Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Yahoo!

because mines an odd length, do you think i'd need to send it away to get it measured properly? or could it be done without sending it away?

i was wanting to do this when i was holding the one kris put in the Mines 34gtr out here it was quiet nice!

Yahoo!

because mines an odd length, do you think i'd need to send it away to get it measured properly? or could it be done without sending it away?

Or.................. *you* could measure it up? :ninja::)

For $2k landed, put me down for one (R32 GTR) if anyone is going to organise a group buy :)

:merli:

yeah i think i will pull it out today and get the woman to measure it up.. haha

a group buy is on order!! i'd organise it if we can get a few numbers!

ok

i've emailed them for prices on 10, 20 and 30.

Edited by Angus Smart
surely some people will want this?

maybe we can do a dyno test before and after carbon shaft.

there would be a difference correct?

No. Or atleast there shouldn't be. The only reason to record a difference would be if the dyno wasn't being set up or run correctly.

We will start manufacturing one peice carbon fibre shafts for the R32 GTR as soon as we have refined our custom made m300 yokes.

I didn't think there would be much of of a market in Australia for them....

Will post up details when production has started. about 2 months around 2,000 AUD. Higher spec then ATCP / Trust / rebadge / rebadge

Good for up to 1000HP 10,000 RPM

PM if you want more details

Rob

We will start manufacturing one peice carbon fibre shafts for the R32 GTR as soon as we have refined our custom made m300 yokes.

I didn't think there would be much of of a market in Australia for them....

Will post up details when production has started. about 2 months around 2,000 AUD. Higher spec then ATCP / Trust / rebadge / rebadge

Good for up to 1000HP 10,000 RPM

PM if you want more details

Rob

"We" being.......... who exactly?

Indicative time frame till production?

We will start manufacturing one peice carbon fibre shafts for the R32 GTR as soon as we have refined our custom made m300 yokes.

I didn't think there would be much of of a market in Australia for them....

Will post up details when production has started. about 2 months around 2,000 AUD. Higher spec then ATCP / Trust / rebadge / rebadge

Good for up to 1000HP 10,000 RPM

PM if you want more details

Rob

ok interesting.. yes Moar details!

the us dollar is looking pretty sweet right now Atcp may have our business!

wouldn't the map look more responsive with a carbon shaft installed?

No.

There are bundles of misunderstandings about light weight drive train components. Some people reckon they destroy the driveability & low range torque of a motor.

Others believe the low rotational inertia produces masses more acceleration.

What is true that if the lower drive train inertia isn't factored into the dyno readings it will give a false, high, output number.

Also true is that a lightweight driveshaft (much like its flywheel equivalent) will reduce the amount of energy (or horsepower over time if you like) required to accelerate the car. Whether this is important or significant depends on a bundle of factors. I would suspect that a good carbon drive shaft would have a small & perhaps measureable effect.

We being RAF Engineering.

WA based company.

Can't give exact date on production run start but should be with in 2 months total. I want to ensure full testing, safety and material QS are above what is currently avaliable.

NATA will be doing some of our final testing.

Website will be up in in 3 weeks.

We are also making billet / carbon fibre Lat links too.

Also as stated above Atcp will be a lower spec then the one we will producing.

Also we are a australian based company using australian made raw materials.

PM box is full send emails to [email protected]

ok interesting.. yes Moar details!

the us dollar is looking pretty sweet right now Atcp may have our business!

USD is actually pretty average at the moment. the AUD is going pretty well though (which I gather is what you mean?).

a carbon shaft will most likely have less effect than a lightweight clutch and flywheel. it's simple nerd talk. flywheel and clutch are large diameter out from the crank, which means any benefit of lightening way out there is multiplied. one of the gingerbeers on here can explain it more succintly i'm sure. but with the shaft being quite small in diameter the weight removed is not far out from that centre of rotation. the plus side is you do save a fair bit of weight.

and seriously I reckon 2 or 3 max would be in on this.

USD is actually pretty average at the moment. the AUD is going pretty well though (which I gather is what you mean?).

a carbon shaft will most likely have less effect than a lightweight clutch and flywheel. it's simple nerd talk. flywheel and clutch are large diameter out from the crank, which means any benefit of lightening way out there is multiplied. one of the gingerbeers on here can explain it more succintly i'm sure. but with the shaft being quite small in diameter the weight removed is not far out from that centre of rotation. the plus side is you do save a fair bit of weight.

and seriously I reckon 2 or 3 max would be in on this.

Does that make me a ginger beer or a nerd, Baron? Maybe both.

The term you are seeking is the polar moment of inertia. J for short. For a hollow round section

Polar moment of inertia = pi/32 multiplied by (outside diameter to the fourth power - inside diameter to the fourth power)

Anyway for a small increase in diameter you get a big increase in torque transmission capacity.

On the flip side the metal at the centre of the shaft is doing next to fk all.

Question to Syslink. Which NATA accredited mob are you getting to do your testing, not Metlabs by chance?

Edited by djr81

either way its still weight i want to get rid of as thats my main goal for now.

and on the plus side, single piece shaft rather than the current.

and barron, a light weight clutch/flywheel would be somewhere 5x (+++) the cost of the shaft correct?

either way its still weight i want to get rid of as thats my main goal for now.

and on the plus side, single piece shaft rather than the current.

and barron, a light weight clutch/flywheel would be somewhere 5x (+++) the cost of the shaft correct?

Most Jap branded twin plate clutches come with a "lightened flywheel", and will set you back approx $1500.

You can get a super-dooper carbon clutch and super-dooper lightweight unobtainium flywheel for upwards for $10,000 though.

Most Jap branded twin plate clutches come with a "lightened flywheel", and will set you back approx $1500.

You can get a super-dooper carbon clutch and super-dooper lightweight unobtainium flywheel for upwards for $10,000 though.

yeah i've got an OS unit now i'm sure its good, cost a fair bit

but yes the $10000 was more to what i ment in the previous post.

Edited by Angus Smart

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I'm looking for some real world experiences/feed back from anyone who has personally ran a EFR7670 with a 1.05 exhaust housing or a .83 I'm leaning towards the .83 because its a street car used mostly for spirited driving in the canyons roads. I"m not looking for big numbers on paper. I want a responsive powerband that will be very linear to 8000 rpm. I dont mind if power remains somewhat flat but dont want power to drop off on top. The turbo I've purchased is a 1.05, although the mounting flange T3 vs T4 and internal vs external waste gates are different on both housings, I not concern about swapping parts or making fabrication mods to get what I want. Based on some of the research I've done with chat gpt, the 1.05 housing seems to be the way to go with slightly more lag and future proofing for more mods but recommends .83 for best response/street car setup. AI doesn't have the same emotions as real people driving a GTR so I think you guys will be able to give me better feed back 😀   
    • Surely somebody has one in VIC. Have you asked at any shops?  Is this the yearly inspection or did you get a canary?
    • This is where I share pain with you, @Duncan. The move to change so many cooling system pieces to plastic is a killer! Plastic end tanks and a few plastic hose flanges on my car's fail after so little time.  Curious about the need for a bigger rad, is that just for long sessions in the summer or because the car generally needs more cooling?
    • So, that is it! It is a pretty expensive process with the ATF costing 50-100 per 5 litres, and a mechanic will probably charge plenty because they don't want to do it. Still, considering how dirty my fluid was at 120,000klm I think it would be worth doing more like every 80,000 to keep the trans happy, they are very expensive to replace. The job is not that hard if you have the specialist tools so you can save a bit of money and do it yourself!
    • OK, onto filling. So I don't really have any pics, but will describe the process as best I can. The USDM workshop manual also covers it from TM-285 onwards. First, make sure the drain plug (17mm) is snug. Not too tight yet because it is coming off again. Note it does have a copper washer that you could replace or anneal (heat up with a blow torch) to seal nicely. Remove the fill plug, which has an inhex (I think it was 6mm but didn't check). Then, screw in the fill fitting, making sure it has a suitable o-ring (mine came without but I think it is meant to be supplied). It is important that you only screw it in hand tight. I didn't get a good pic of it, but the fill plug leads to a tube about 70mm long inside the transmission. This sets the factory level for fluid in the trans (above the join line for the pan!) and will take about 3l to fill. You then need to connect your fluid pump to the fitting via a hose, and pump in whatever amount of fluid you removed (maybe 3 litres, in my case 7 litres). If you put in more than 3l, it will spill out when you remove the fitting, so do quickly and with a drain pan underneath. Once you have pumped in the required amount of clean ATF, you start the engine and run it for 3 minutes to let the fluid circulate. Don't run it longer and if possible check the fluid temp is under 40oC (Ecutek shows Auto Trans Fluid temp now, or you could use an infrared temp gun on the bottom of the pan). The manual stresses the bit about fluid temperature because it expands when hot an might result in an underfil. So from here, the factory manual says to do the "spill and fill" again, and I did. That is, put an oil pan under the drain plug and undo it with a 17mm spanner, then watch your expensive fluid fall back out again, you should get about 3 litres.  Then, put the drain plug back in, pump 3 litres back in through the fill plug with the fitting and pump, disconnect the fill fitting and replace the fill plug, start the car and run for another 3 minutes (making sure the temp is still under 40oC). The manual then asks for a 3rd "spill and fill" just like above. I also did that and so had put 13l in by now.  This time they want you to keep the engine running and run the transmission through R and D (I hope the wheels are still off the ground!) for a while, and allow the trans temp to get to 40oC, then engine off. Finally, back under the car and undo the fill plug to let the overfill drain out; it will stop running when fluid is at the top of the levelling tube. According to the factory, that is job done! Post that, I reconnected the fill fitting and pumped in an extra 0.5l. AMS says 1.5l overfill is safe, but I started with less to see how it goes, I will add another 1.0 litres later if I'm still not happy with the hot shifts.
×
×
  • Create New...