to pivot correctly (let alone camber gain). You think the R32 frontend is bad, wait till you put a MacPherson strut on without modeling it all in Solidworks to check geometry. I'm not saying it's a bad way to do it but I'd be really curious to see how it affects the geometry.
    • Hey Christof and welcome!  Sounds like an awesome project! I'm not sure many of the regular users on here would know much about the HK but I could be wrong.  Looking forward to updates.
×
×
  • Create New...