Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Once again its the 'Nissan Turbo'.

What bout the story with Ian Luff i think his name was, with the 32 GTR with '500 KW of power'. Looked like a very mildly worked example to me.

"all P plate drivers are hoons'

bah

*insert angry face here*

  • Replies 95
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

so you can't do anything stupid, its only stupid if you get caught? Which means driving at 140 through a school zone sideways isn't stupid?

But it is if you get caught?

hmmm lol

Originally posted by choochoobaa

it was on the news saying that he was drivin a 200sx. but the main point of the story was that police are thinkin of canceling your licence on the spot if you go 45 over the limit. and they said something about not letting p platers drive performance cars in the future.

in vic it's 25k's over and you lose your license for a month! 20 over in a 110 zone (or maybe 100+ zone - not sure) and you lose it.

my boss lost his license for a year for doing 100 in a 60 zone in his brand new M3

A guy was "lapping" and dragging as all the P-platers seem to do here in Hobart on Wednesday, and (I'm guessing) was doing the "royal flyby" in his T-18 shitbox, in the centre of town, in a 50 zone, over 100kmh, down the wrong lane and directly through a red light and into a 50 year old blokes car going through the green. The old bloke was killed. The 2 p-platers were still alive last I heard. I hope they get bent over by the cops on this, if they live.

Could have been the same thing with this farkstick.

cheers,

floody

You should have seen the Ten news report.

He stated that the inexperienced 18 y.o. was driving a deadly turbo powered Nissan "missile" similar to one shown here...

cue clip of a lowered skirted BBS wheeled red S15 doing a fully s1k heli...

Man, I just broke up laughing...

T.

Originally posted by NisMojo

I am sick of the way Reporters and police generalise "turbo sports car" Drivers...

He was doin 175 cause he knows he can...

Yeah... He's on his P plates and been driving for 2-3 years...

He knows EXACTLY what he can and can't do behind a wheel... Hell, with all that experience, we should licence him to drive 250km/h in 60 zones :(uh.gif

"He was doin 175 cause he knows he can..."

Gimme a break!!! slap.gif

His P plates indicate he's "Pathetic".

I don't agree that speed limits should vary from driver to driver. I like the idea that the law should be applied fairly and equally. It's not the speed that your worried about, it's the braking your worried about. There's a massive difference braking between 100km/h to 0km/h in a 200SX and 60km/h to 0 km/h in a normal Falcon/Commodore. My money is on the Falcon/commodore to stop on time.

We own a shop out in Minto and Airds Rd is right behind us. It's an industral area and there are illegal drag races there.

i got done last night for speeding for the first time in the 2 years i had my licence, i was delivering pizzas in my shitter and trhey got me 85km/h in a 60 zone, no p plates, they didnt notice but both front tyres are down to the radial and the windscreen is cracked badly...

they let me off with a tickt for $127 being uder 15km/h over the limit... who says cops are all bad?

the other day my mate in his drift180sx got pulled over doing 87km/h in a 50 zone and they did him for 15 over... maybe i have a good area but i am impressed with police lately.

Evan

Originally posted by rb20-calais

i got done last night for speeding for the first time in the 2 years i had my licence, i was delivering pizzas in my shitter and trhey got me 85km/h in a 60 zone, no p plates, they didnt notice but both front tyres are down to the radial and the windscreen is cracked badly...

they let me off with a tickt for $127 being uder 15km/h over the limit... who says cops are all bad?

the other day my mate in his drift180sx got pulled over doing 87km/h in a 50 zone and they did him for 15 over... maybe i have a good area but i am impressed with police lately.

Evan

I know you'll take immediate offence at this post, but don't. Read it twice before you reply please.

So you're "impressed" with the Police because they let you off for breaking the law? You do realise that braking is a function of traction don't you? If you have metal wheels (if you're on your steel belts), you're not going to stop ANYWHERE near as fast as if you had brand new slicks on (extremes to illustrate the point).

So really, in all fairness, your car is quite dangerous with those tyres on there, agreed? Would you have the same level of admiration for the Police if they defected your car for having unroadworthy tyres and a cracked windscreen, like they should have?

I'm constantly surprised by what factors people judge police on. If they let them off for minor speeding offences, the Police are doing a GREAT JOB!!!! If they rape you for street racing your mates up and down George St/Chapel St/Cavill Ave (!), then they're dirty cops...

Weird isn't it?

i agree to an extent andrew. looking beyond what the boys in blue do to protect us from unroadworthy cars though, they are the ones that we call on when our lives are in danger.

but it pisses me off no end when they are overly suspiscious or worst still, abuse that power. last night for instance, i was driving my g/f home at around 2am and i passed a paddy wagon travelling the other way. they proceeded to do a U turn at the next intersection and tail gate me for the next few kilometres. i had enough so i slowed down, pulled into the left lane and they proceeded to go past me, slowly, they peered into the car and turned left infront of me at the next available opportunity.

now in one way im grateful to them, they would've probably done a number plate check to see if the car was stolen, but what if they pulled me over for a random breathe check for the sake of being overly suspiscious? i have no time for this shit, i wanted to get home as soon as i could because i was tired. if i was in any other car besides from a sports car they would'nt have had second thoughts.

so my point is, i think the general consensus within performance car enthusiasts is they are bastards when they appear to abuse that power. id like to think that everyone had respect for them for the job they try to do.

Originally posted by Merli

I know you'll take immediate offence at this post, but don't. Read it twice before you reply please.

So you're "impressed" with the Police because they let you off for breaking the law? You do realise that braking is a function of traction don't you? If you have metal wheels (if you're on your steel belts), you're not going to stop ANYWHERE near as fast as if you had brand new slicks on (extremes to illustrate the point).

So really, in all fairness, your car is quite dangerous with those tyres on there, agreed? Would you have the same level of admiration for the Police if they defected your car for having unroadworthy tyres and a cracked windscreen, like they should have?

I'm constantly surprised by what factors people judge police on. If they let them off for minor speeding offences, the Police are doing a GREAT JOB!!!! If they rape you for street racing your mates up and down George St/Chapel St/Cavill Ave (!), then they're dirty cops...

Weird isn't it?

:werd:

I cant believe anyone on here would defend 170km/h in a 60 zone as "hes doing it because he knows he can" and "hes got a better car therefore he should be allowed to"

WHAAAATT?

There is no other phrase to describe the above act than "ABSOLUTE F'UCKING STUPIDITY". As for the "oh and i suppose youve never gone over the limit" crowd, get real. Theres a big difference between doing 70 in a 60 and 170 in a 60.

Anyone who defends this f'ucking muppet deserves the same punishment he gets.

Red17

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Kapr Haha yeah thats the one. I missed that you had a built up engine, I wouldn't want to run it on there either then. It was good in my situation just to replace the original turbo on a stock engine. @MBS206Yep definitely not a replacement for anything name brand
    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
×
×
  • Create New...