Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Gt...l&hl=GT2871

225rwkW @ 13psi. Responsive, torquey, easy to drive. Good upgrade, but I don't know how it compares to the HKS 2530 as I haven't driven a Skyline so equipped. Anyone who's driven mine is never unimpressed though.

Best suggestion I would have if you went to the 2871 is to acquire the Garrett unit and transplant the HKS turbine housing onto it to make it all bolt on easily.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/208481-2871-on-rb25det/#findComment-3688189
Share on other sites

Hmmmm.. Im getting 229rwkw @ 13psi with my 2530 at the moment and was looking to upgrade to the 2781 for 280~rwkw. Doesn't this turbo rate much higher than 225kw? I thought around 280-300??

http://www.turbobygarrett.com/turbobygarre...rison_sheet.htm states that the turbo is rated from 250 (186kw) to 475hp (354kw)

I understand what you are saying about the housing. Either i get a stock turbo housing or use the HKS one?

Edited by SkyDragon
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/208481-2871-on-rb25det/#findComment-3688221
Share on other sites

There are three compressor trim specifications for the 2871. I'd say that for any of them the turbine would be the stumbling block from a mass flow perspective if you wanted better than 250rwkW. I'd say your HKS housing would provide a definite flow advantage. Buy a complete Garrett turbocharger, remove the T25 flanged turbine housing, and swap in the T3 flanged HKS housing. If you ran the 52 trim version, then you would have created a GT-RS.

Without getting into any of the max power debates, the 2871 is a good unit, but a 48 trim may not be a massive step forwards from the HKS unit you're currently running. Also maybe not quite the right spec you'd want if chasing 280rwkW. Something out of the HKS Pro S range, or a Garrett GT30 IW based unit would be my preference for that type of output.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/208481-2871-on-rb25det/#findComment-3688387
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Pulling up and old thread but with a related question -

I have a new 2871r and HKS 2530 housings.

My plan is to use the 2871 (GT-RS spec - 52 trim, 0.6a/r) with the HKS 0.64 T3 exhaust housing.

Is there a chance I will run into compressor surge issues on an rb25?

Has anyone done this and had good results?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/208481-2871-on-rb25det/#findComment-5033898
Share on other sites

Considering you've got the same spec as a GT-RS, look at the results others have achieved with them.

Expect good results on-road, and don't worry about surge with either the 48 or 52 trim cartridges. The larger 56T would probably warrant use of a larger turbine.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/208481-2871-on-rb25det/#findComment-5035054
Share on other sites

so if you have the RB specific HKS GTRS kit can you confirm what AR the T3 rear housing is? not that i dont trust HKS but id be a lil :) if its a .63

yet from what ive seen its such a gun turbo to have onroad.... guaranteed 250rwkw and massive area under the curve... excellent power delivery too.. Ooooh so tempting

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/208481-2871-on-rb25det/#findComment-5037468
Share on other sites

so if you have the RB specific HKS GTRS kit can you confirm what AR the T3 rear housing is? not that i dont trust HKS but id be a lil :) if its a .63

yet from what ive seen its such a gun turbo to have onroad.... guaranteed 250rwkw and massive area under the curve... excellent power delivery too.. Ooooh so tempting

OF COURSE it's gonna be .63 or thereabouts, especially knowing HKS generally put quite small housings on turbos. No point putting a T3 .82 housing on a little turbo like that IMO.

The GT3071R is a much more efficient turbo AND comes already with a T3 flange so will bolt on to stock manifold with a spacer plate and either weld external gate flange to stock manifold or get an I/W turbine housing. Instead of making 250rwkw on 18-20psi like a 2871, u might make 250 on only 1 bar and have potential for more power down the track.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/208481-2871-on-rb25det/#findComment-5037593
Share on other sites

really quite pointless putting a 0.64 AR rear housing on, will eventually just choke the whole lot.

you have an RB, i'd really not be worried too much about the 64 rear.

I'll be buying a 2871R with a 52 trim front and a 0.86 rear for my SR20. the lag difference is really nominal between them, and if you're really worried about lag, just slap some bigger cams in and you'll move your boost threshold up another 200-400rpm.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/208481-2871-on-rb25det/#findComment-5039091
Share on other sites

really quite pointless putting a 0.64 AR rear housing on, will eventually just choke the whole lot.

you have an RB, i'd really not be worried too much about the 64 rear.

I'll be buying a 2871R with a 52 trim front and a 0.86 rear for my SR20. the lag difference is really nominal between them, and if you're really worried about lag, just slap some bigger cams in and you'll move your boost threshold up another 200-400rpm.

The issue with a 2871r is more the turbine size being too small to power the 71mm compressor more so than the housing size. Consensus amongst sr20 people is that the .64 is the housing to use - the .86 doesnt deliver on an sr20. The HKS gt-rs uses a .64 housing on their sr20 kit so this is an indication of what works best.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/208481-2871-on-rb25det/#findComment-5039194
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...