Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

just thought I should mention that early model series 1 stageas cannot run an unmodified R34 PFC.

It looks like in early 98 (probably the same time they release the r34 skyline) they changed the ECU wiring in stageas.

R34 GTT PFC will not run a pre 98 stagea without modification of the pins. It starts and then stalls straight away

the guys up at Hills Motorsport are working through it now but there are significant changes required

First problem is the CAS signal is in the wrong place

Second problem if you sort that, is the knock sensors are at a different pin. this is bad.

Will post up all the differences once we've got them sorted :cheers:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/205298-r34-pfc-doesnt-run-all-s1/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 82
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

just thought I should mention that early model series 1 stageas cannot run an unmodified R34 PFC.

It looks like in early 98 (probably the same time they release the r34 skyline) they changed the ECU wiring in stageas.

R34 GTT PFC will not run a pre 98 stagea without modification of the pins. It starts and then stalls straight away

the guys up at Hills Motorsport are working through it now but there are significant changes required

First problem is the CAS signal is in the wrong place

Second problem if you sort that, is the knock sensors are at a different pin. this is bad.

Will post up all the differences once we've got them sorted :cheers:

so...shouldnt you just use an R33 pfc ?

keep us updated please

* better hold off on the tune of mine then

that being said, Im still thinking about piggybacking it.

boostwerks have a bloke they will call in, a nissan wiring freak they reckon, so Im confident in my own way that a solution can be found.

good luck with it

Thanks Brendan I was going to give you a shout about the differences. Mine isn't sorted out yet maybe it will be the same. They are translating wiring diagrams at the moment. Glad I didn't try this one.

well.... I plugged my R34 GTT Power Fc into my 1997 Stagea today

runs for the first 3mins reasonably steady, but gradually starts to hunt for the idle, by the 2.30min mark she is hunting from 800 down to 300, then stalls,

cant get past that 3min mark without having to reset and retry.

but definately runs.

onlly errors on the PFc hand controller is "Boost" and "Thro", boost at 0.00v (just realized now I had the boost control kit option turned on, not off, oops) and thro at 5.11V

also I never made a change to the Airflow metre setting.

might go reinstall it, and setup the settings properly, see what happens

wonder if Neo injectors have different values than non-neo rb25 injectors, ie latency difference from 0.528msec to xxxx

this wont matter to me in the long run, as I have some S15 480cc highflowed to 550cc injectors, with 1.100msec latency. that will be setup at the tuners

along with the mod to stop the engine check light

if THRO is at the ceiling value 5.11v im not surprised its staling

the FC is being told the throttle position sensor is out of scale or disconnected

ive seen my GTST THRO drop to 0.0v and peg there - the FC locks the revs really high on idle around 1600rpm and keeps it there

i would suggest looking into why THRO isnt working - the car wont work without it

wonder if Neo injectors have different values than non-neo rb25 injectors, ie latency difference from 0.528msec to xxxx

this wont matter to me in the long run, as I have some S15 480cc highflowed to 550cc injectors, with 1.100msec latency. that will be setup at the tuners

along with the mod to stop the engine check light

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/In...es-t173670.html

if THRO is at the ceiling value 5.11v im not surprised its staling

the FC is being told the throttle position sensor is out of scale or disconnected

ive seen my GTST THRO drop to 0.0v and peg there - the FC locks the revs really high on idle around 1600rpm and keeps it there

i would suggest looking into why THRO isnt working - the car wont work without it

is THRO the TPS signal?

if so, I believe it needs a rewire.

ie throttle motor sensor signal pin# is different on R34 GTT PowerFC vs Stagea ecu

#51 compared to Blank

whereas all other Throttle signal pins are the same #

I think what your talking about is the throttle motor, which is only on the R34 GTT, and I believe it's used by the traction control system.

If I remember correctly Andy (EGA41T) called the fix "The secret squirrel tweak", do a search for that and you should find your answer.

yup

was pretty sure that was the case

cheers Brendan

already got the diode, resistor and wire, plus the diagram of course

cool. its definately going to work

will book a day I suppose and get all the work done.

550cc deatchwerks injectors (hiflowed 480cc items)

hks heavy duty actuator

stock bov, oil, filter

powerfc + boostcontrol kit + secret squirrel trick

splitfire coilpacks + .8mm copper sparkies

(Id put most on myself, but cant be stuffed leaning over the engine; just ruins my knees = not worth it)

I think what your talking about is the throttle motor, which is only on the R34 GTT, and I believe it's used by the traction control system.

If I remember correctly Andy (EGA41T) called the fix "The secret squirrel tweak", do a search for that and you should find your answer.

ok if thats the case then in SENSOR SW CHECK should have TPS and THRO

do you have both >?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...