Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Depends on your goals. I know I deliberated for quite some time with what I wanted, didn't stick to a proper diet or anything...so I can't give more precise advice. I can assure that simply increasing intake of good shit will give results, but it might be a little slow for your liking or you might find you aren't 'feeling it' so to speak.

If you decide that you want to smash it out a bit faster or want an easier way to increase calories again without having to cook so much, you might be interested in looking at a good* mass gainer. It will provide the extra fuel you'll need for sure. Otherwise definitely just stick with the BN and push hard. This is where you want to get into the big lifts like deadlifts and squats.

It's right in the lumbar erectors muscle bellies on each side and the tops of my gluts.

Tis' a good feeling!

If you're feeling it too much in your lumber you're probably not doing it right.

Make sure the back is locked so tight it isn't flexing.

As TTT posted, Mark Ripptoe - starting strength.

Trying to decide if I should be getting something now to bulk up a little or just stick with it and increase my eating.

I have lost a total of 8kg over the past few months now since starting.

Currently sitting at 69kg 170cm

Are your strength gains increasing? I wouldn't worry if they are.

It's amazing how much body fat you actually have. unless your aim is to 'look' big dont put on false size.

I rate power to weight ratios. Again, it's whatever goal you're after, look good in a shirt, or look good naked.

Did flat bench DB press with 50s tonight for reps, gym finally got DBs bigger than 42s! Geez!

What's the go with gyms only going upto 40kg odd in dumbells?

Seems like its a rare thing to find a gym that has heavier dumbells.

Anyway, props on getting the 50's done!

Kasko, if u are ordering from BN, let me know so I can get in on it!

Edited by Mitcho_7

How many reps? How do you get those suckers up into starting position?

What's the go with gyms only going upto 40kg odd in dumbells?

Seems like its a rare thing to find a gym that has heavier dumbells.

Anyway, props on getting the 50's done!

Kasko, if u are ordering from BN, let me know so I can get in on it!

Thanks fellas :)

My little book says I only got four out. Got em up myself but used a mate to guide the weight (to make sure the DBs didn't swing one way or the other). Will shoot for more next time!

The sets went like: 30-8 / 36-8 / 42-8 / 50-4. Felt like I had a bit more but the form was going, so not to be. I know I need to strengthen my shoulders and core to improve my stability. My shoulder presses are pathetic.

Yeah I find it surprising how few gyms seem to have the larger DBs. Would appear to be a staple to me.

I also seem to be the only one at my gym who carries a notebook around and writes everything down. Do any of you guys write down your iron for the day/night? Maybe it's just my OCD!

Edited by God_speed

Are your strength gains increasing? I wouldn't worry if they are.

It's amazing how much body fat you actually have. unless your aim is to 'look' big dont put on false size.

I rate power to weight ratios. Again, it's whatever goal you're after, look good in a shirt, or look good naked.

This. Let the strength gains put on the kg. People get too caught up in weight figures when trying to get big, which are meaningless without BF% to back them up. It kind of mystifies me when someone says they would like to weigh xxxkg or set weight goals without knowing what they'll look like at that weight.

Also big on power to weight ratios. Putting on fat is only going to reduce this! I love being light at 79kg and benching the same (and sometimes more) than my 100kg friends.

Thanks fellas :)

My little book says I only got four out. Got em up myself but used a mate to guide the weight (to make sure the DBs didn't swing one way or the other). Will shoot for more next time!

The sets went like: 30-8 / 36-8 / 42-8 / 50-4. Felt like I had a bit more but the form was going, so not to be. I know I need to strengthen my shoulders and core to improve my stability. My shoulder presses are pathetic.

Yeah I find it surprising how few gyms seem to have the larger DBs. Would appear to be a staple to me.

I also seem to be the only one at my gym who carries a notebook around and writes everything down. Do any of you guys write down your iron for the day/night? Maybe it's just my OCD!

Interesting, my gym has 65kg dumbells. Be a long time before I can find a use for them, besides side raising them off the rack to see if I could lift one with one hand lol.

I don't write down my stuff, I'm that OCD that I can remember exactly what I did last session. Not a bad idea though, if you want to track long term progress. It's easy for my memory to blur things that happened last year into "a few months ago"!

I'm 6'3.

What's the go with gyms only going upto 40kg odd in dumbells?

Seems like its a rare thing to find a gym that has heavier dumbells.

Anyway, props on getting the 50's done!

I might be able to help you with this or at least provide some reasoning.

Dependant on the main target market of the gymnasium really and their budgets associated. They are not cheap and for the amount of people using them in a commercial style setting can be negligiable.

For example, expect to pay about $3 - 4 per kilo for a basic dumbell. Working with a 40kilo set (so 80 kilo at $4) is $320, then theres 42.5's then theres 45s then theres 47.5s and the 50s.

Being a large facility with a membership base over 3000 members we use what i beleive one of the best dumbells out there, the "HammerStrength" range which comes in quite a large set up to the 50 kilo mark. expensive but beautiful dumbells none the less.

The worst thing being is that if you are in a remote facility then you need to also factor in courier costs etc.

Now the other thought of a gym owner can also be the following, if i keep the dumbells maxed out at 40kilo any steroid/beefcakes who like to throw the equipment, well they can go somewhere else as I am targeting the main population, the die hards can go to a die hard gym

You see, as heavy weightlifters, you are not the majority of the population which is really what a succesful owner wants. When showing the average member around do you think the owner wants to show the "avg member" a freeweight area full of massive people yelling, grunting and groaning? no. as it can be quite overwhelming to a new average customer.

So although i beleive 40 - 50 kilo dumbells should be in gyms to assist a minority in a commercial gym, i can understand the thought process if not, unfortunately it does not boad well with weightlifters but that is pretty much it in a nutshell.

Edited by 25GTT

Just thinking though chest pressing them would show a limited range of motion as you would really only get a straight up motion because they would hit wouldn't they if you try to bring them in?

Anyone use them and if so would for, don't tell me bicep curls :)

I might be able to help you with this or at least provide some reasoning.

Dependant on the main target market of the gymnasium really and their budgets associated. They are not cheap and for the amount of people using them in a commercial style setting can be negligiable.

For example, expect to pay about $3 - 4 per kilo for a basic dumbell. Working with a 40kilo set (so 80 kilo at $4) is $320, then theres 42.5's then theres 45s then theres 47.5s and the 50s.

Being a large facility with a membership base over 3000 members we use what i beleive one of the best dumbells out there, the "HammerStrength" range which comes in quite a large set up to the 50 kilo mark. expensive but beautiful dumbells none the less.

The worst thing being is that if you are in a remote facility then you need to also factor in courier costs etc.

Now the other thought of a gym owner can also be the following, if i keep the dumbells maxed out at 40kilo any steroid/beefcakes who like to throw the equipment, well they can go somewhere else as I am targeting the main population, the die hards can go to a die hard gym

You see, as heavy weightlifters, you are not the majority of the population which is really what a succesful owner wants. When showing the average member around do you think the owner wants to show the "avg member" a freeweight area full of massive people yelling, grunting and groaning? no. as it can be quite overwhelming to a new average customer.

So although i beleive 40 - 50 kilo dumbells should be in gyms to assist a minority in a commercial gym, i can understand the thought process if not, unfortunately it does not boad well with weightlifters but that is pretty much it in a nutshell.

Loved the explanation mate, I think you nailed it. The gym I've been going to now for the past 1.5 years you would class as very commercial.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...