Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys again,

im running 11 psi boost (High) with only cat back exhaust and pod filter with NO FMIC...

Whenever i switch it to high boost (11psi) and go full throttle i can usually smell something like burning coming from under the bonnet area (can usually smell it as the window is open)...Just wondering if this means im destroying the turbo whenever i smell this or its just normal for such heat without FMIC (as i understand SMIC on GTT R34 is alright for under 200kwrw, as im running 178kwrw)...

You guys are a great help by the way, so i'd like to take your advice on this as well.

Thanks again

Does anyone else have this smell when gunning the rocket GTT R34 ? :thumbsup: with higher than stock boost?

Im not destroying the turbo am i? its just wearing like a turbo usually wears with full throttle right?

Edited by R33Turbo

i had this prob with my rb20 years ago, it was the gasket on the cam cover on the exhaust side, and on WOT applications the oil would leak past the seal and onto the hot manifold.

5 bucks for another gasket and all was good.

not saying thats what your prob is, but it could be something to look at, what kind of smell is it?

its kinda like oil heat smell yer...i was guessing it might be but it did the same on my R33 too...wats the coincidence of 2 of the cars leaking oil, but it seems to only do it on higher boost so i was thinking maybe its just the smell of the heat on higher boost?

just higher engine rpm is forcing the oil out past the cracked seals on the cam covers... quick wa yo see is if you jhave a look at the exhaust cam cover, and down the side, is it covered in crud and oil oil? if it is you've got a leak.

just higher engine rpm is forcing the oil out past the cracked seals on the cam covers... quick wa yo see is if you jhave a look at the exhaust cam cover, and down the side, is it covered in crud and oil oil? if it is you've got a leak.

Well the head gasket used to leak with oil cuz it wasn't tighten down properly but now that it has been tighten down....

Its not much of a problem is it if its leaking? i may as well live with it?

Well the head gasket used to leak with oil cuz it wasn't tighten down properly but now that it has been tighten down....

Its not much of a problem is it if its leaking? i may as well live with it?

no mate the cam cover ontop of the engine..... not the head gasket besides if u think head gasket is below the manifold so it wouldnt run onto it would it

First I would give that engine a real good degrease as you will never find oil leaks with old oil stains.But be very careful spraying water in the coilpack region and also try not to spray degreaser onto the pulleys themselves.I had one seize on me from overzealous degreasing.Once you got that motor and suspect areas spotless then you can start to study the real nature of the problem

i had this prob with my rb20 years ago, it was the gasket on the cam cover on the exhaust side, and on WOT applications the oil would leak past the seal and onto the hot manifold.

Thats got my vote aswell. I get the same thing when driving hard, and also extended drives down the motorway. changing it when i do my 100K service. Hiping thats the prob.

i've got the same smell, and i know my passenger side cam cover gasket is weaping. makes sense that it would get worse at WOT.

but i never had the smell until i did my 3 inch dump, and raised the boost to 12psi from 10psi. maybe the leak is just getting worse, or maybe the higher boost makes it leak more?

one way to find out i guess. how much are these gaskets? where's the easiest place to get one?

I have issues of blow by (MAJORLY BAD blow by) at the moment, and it causes this smell dramatically.

If it's an oil issue, track it down, fix it.

Everytime you smell it, you're burning oil from some where.

It might just be that a gasket has gone, or, with an increase in exhaust flow and higher boost, you have more blow by, and a catch can could fix it.

ive had same causes with my car but i always thought nothing much of it, and sorry to ask a newb question but where do i check? wheres the cam cover? wheres the manifold?

Lol@ 10minuteCar :P

R33Turbo - Instead of the smell being derived directly from boost, i would say its just from the increased heat when on 11psi and WOT.

As mentioned, after market systems can cause non factory heating of area's. (In your case its oil, could be plastic, rubber smell etc)

Clean it up, and look for leaks, you might need to have a think about some under bonnet heat management :(

lol

cam covers cover the cams... who woulda thought :P they are the two covers on top of the motor, the drivers side on has the oil filler hole in it, it is usually the exhaust side (passenger) that leaks onto the exhaust manifold, the exhaust manifold bolts to the head.

if you want pics, do some googling.

exhaust manifold is the passenger side where some sorta rectangular shape bolts onto something (head) right?

and are the cam covers underneath the neo cover for my r34?

  • 2 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...