Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 172
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

evil weevil - is this the pic that you wanted?? :rolleyes:

post-26053-1201245067_thumb.jpg

the car might make 15 - 20

maybe 14....

but the top 10 no way

that car??.....top 5 for sure man......fulli hektiknez just overwhelms all other competitors.

that car??.....top 5 for sure man......fulli hektiknez just overwhelms all other competitors.

ahahah nah man, i meant the gtr......

but sure, for the hektik bros out there teh vl might even hit the top 3

Well into the top 10, being 4wd and basically purpose built it will flog em on the track....also the straight they use isn't huge so terminal speed shouldnt come into it. Its a stretch but it may well top the table... as stated purpose built 4wd it will be right at home.

lol

We'll see....... >_< at the peeps talking about "keeping it in it's usable power band" ect.. you'd think it's a big single turbo r32 we were discussing.. Intead of a 3.8 v6 twin tubo with an almost linear power delivery, the cars not a pig on the track regardless of track size as it's testing has already shown. Could be something to do with the design brief to build a car with "supercar stats" instead of a GT production racer. The r35 is a few generations more advanced than all previous gtr's and is also in a different class.

Lol you must old calling me son...Lad >_<

Nah I doubt it... it was a throw line away as if to say I wouldn't be suprised where it came.

The a10 does have it on power to weight and although it's distibution of weight is near perfect....but it's still a 460kw RWD which makes it a bit of a handful on tightish tracks without a huge straight. The stig will be able to wring the life out of the GTR without much care, the car won't dissappear in a cloud of smoke. It'll be interesting to see.

Edited by madbung

The response of the new R35 GTR on a very tight 'driver training' track was insane, looked absolutely balanced. I think you can forget it's going to have any problems.I talked to the guy pedaling it and he said it felt incredible and had balance unlike any car he had ever driven, including much smaller worked over evo's, the car is just planted to the road.

I'm thinking between the Z06 and the Ascari.

If anything, the GTR MAY come close to matching the time of the LP640; but i still find it difficult to see how it will beat the time of anything faster than that. Those cars might be RWD, but they weren't exactly struggling for traction when driven by the Stig (if i remember correctly).

being such a small track i dont think that outright power and top speed r going to come into it, i dont think it will make the top 10 maybe top 15 but there are some awesome cars on that list like ther koeniggseg (or whatever) which r tiny and seriously fly.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I would just put EBC back on the "I would not use their stuff" pile and move on.
    • Can I suggest you try EBC directly again and link them to as many competitor catalogues as you can to show their listing is incorrect, eg https://dba.com.au/product/front-4000-series-hd-brake-rotor-dba42304/ If you have access to an R33 GTST VIN and your VIN, you could also use a Nissan Parts lookup like Amayama to show them the part number is different between 33 GTST and 34 GTT which may get their attention
    • So i got reply from EBC and they just this site where you can clearly see those 296mm fronts on R34 GTT. I send them photos and "quotes" that 296mm are not for 34 GTT and they are too small. But it will be very hard to return them cuz nobody here knows 100% and they just copy those EBC catalogue :-D https://ebcbrakesdirect.com/automotive/nissan/skyline-r34
    • Hi, is the HKS  Tower Bar still available ? negotiable ? 🤔
    • From there, it is really just test and assemble. Plug the adapter cables from the unit into the back of the screen, then the other side to the car harness. Don't forget all the other plugs too! Run the cables behind the unit and screw it back into place (4 screws) and you should now have 3 cables to run from the top screen to the android unit. I ran them along the DS of the other AV units in the gap between their backets and the console, and used some corrugated tubing on the sharp edges of the bracket so the wires were safe. Plug the centre console and lower screen in temporarily and turn the car to ACC, the AV should fire up as normal. Hold the back button for 3 sec and Android should appear on the top screen. You need to set the input to Aux for audio (more on that later). I put the unit under the AC duct in the centre console, with the wifi antenna on top of the AC duct near the shifter, the bluetooth antenna on the AC duct under the centre console The GPS unit on top of the DS to AC duct; they all seem to work OK there are are out of the way. Neat cable routing is a pain. For the drive recorder I mounted it near the rear view mirror and run the cable in the headlining, across the a pillar and then down the inside of the a pillar seal to the DS lower dash. From there it goes across and to one USB input for the unit. The second USB input is attached to the ECUtec OBD dongle and the 3rd goes to the USB bulkhead connected I added in the centre console. This is how the centre console looks "tidied" up Note I didn't install the provided speaker, didn't use the 2.5mm IPod in line or the piggyback loom for the Ipod or change any DIP switches; they seem to only be required if you need to use the Ipod input rather than the AUX input. That's it, install done, I'll follow up with a separate post on how the unit works, but in summary it retains all factory functions and inputs (so I still use my phone to the car for calls), reverse still works like factory etc.
×
×
  • Create New...