Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey all,

Need alot of help here. When the car is running in 4WD, at the begining when I start up the car (engine is cold), the 4WD works fine.

As the car heats up, in matter of 10 mins or so... the car is jolting during acceleration.

Ive changed the 4WD pump. and also changed 4WD computer. And still the same. WHAT IS GOING ON?

And this is defenetly the 4WD, cos I took the 4WD fuse out and ran it on RWD and it drives like a dream.

But i want it in 4WD to be the same. Has anyone come accross this? Will appreciate any advise.

Cheers Zac

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/207699-unusual-4wd-problem/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

have you checked the attesa pump and fluid in your boot...i have a R32 GTS4 which is pretty much the samt awd system and when u start hitting boost the awd guage starts to go up. Therefor ur attesa pump is rooted or u may have low/no attesa fluid left.

hope this helps

vinnie

have you checked the attesa pump and fluid in your boot...i have a R32 GTS4 which is pretty much the samt awd system and when u start hitting boost the awd guage starts to go up. Therefor ur attesa pump is rooted or u may have low/no attesa fluid left.

hope this helps

vinnie

Yea I actually replace the Attesa pump and bleed it and all that. The fluid in my boot is in level. I will double check.

Too right! I have lost count of how many times this point has been made - AWD NISSANS MUST HAVE THE SAME ROLLING DIAMETER ON ALL 4 CORNERS.

I never thought about that. So are you saying that this could be the reason for my car jolting when accellerating???

Could it having anything to do with the oil in my gear box or transfer case? I have red line oil in there. Could the grade of the oil make a difference?

I never thought about that. So are you saying that this could be the reason for my car jolting when accellerating???

No he is saying that it IS the reason.

Could it having anything to do with the oil in my gear box or transfer case? I have red line oil in there. Could the grade of the oil make a difference?

No.

Thanks alot for all your help guys. Im gona get the tyres changed immediately.. And will let you know the outcome. Cheers Zac.

Hi Guys,

Just went to the car and double checked the tyre size for fronts and back..

Fronts - 245/40/18

Rears - 265/35/18

Can you guys just confirm again that it is defenetly the tyres that causing this stupid jolting problem for me. And can you explain to me why and how this is happening.

Appreciate your help guys .Cheers

Pull the fuse on the 4WD system & go for a drive. If the problem has gone then it is your tyres.

Much of the input for the system is differential wheel speed front to rear. If the system detects it it thinks wheelspin & pushes torque forward. This is almost certainly the cause of the jolting as the locked up system & differential wheel speeds need to somehow get back to normal - hence the car jolts.

What is your front torque gauge reading when you drive around normally?

Pull the fuse on the 4WD system & go for a drive. If the problem has gone then it is your tyres.

Much of the input for the system is differential wheel speed front to rear. If the system detects it it thinks wheelspin & pushes torque forward. This is almost certainly the cause of the jolting as the locked up system & differential wheel speeds need to somehow get back to normal - hence the car jolts.

What is your front torque gauge reading when you drive around normally?

Thanks Guys.

It's definitely the tyres

Fronts - 245/40/18
sidewall = 98mm
Rears - 265/35/18
sidewall = 92.75mm

So, rear tyre has a smaller rolling diameter. This means that the rears turn faster than the fronts. ATTESSA sees this as "wheel spin", and sends some drive to the fronts.

It's definitely the tyres

sidewall = 98mm

sidewall = 92.75mm

So, rear tyre has a smaller rolling diameter. This means that the rears turn faster than the fronts. ATTESSA sees this as "wheel spin", and sends some drive to the fronts.

I replaced the tyres at the back...to be the same as the front tyres. And wahlahhh... the jolting had ended. BUT when I was boosting it up ....there was still quite a slighhhht jolt...i guess im noticing it cos I know it. But it was still there. I want it to be smoooth ass...What needs to be done???

im gettin brand new tyres put all around.... 265/35/18 front and back this week.

Appreciate the help.

The diameters are obviously the same. The offset is probably not so important (at least in a straight line).

The tyre fitter should be able to measure the widths (although that info is usually cast on the inside of the rim). I'm only guessing here, but if you are already running different width tyres front and rear, then it is likely the rims are different widths front and rear.

The rims really need to be the same all round, otherwise you can spend hours working out what combination of tyres (makes / models / sizes) will give the desired equal rolling diameters.

This is what happens when you go for "the look" without regard to the technology underlying the performance.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...