Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

After 3 skylines I have turned to the dark side and gone for a Toyota Caldina 200+ kw turbo awd.

This is the first one in SA and the first N series in Australia.

Will be here in 2 months so say gday on the road.

Update - hmm i hear you all, here are some more pics.

It has lots of cool gear on it.

Factory recaro interior and then there is a lot of TRD gear on it.

post-3903-1200563370_thumb.jpg

post-3903-1200571209_thumb.jpg

post-3903-1200571272_thumb.jpg

Edited by cell
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/201980-my-new-rideon-its-way-from-japan/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Looks nice, any more specs?

Ryan

Here is the specs on them.

http://www.cars-directory.net/specs/toyota...na/2002_9/2028/

I was sick of paying to run a 6 cyl turbo skyline @ $1.50 a litre -plus having to worry about it being stolen.

This one is cheaper to run register and insure and still looks funky.

Edited by cell

very nice mate!

BUT .... have you looked into how stock your car is? Being the first one of the model into Aus, you may find problems with little things that weren't factory, which the SEVS workshop may not have access to evidence. Pretty much EVERY import has something on it that is a different model to evidence, and you need to change them (even if only temporarily) to a model they do have evidence on. For example my headlights were a different part number to what they had ever seen, so had to bolt in another pair for compliance. My windscreen also was an unknown part number, but luckily a Qld workshop was doing evidence on another R34 with the same part number windscreen while my car was in the SA workshop, and after a 3 week wait, the SA workshop bought the evidence off them and I didn't have to change the windscreen over. I know Skylineee is going through this atm with his R34 - and for some reason he had to have the WHOLE ENGINE changed over for compliance :)

You might want to let the workshop doing your compliance know it is a TRD version, and you might want to start sourcing some oem parts from Japan in readiness to change over the TRD parts they have no evidence on. I know the 1st guy to bring in a V35 Stagea (and it was bone stock) went through this nightmare and it took ages to comply.

very nice mate!

BUT .... have you looked into how stock your car is? Being the first one of the model into Aus, you may find problems with little things that weren't factory, which the SEVS workshop may not have access to evidence. Pretty much EVERY import has something on it that is a different model to evidence, and you need to change them (even if only temporarily) to a model they do have evidence on. For example my headlights were a different part number to what they had ever seen, so had to bolt in another pair for compliance. My windscreen also was an unknown part number, but luckily a Qld workshop was doing evidence on another R34 with the same part number windscreen while my car was in the SA workshop, and after a 3 week wait, the SA workshop bought the evidence off them and I didn't have to change the windscreen over. I know Skylineee is going through this atm with his R34 - and for some reason he had to have the WHOLE ENGINE changed over for compliance :)

You might want to let the workshop doing your compliance know it is a TRD version, and you might want to start sourcing some oem parts from Japan in readiness to change over the TRD parts they have no evidence on. I know the 1st guy to bring in a V35 Stagea (and it was bone stock) went through this nightmare and it took ages to comply.

good thing all the factory parts are in the car! the wheels are the exact measurements as factory wheels.

the Compliance shop has all the parts required allready scoped it all out, I expect issues so not worried.

Cheers anyway, by the way there are other Caldina GT Fours in oz just no N Series models.

Cheers anyway.

cool mate, I am sure it will all work out for you.

FYI it doesn't matter that the wheels are the same dimensions - they HAVE to be oem parts. No ifs ands or buts. So if the compliance workshop doesn't have evidence for the exact part numbers of every single item in your car, they will have to do the evidence themselves (= mega $$$) or hopefully they can swap them for non-N series parts.

When does she get here? I am very keen to see it in the flesh!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...