Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Thanks Joey,

re cardio I cannot run yet I am upto 4.3 kph, i have had a good surgeon and have ongoing physio every week. I'm slowly improving my diet which isn't perfect so I'm looking for some sort of protien shake to maximise my recovery from exercise and fill holes in my diet.

Ahh I'm assuming your back is really not in a good shape if your maximum walking speed is 4.3kph. Hopefully soon enough you can get it up to around the 7kmh. When I did my cutting last year I was doing 35-40min of walking at around 7kmh with an incline of a crew degrees.. I'm no expert but I think that would be a good goal.

Like you said if you clean your diet up you will see the results come alot faster. 4kg in 2 months is still a respectable effort for someone in your situation.

I reckon if your diet is decent you won't need the protein powder. But if you really want to take it obviously dont get anything with bulk calories.

  • Like 1

I'm not looking to start a debate on whether you can really train upper and lower chest, but what I can say is that I've recently noticed my lower chest is getting a bit big and round for my liking. This is despite having lost a bit of weight recently.

Time to incline the bench a bit or just lower weight and do more volume?

Edited by ActionDan

I'm not looking to start a debate on whether you can really train upper and lower chest, but what I can say is that I've recently noticed my lower chest is getting a bit big and round for my liking. This is despite having lost a bit of weight recently.

Time to incline the bench a bit or just lower weight and do more volume?

more volume is going to encourage muscle growth, i.e. size.

On a different note did anyone see that supps r us for burnt down? I saw it on the news the other day. Bloody shame ( I had just placed an order ) it was strange the owner made reference to the other supp stores suggesting they may of had some something to do with it.

Maybe that's why they've grown, as I switched back to sets of 8, but lighter.

I just thought maybe lighter again but more reps might tighten everything up.

I note that when tensed, my lower pec is very firm but my upper is quite soft by comparison.

Maybe that's why they've grown, as I switched back to sets of 8, but lighter.

I just thought maybe lighter again but more reps might tighten everything up.

I note that when tensed, my lower pec is very firm but my upper is quite soft by comparison.

Every time after I get a massage, my chest is always flatter/smaller in appearance because muscles are released. Maybe you can ball/roll them out a bit to get desired result?

Got an issue with my shoulder at the moment. Haven't lifted anything for a few weeks die to it. Hurts to lays on it and cant throw a tennis ball without mass pain. Not sure if I should see a physio about it

Dunno if ball rolling is the answer for me.

Ideally I just need the lower part of my pec to not be so full, could be fat too I guess?

And the upper to be a bit firmer.

For anyone doing incline, where are you feeling the burn?

I'd almost say I feel my flat bench more in the tri's than chest specifically. Though I've always got a pump in the tits afterwards. So was thinking incline to even it out if that actually works.

Should probably see a physio if its been a couple weeks haha where abouts is the pain?

<br /><br />Practically the entire shoulder.... When I throw a ball its like my entire shoulder is clicking through the action and then sharp pain.

Dunno if ball rolling is the answer for me.

Ideally I just need the lower part of my pec to not be so full, could be fat too I guess?

And the upper to be a bit firmer.

For anyone doing incline, where are you feeling the burn?

I'd almost say I feel my flat bench more in the tri's than chest specifically. Though I've always got a pump in the tits afterwards. So was thinking incline to even it out if that actually works.

Watch the first video I posted a page back, Dan. Bench is more tris and shoulders than chest. It will work the chest, obviously, and the different positions will activate the chest more or less...but if you want to target it in a more involved way, get onto an isolation movement like flies.

That being said, most of the chest muscle naturally sits where you refer to as the "lower part", so a lot of people have this issue at some stage and, it's only really an issue because we feel like we are developing "boobs" instead of muscle. It is less obvious on those who have lower body fat %, because, not only does the upper part of the pec insertion have more definition, but the abdomen is slightly sunken (as opposed to flat or a gut), helping the so called "upper chest" to stand out a bit more (more forward of the body) and the "lower chest" to recess a bit (instead of sitting on top of fat). That's my opinion, anyway.

It is also less obvious on heavily built chests, because the muscle is then big enough that you start to see the "upper part" as more developed, when really it's just that the whole pec insertion is bigger. But alas, I am one of those who subscribe to the theory that you can't change the shape of the pecs per say, only build it bigger to give the illusion of having done that.

There are all kinds of muscles in the upper body that can mess with the appearance of the pecs just by contrast, too: traps, lats, biceps, delts. Even your posture plays a huge part; try standing in front of a mirror, side on, moving your delts back and forth to see how they stretch the muscle in a static state.

I was just reading this: http://www.aworkoutroutine.com/how-to-build-a-big-upper-and-lower-chest/

And I'm inclined to think it's likely just excess fat in my case.

I don't want my chest to be any bigger at all so I wont be doing flies (can't at home anyway).

What I need is to get some cardio back in my routine. Especially as I get older I want to tone and tighten more.

Or Euro training...

Dips might be contributing as well.

Edited by ActionDan

Practically the entire shoulder.... When I throw a ball its like my entire shoulder is clicking through the action and then sharp pain.

I'm not an expert, but it sounds like an impingement of some sort, would definitely see a physio if it's been a few weeks of pain already.

Maybe someone (like rev) with more experience will chime in.

Ahh I'm assuming your back is really not in a good shape if your maximum walking speed is 4.3kph. Hopefully soon enough you can get it up to around the 7kmh. When I did my cutting last year I was doing 35-40min of walking at around 7kmh with an incline of a crew degrees.. I'm no expert but I think that would be a good goal.

Like you said if you clean your diet up you will see the results come alot faster. 4kg in 2 months is still a respectable effort for someone in your situation.

I reckon if your diet is decent you won't need the protein powder. But if you really want to take it obviously dont get anything with bulk calories.

Thanks for the help Joey, hopefully I can fit in my bride seat again and get the old dunga out to a track day this year when the back get up to it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...