Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

CAR: 89 R32 GTR.

Problem:

The bell shaped metal housing that is attached to the firewall and to the piping for the clutch fluid reservoir has torn and all fluid clutch fluid leaked out. tear is pretty severe, much like a can being opened, inside i see a coil/spring of some description wrapped around a large metalic line or bar.

Obviously the clutch doesnt really disengage anymore and the pedal feel is far from normal, having very little resistance for the first half when depressed, then having a very firm spot which when depressed further causes a "ping" sound and the pedal to skip/drop a few centimeters before becoming firm again.

Questions:

1. Has a fluid leak caused the tear or has the tear caused the fluid leak? (fluid levels were fine 2 weeks ago when last checked)

2. How hard is it to get this fixed? Costs estimate?

3. What is function of the bell housing?

Any help would be much appreicated and apologies for the noobness of my descriptions. Thanks in advance.

Edited by SandalsBoy
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/204771-hoping-for-some-advice/
Share on other sites

x2 need a pic? not sure if you are descripbing the master cylinder, brake booster or the recess in the firewall? or something else altogether?

Here it is. Hope this angle will be what you need. Thanks guys. Appreicate you taking the time to read.

dscn1191pi2.jpg

Picture aint working for me, but it sounds like the clutch master cylinder which is an easy fix.

Two bolts fix it the to firewall, one bolt to back of clutch pedal in the pedal box (this ones fiddly), and one hydralic line to clutch slave cylinder - thats for an Rb30 anyhow. Bleeding the clutch afterwards will be the most fun part of the job.

Paid $40 for mine, will be a bit more for a skyline

Picture aint working for me, but it sounds like the clutch master cylinder which is an easy fix.

Two bolts fix it the to firewall, one bolt to back of clutch pedal in the pedal box (this ones fiddly), and one hydralic line to clutch slave cylinder - thats for an Rb30 anyhow. Bleeding the clutch afterwards will be the most fun part of the job.

Paid $40 for mine, will be a bit more for a skyline

Thanks for the reply mate. Sounds less serious than it looks. Can anyone who can see the picture verify that this is what has happened?

that's the clutch booster, not the clutch master cylinder that has broken - no idea how you've managed that (you might want to take a pic of the pedal and bracket inside the car too, it might have broken first.

its a bit of a pain to change but you should be able to pick one up second hand they are pretty reliable.

If you go to wreckers you might need to tell them its the clutch booster twice - I think its a bit unusual to have vacuum boost for the clutch, most cars only have it for the brakes. Might as well do the master cylinder at the same time they are pretty cheap.

that's the clutch booster, not the clutch master cylinder that has broken - no idea how you've managed that (you might want to take a pic of the pedal and bracket inside the car too, it might have broken first.

its a bit of a pain to change but you should be able to pick one up second hand they are pretty reliable.

If you go to wreckers you might need to tell them its the clutch booster twice - I think its a bit unusual to have vacuum boost for the clutch, most cars only have it for the brakes. Might as well do the master cylinder at the same time they are pretty cheap.

Thanks Duncan, appreicate the advice :P

Yah, its unbelievable. I hadn't even known a clutch have a booster - Haa :P

Hrmm any theories about how this could happen? Wouldnt want to replace it then have it reoccur. Prefer to find the cause of the problem rather than just fix the symptoms.

Bare in mind that all the clutch fluid has leaked out also... not sure if makes a difference.

well I was wondering what the pedal looks like, the clutch bracket itself can break which means you might have been pushing at a wierd angle = broken booster. But I've never seen this before.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah i found that alot of parts can be wrong or "very" hard to get the real right one. I already bought some brakes years ago on me "old" GT calipers and they were wrong too 😄  I told them too. Even send them pictures...but they said "EBC catalogue has them on my car... So i dont know what their answer will be. I call monday them and let them know that they are really not on my car. If they were they would be already on a car...
    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
×
×
  • Create New...