Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Purchased the WALKMAN W273S head set to belt out aggressive tunes to myself whilst training and swimming.

Excellent for only $70, really light and secure even doing wild out of control last sets of sleds.

Haven't swam in them yet but I did shower in them which was interesting.

  • Like 1

New squat PB of 80kg x 20 reps, all ass to ground and high bar. Up 5 reps from 15 last session.

WOW, simply one of the most intense pieces of exercise I have ever done. It is 99% a mental battle, standing there with the bar across your traps, the weight feeling heavier and heavier as time goes by, struggling to catch your breath and wanting to throw in the towel after every rep - I wanted to stop at 10 but had this insane drive to keep going and going. Racking it after 20 I promptly collapsed to the ground because my legs couldn't hold me up anymore lol. Took longer to catch my breath after that than my old 3km HIIT sprints used to.

So yes, painful and energy sapping as all hell, but so damn rewarding. Not looking forward to stairs and toilet seats tomorrow.

  • Like 2

I'm a bit sleight at the moment, weighing in at 81.5kg lastnight, so they were 98% bodyweight :)

Surprisingly my 1RM isn't going up, despite consistently adding a rep or two to the 80kg volume each session. Usually I can bounce one off the other (1RM vs volume) and vice versa.

With certainty in bench, I know that if I can get out 7-8 reps of 100 then I can do a single of 120 etc. Squats seems to be a different ball game!

A bit of empirical theory; I suspect that in the high volume squats I have more time during the set to gradually recruit each muscle in the chain, which could explain my second wind after 10 reps. Comparatively, a 1RM being a single rep, if you don't have everything doing it's part straight up, you won't be lifting to your potential. That and the lower weight squats are probably more controlled? Combination of lots of factors probably.

I'm a bit sleight at the moment, weighing in at 81.5kg lastnight, so they were 98% bodyweight :)

Surprisingly my 1RM isn't going up, despite consistently adding a rep or two to the 80kg volume each session. Usually I can bounce one off the other (1RM vs volume) and vice versa.

With certainty in bench, I know that if I can get out 7-8 reps of 100 then I can do a single of 120 etc. Squats seems to be a different ball game!

A bit of empirical theory; I suspect that in the high volume squats I have more time during the set to gradually recruit each muscle in the chain, which could explain my second wind after 10 reps. Comparatively, a 1RM being a single rep, if you don't have everything doing it's part straight up, you won't be lifting to your potential. That and the lower weight squats are probably more controlled? Combination of lots of factors probably.

I was under the impression that anything around 8rm+ doesn't have the carry over to 1rm.

That could certainly explain my observations, and also why 1RM calculators are limited to a 10 rep input...though I always thought that was because the algebraic equations would blow out reliability with any number higher than 10.

Probably also explains why my <10 rep sets are affected by my intensity during a prior 1RM, yet I always have room in the tank for the high volume weights.

Would like to know the physiology behind it. Slow vs fast twitch fibers being used for one and not the other?

Can we therefore assume that if these different "strengths" operate independantly of one another, I could train both rep ranges in the one session (as I'm doing now) without them negatively impacting each other? Creating a rounded combination of strength and endurance?

As an aside to this, when I was training low weight bench for a couple weeks I got my 60kg reps up to about 27-28 and my 1RM was probably around 115, however during my strongest 1RM period (122.5kg), when I had mostly been focusing on low rep sets, I gave the 60kg challenge a shot and only completed around 23 reps.

That could certainly explain my observations, and also why 1RM calculators are limited to a 10 rep input...though I always thought that was because the algebraic equations would blow out reliability with any number higher than 10.

Probably also explains why my <10 rep sets are affected by my intensity during a prior 1RM, yet I always have room in the tank for the high volume weights.

Would like to know the physiology behind it. Slow vs fast twitch fibers being used for one and not the other?

Can we therefore assume that if these different "strengths" operate independantly of one another, I could train both rep ranges in the one session (as I'm doing now) without them negatively impacting each other? Creating a rounded combination of strength and endurance?

Depends I guess, your training methods have proved to be slow progressing in the max/1rm scale (not starting an argument).. So they must affect each other.

If you focused on one or the other in cycles I'd assume you'd have greater (quicker) results in both areas.

Most training cycles start with higher volume/intensity in the earlier weeks and taper down to peaking. But, they are generally always reps for more weight, not weight for more reps.

  • 2 weeks later...

Morning all.

I'm still here, doing little more than maintenance these days due to work, not great sleep, long winter season of illness etc. Lost 5-6kgs (not intentionally and it sucks, but hey, more abs) and am only getting 3x 30-40min sessions a week these days so unsurprisingly my strength/size has/is also going backwards.

Because I cannot easily control the factors affecting it, what's the best approach to try and minimise the losses? Drop the weight so I can get out the full rep/set scheme (3x8 in most cases, 2x15 on squats bu they are only light and are a special case due to my back) or continue doing what I've been doing which is struggle but keep adding sets to get the full volume out. as in 8, 8, 5, 3 or 8, 7, 6, 3 etc.

Good to see you guys (and Leesh) still cranking out your sessions :D

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Absolutely could be. I collected data logs from when the O2 sensor was still out and also after I had replaced it so will try to compare them. Pretty confident that the affect is lowered with the new sensor, will check logs at the same RPMs/conditions. 
    • Hey guys Long time lurker, I daily a nm35 stagea 250t rs four and I've had it for almost 2 years (very reliable 👌). Issues or just looking for information ill always find myself here having a read, so thought id join.  3inch stainless intake, pod filter, AM performance turbo dump pipe, 3inch hotdog, 3 and half inch stainless to 3 and half inch AM performance blast pipes. Bc racing coilovers. 18inch rims Hdi intercooler and trans cooler soon.  Here's my car
    • thanks for the advice on the box... i was thinking the 6 speed was better for cruising on the highway but on closer inspection and comparison the Rb 5 speed box was not too different...  So the choice is going to be the RB25 box... if I can save up and find one at the right price  
    • Thanks Matt, yes that's what i am aiming for. Just going to apply the right voltage and grounds to the dash connector. Hence my search for these pins... any chance you know if these pins are in the same spot as the ones on the S15 Dash connector? as mentioned above on page 8?
    • Yes, unfortunately that's the one. Signal was noisy to begin with; after driving once and looking back at the logs I saw pressure constantly swinging between 0-200psi, or staying at 0 randomly for a few seconds. There's a lot of good sensors that share the same look and feel, so don't presume they're all bad. I bought mine for 20$ off Amazon and I should have read the reviews prior, as it's clear they're junk.  I purchased a lowdollerr motorsports sensor. 
×
×
  • Create New...