Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

the LESS money it costs to enter a car, enter as a spectator or to eat a hotdog the more people will attend

more people = greater revenue

$ greed = 0 in the end

that's my 2cents worth

Edited by Union76
  ' post= said:
Should the Competition Car community wish to return in greater numbers to Calder Park, we would be happy to accommodate them at some future time?

How about, should the organisers greed die off, we will happily reduce fees and see more competitors attend.

Stupid really.

Want too much, get nothing.

It says "Competition cars"

Not "street cars"

Competition Cars will not, until further notice, be eligible to enter into competition for the Friday night Legal Off Street Drags.

There is a different pricing structure for Comp Cars... 'Street Cars' are still going.

The Comp Cars don't get an invite any more is the point.

People getting excited over nothing :P

  R31Nismoid said:
It says "Competition cars"

Not "street cars"

Competition Cars will not, until further notice, be eligible to enter into competition for the Friday night Legal Off Street Drags.

There is a different pricing structure for Comp Cars... 'Street Cars' are still going.

The Comp Cars don't get an invite any more is the point.

People getting excited over nothing :P

i was thinking the same thing but given all the responses i thought i read wrong...

considering it was about $40 or $50 dollars(cant remember exactly) about ten years ago, and given the increase in the cost of living in ten years, $15-25 is not that much of an increase..

Im going down tonight

it is still running as stated by r31nismoid it is for comp cars only offstreet drags are still happening but as stated the number has droped off alot since the price hike friends have been going saying there is lucky to be 20cars but everyone has a sook the price is up think of it this way

$50 you got what 3 runs? no its $60 and you get 5 runs in 15min and leave due to being bored HAHA i will tell you how many cars are out tonight

  R31Nismoid said:
People getting excited over nothing ;)

I could have sworn the first time I read this thread there was a massive rant about the new Calder management being greedy f**ks by you. :)

  • 2 weeks later...

Hey guys,

Im interested in watching drifting sessions, besides calder park on wednesdays which i cant make, is there any other places that i can go 2 see drifting in vic.

another question drifting at calder park weds any good???

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...