Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 176
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

off topic but it was on channel 10 lol: I just saw on Channel 10 about some apprentice who got threatened in his s13 by 2 guys with machetes... the guys took the car... and set it on fire..

How screwed in the head can ppl get. :S

Edited by Magic

f*kn idiots, they cant even get the specs of a car right - how the hell do people believe all the bullshit they hear on the news when the make mistakes as basic as that...

The car does look awesome though, thanks for the upload :D

And i have never seen 12 people viewing the one post at once lol!

Yeah it was in Perth and his s13 wasn't insured either. =\

The driver was fine, they stole the car and judging on the footage they set it on fire in a vacant lot.

I mean wtf would drive someone to hijack a car... then burn it. :D

Edited by Magic

good thing is that it apparently then has been allowed to run in targa west

couple of us were discussing it at MV on the weekend - at first i think it wasnt allowed

mind you the 180km/h gps speedcut would suck ass....

So this unveiling of the gtr tonight, does anyone know its open to all? Or is it only for a select few who got to RSVP?

It's invite only, so if you didn't get an invite I wouldn't bother turning up.

I'm sure it will be on display at there showrooms soon enough for public viewing.

I heard that Nissan have refused to turn off the speedlimiter.

As it is based on GPS could be hard to bypass.

Anyone else heard this?

mines VX rom has already solve that problem :)

also rumour has it that alot of other brands have an ecu option for the r35 gtr already

Edited by [Michael]

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...