Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

If you want fun and are prepared to spend a fair bit on ongoing maintenance, get the 32 GTR. If you want a new, smooth, reliable daily get the 34 GTT.

I was faced with the same choice and even though the 32 GTR has been a dream car for years, I went the 33. The last car I had was 15 years old and I was sick of replacing bits so the newness factor won out.

person in my office selling r32..but its in bankstown dnt know this guy personally but looks like bargain for r32 gtr

http://www.carsales.com.au/used-cars/priva...0&trecs=364

mate that thing sold for 18k

Buy a GTR for 20k, drive it for a few months, then put wheels on it and maybe exhaust, the motor then breaks and you've got to rebuild an RB26, then here comes a nice fat bill which will blow your 30k budget right out of the water

but you don't

you buy a fully rebuilt 32 for $30K that already has every mod you could ever want, and then live happily ever after

...and then live happily ever after

surely if you have ever owned any car, you would know that this ideal never happens

you have to factor in the kind of repairs that an "average" example of the car you're buying would need, and then decide if you can afford it

Totally agree mate. But we can't EXPECT his motor to die. It's safer to assume it needs a rebuild, especially seeing as a new owner will be excitedly thrashing about, but the turbos will be on their last legs for sure.

If you want comfy, cleaner and hassle free daily driving get the GTT (i would). But if you are serious on performance and don't mind refurbishing the GTR (which would make it nicer to own anyway), even rebuilding the motor just to be safe, then fork out $20k and set aside another $10k for renovation on the GTR.

Both choices have their merits. You decide.

With that budget a GTR just isnt going to heppen if the motor has problems, or if it say, starts breaking cv joints, or the gearbox dies, or if it needs a new clutch etc

hey comming from a 93 180sx with light mods which is a similar age to the 32 gtr it is a dream to drive a 34 smooth and no rattles. my 2c

Hahahahaha, i hope you were drunk when you posted that :laugh:

hey guys (and girls), im looking at buying a skyline but not sure if i want a r32gtr or r34 gtt(manual, turbo, coupe), i know the gtr will have more power but they are pretty old now and im thinking r34 would be more reliable and just newer, iv got bout 25 to 30 grand to spend, any suggestions.

Hi Charlie,

I'm 59 years old (nearly as old as Jim Richards), and I've owned both an R33 GTR and currently an R34 GTR. I've also organised GTR/GTST/GTT drive days and have plusses and minuses that you might like to play with. I've owned about 20 cars in my 40 years of driving incl. BMWs, Alfetta GTV, Datsuns (starting with a new 1600)

Lets assume that you're getting a manual with turbo coupe.

The plus side of an R34 GTT is that i) they're new with less Kms ii) they have an in your face styling iii) this is the model that won the NZ Targa in 2007 and 2006 beating Porsches/Stis/EVOs/V8s iv) turbo wear is likely to be less than an older GTR v) suspension/bushes/boots/gear box wear will probably be less vi) brakes are better than what's standard on an R32 GTR

The minus side of an R34 GTT is that i) depreciation will be more than a good GTR whether it's an R33 or R32 ii) it won't corner as well as a GTR

The plus side of an R32 GTR is that providing you have one in mind with a complete service history since its arrival in Aust, and it has low Kms as proven by a raft of what's shown on past pink slips over the years (since the odometer can be tampered with) (and don't trust my 58 year old honest face) i) it has as I said a really low depreciation in value) ii) its dynamics and behaviour on the road is superior (except for its braking ability) iii) it turns more heads iv) if its been looked after, it'll look after you better over time v) it's a classic car and classic cars will always be remembered the longest - they've even made a dvd on Bathurst 1991/1992

The minus side of an R32 GTR is i) the brakes are worth upgrading ii) check with a specialist Skyline workshop and pay him to look the car over for MVA damage, wear and tear, leaks, sticky sensors, turbo play unless you're willing to risk it. An Aussie landed R32 GTR will cost too much but...

Also consider if you want to carry 4 people in comfort the only GTR that can do this and still fit your budget is a low Km R33 GTR! A survey has been done on looks of the 3 GTRs so far made (not including the R35), and the R34 and R32 GTRs rated about 33 and 38%. But when the 29% poor brother R33 GTR was considered on the basis that one had to pretend that the GTST had never existed, the R33 GTR style jumped by up by 4% to 33%.

Anyway you pick between the 3 or 2 of them, you'll thoroughly enjoy the experience - welcome to the club!!!

i know the gtr will have more power but they are pretty old now and im thinking r34 would be more reliable and just newer
That gotta be the best reason why he should choose the GTT over the GTR. Factory power is the same.

Was just correcting him....

I originally wanted a 32 GTR, but went for a 34GTT for the reasons outlined here many times over.

I must say in general terms the GTT is a more comfortable car to be in for 'normal' driving at least.

I'm still thinking about buying a 32 GTR - but to take my time restoring it from the ground up, and in the way I want it to be. In the meantime, I have the GTT to enjoy... I think this is the best solution for me anyway :)

i know the 'claimed' factory power is the same but surely the gtr would have more than the gt-t, didn't they have some sort of agreement in japan that limits the power(on paper) to 206kw, not sure its just what i've heard

I think the GTR has more torque???...... but as we all know torque and power aren't the same thing, and noone mentioned torque :nyaanyaa:

:D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • See if you can thermal epoxy a heatsink or two onto it?
    • The other problem was one of those "oh shit we are going to die moments". Basically the high spec Q50s have a full electric steering rack, and the povo ones had a regular hydraulic rack with an electric pump.  So couple of laps into session 5 as I came into turn 2 (big run off now, happily), the dash turned into a christmas tree and the steering became super heavy and I went well off. I assumed it was a tyre failure so limped to the pits, but everything was OK. But....the master warning light was still on so I checked the DTCs and saw – C13E6 “Heat Protection”. Yes, that bloody steering rack computer sitting where the oil cooler should be has its own sensors and error logic, and decided I was using the steering wheel too much. I really appreciated the helpful information in the manual (my bold) POSSIBLE CAUSE • Continuing the overloading steering (Sports driving in the circuit etc,) “DATA MONITOR” >> “C/M TEMPERATURE”. The rise of steering force motor internal temperature caused the protection function to operate. This is not a system malfunction. INSPECTION END So, basically the electric motor in the steering rack got to 150c, and it decided to shut down without warning for my safety. Didn't feel safe. Short term I'll see if I can duct some air to that motor (the engine bay is sealed pretty tight). Long term, depending on how often this happens, I'll look into swapping the povo spec electric/hydraulic rack in. While the rack should be fine the power supply to the pump will be a pain and might be best to deal with it when I add a PDM.
    • And finally, 2 problems I really need to sort.  Firstly as Matt said the auto trans is not happy as it gets hot - I couldn't log the temps but the gauge showed 90o. On the first day I took it out back in Feb, because the coolant was getting hot I never got to any auto trans issues; but on this day by late session 3 and then really clearly in 4 and 5 as it got hotter it just would not shift up. You can hear the issue really clearly at 12:55 and 16:20 on the vid. So the good news is, literally this week Ecutek finally released tuning for the jatco 7 speed. I'll have a chat to Racebox and see what they can do electrically to keep it cooler and to get the gears, if anything. That will likely take some R&D and can only really happen on track as it never gets even warm with road use. I've also picked up some eye wateringly expensive Redline D6 ATF to try, it had the highest viscosity I could find at 100o so we will see if that helps (just waiting for some oil pan gaskets so I can change it properly). If neither of those work I need to remove the coolant/trans interwarmer and the radiator cooler and go to an external cooler....somewhere.....(goodbye washer reservoir?), and if that fails give up on this mad idea and wait for Nissan to release the manual 400R
    • So, what else.... Power. I don't know what it is making because I haven't done a post tune dyno run yet; I will when I get a chance. It was 240rwkw dead stock. Conclusion from the day....it does not need a single kw more until I sort some other stuff. It comes on so hard that I could hear the twin N1 turbos on the R32 crying, and I just can't use what it has around a tight track with the current setup. Brakes. They are perfect. Hit them hard all day and they never felt like having an issue; you can see in the video we were making ground on much lighter cars on better tyres under brakes. They are standard (red sport) calipers, standard size discs in DBA5000 2 piece, Winmax pads and Motul RBF600 fluid, all from Matty at Racebrakes Sydney. Keeping in mind the car is more powerful than my R32 and weighs 1780, he clearly knows his shit. Suspension. This is one of the first areas I need to change. It has electronically controlled dampers from factory, but everything is just way too soft for track work even on the hardest setting (it is nice when hustling on country roads though). In particular it rolls into oversteer mid corner and pitches too much under hard braking so it becomes unstable eg in the turn 1 kink I need to brake early, turn through the kink then brake again so I don't pirouette like an AE86. I need to get some decent shocks with matched springs and sway bars ASAP, even if it is just a v1 setup until I work out a proper race/rally setup later. Tyres. I am running Yoko A052 in 235/45/18 all round, because that was what I could get in approximately the right height on wheels I had in the shed (Rays/Nismo 18x8 off the old Leaf actually!). As track tyres they are pretty poor; I note GTSBoy recently posted a porker comparo video including them where they were about the same as AD09.....that is nothing like a top line track tyre. I'll start getting that sorted but realistically I should get proper sized wheels first (likely 9.5 +38 front and 11 +55 at the rear, so a custom order, and I can't rotate them like the R32), then work out what the best tyre option is. BTW on that, Targa Tas had gone to road tyres instead of semi slicks now so that is a whole other world of choices to sort. Diff. This is the other thing that urgently needs to be addressed. It left massive 1s out of the fish hook all day, even when I was trying not too (you can also hear it reving on the video, and see the RPM rising too fast compared to speed in the data). It has an open diff that Infiniti optimistically called a B-LSD for "Brake Limited Slip Diff". It does good straight line standing start 11s but it is woeful on the track. Nismo seem to make a 2 way for it.
    • Also, I logged some data from the ECU for each session (mostly oil pressures and various temps, but also speed, revs etc, can't believe I forgot accelerator position). The Ecutek data loads nicely to datazap, I got good data from sessions 2, 3 and 4: https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-2?log=0&data=7 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-3?log=0&data=6 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-4?log=0&data=6 Each session is cut into 3 files but loaded together, you can change between them in the top left. As the test sessions are mostly about the car, not me, I basically start by checking the oil pressure (good, or at least consistent all day). These have an electrically controlled oil pump which targets 25psi(!) at low load and 50 at high. I'm running a much thicker oil than recommended by nissan (they said 0w20, I'm running 10w40) so its a little higher. The main thing is that it doesn't drop too far, eg in the long left hand fish hook, or under brakes so I know I'm not getting oil surge. Good start. Then Oil and Coolant temp, plus intercooler and intake temps, like this: Keeping in mind ambient was about 5o at session 2, I'd say the oil temp is good. The coolant temp as OK but a big worry for hot days (it was getting to 110 back in Feb when it was 35o) so I need to keep addressing that. The water to air intercooler is working totally backwards where we get 5o air in the intake, squish/warm it in the turbos (unknown temp) then run it through the intercoolers which are say 65o max in this case, then the result is 20o air into the engine......the day was too atypical to draw a conclusion on that I think, in the united states of freedom they do a lot of upsizing the intercooler and heat exchanger cores to get those temps down but they were OK this time. The other interesting (but not concerning) part for me was the turbo speed vs boost graph: I circled an example from the main straight. With the tune boost peaks at around 18psi but it deliberately drops to about 14psi at redline because the turbos are tiny - they choke at high revs and just create more heat than power if you run them hard all the way. But you can also see the turbo speed at the same time; it raises from about 180,000rpm to 210,000rpm which the boost falls....imagine the turbine speed if they held 18psi to redline. The wastegates are electrically controlled so there is a heap of logic about boost target, actual boost, delta etc etc but it all seems to work well
×
×
  • Create New...