Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

You folks are too bias. The Z06 was faster.

The Z06 did 0-100 in 8.5 seconds and the GTR did it in 8.9.

The GTR did better 0-100-0, but they had a better reaction time in the GTR (time between WOT and hitting brake pedal).

GT-R: 0-100 = 8.9, 100-0 = 4.3, accel to brake reaction time = 0.6

Z06: 0-100 = 8.5, 100-0 = 4.5, accel to brake reaction time = 1.0

Thus, if you subtract the difference in reaction times, the Z06 was not only faster 0-100, but it's faster 0-100-0 also!

The Z06's lead would've been even larger had they kept going (the article mentioned that the Z06 was accelerating harder past 100mph....this also hurt its braking time).

The Z06 is even more impressive because it has inferior tires and hit the market a full THREE years before the GTR.

0-100-0 implies that you'll start timing from the moment the car accelerates up to 100mph and finish timing once it reaches a complete stop. Thats not very complicated, is it? Last time I checked 13.9 < 14.0 :thumbsup:

Seriously though, can't you just appreciate that they are both great cars and are fast enough?

  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

0-100-0 implies that you'll start timing from the moment the car accelerates up to 100mph and finish timing once it reaches a complete stop.
Comments like these usually mean the GTR accelerated faster:
yep gtr outsprints the Z06!
Did I hear him say that it outran the Z06 ??

I didn't know a sprint and "outrunning" included stopping....

Regardless, their reaction time in the Z06 explains why the GTR was a tenth quicker 0-100-0. The reaction time was 0.4 slower in the Z06, thus given an equal reaction time the Z06's time would've been 0.3 better. Getting the same same reaction time is unlikely - kinda like getting the same reaction time in the 1/4-mile on back-to-back runs. The human factor just happened to favor the GTR. You can claim that as a victory, but it is definitely a hollow one.

Additionally, they said the Z06 was accelerating past 100mph faster (more momentum). Also, the driver had just had to change to 3rd to get to 100 which meant it was more difficult to judge when to brake.

Edited by edwardhaskell
Comments like these usually mean the GTR accelerated faster:

I didn't know a sprint and "outrunning" included stopping....

Regardless, their reaction time in the Z06 explains why the GTR was a tenth quicker 0-100-0. The reaction time was 0.4 slower in the Z06, thus given an equal reaction time the Z06's time would've been 0.3 better. Getting the same same reaction time is unlikely - kinda like getting the same reaction time in the 1/4-mile on back-to-back runs. The human factor just happened to favor the GTR. You can claim that as a victory, but it is definitely a hollow one.

Additionally, they said the Z06 was accelerating past 100mph faster (more momentum). Also, the driver had just had to change to 3rd to get to 100 which meant it was more difficult to judge when to brake.

You know what, they're just cars. If you can't figure out that many people on this forum are CAR enthusiasts and can appreciate many types of performance cars (including the Z06) then you need to read threads other than this one.

yes it annihilated the opposition, it took them 3 cars and still couldn't touch the GTR.

drag race was a little dodgy though, I think I'd like to see an acutal 1/4 mile with the computer shot in the head.

You folks are too bias. The Z06 was faster.

The Z06 did 0-100 in 8.5 seconds and the GTR did it in 8.9.

The GTR did better 0-100-0, but they had a better reaction time in the GTR (time between WOT and hitting brake pedal).

GT-R: 0-100 = 8.9, 100-0 = 4.3, accel to brake reaction time = 0.6

Z06: 0-100 = 8.5, 100-0 = 4.5, accel to brake reaction time = 1.0

Thus, if you subtract the difference in reaction times, the Z06 was not only faster 0-100, but it's faster 0-100-0 also!

The Z06's lead would've been even larger had they kept going (the article mentioned that the Z06 was accelerating harder past 100mph....this also hurt its braking time).

The Z06 is even more impressive because it has inferior tires and hit the market a full THREE years before the GTR.

You guys know good old Ed here is from the corvette forum, just coming over here to justify why they lost with some lame number crunching BS. Hey Ed, go back to your pushrod V8 farm plow loving. Yeeehaw

The ZR1 corvette will probably top the R35

Agreed. The V spec will be more of a competition for the ZR-1.

The Z06 is an aweosme piece of machinery which did hit the mark a few years before the R35 did. In saying that the GTR is slightly slower at the high end of the scale but at those speeds who really cares :D

Edited by Zoggy
You guys know good old Ed here is from the corvette forum, just coming over here to justify why they lost with some lame number crunching BS. Hey Ed, go back to your pushrod V8 farm plow loving. Yeeehaw

hahhahahaaha

i lol'd :)

last time i checked, the Z06 and the GTR both had steering wheels....

i'm pretty sure cars are meant to turn aren't they? although judging from some of these linked threads and comments in here, i'm not sure everyone understands that.. i must admit, it's hard to get your head around...

>_<

You folks are too bias. The Z06 was faster.

The Z06 did 0-100 in 8.5 seconds and the GTR did it in 8.9.

The GTR did better 0-100-0, but they had a better reaction time in the GTR (time between WOT and hitting brake pedal).

GT-R: 0-100 = 8.9, 100-0 = 4.3, accel to brake reaction time = 0.6

Z06: 0-100 = 8.5, 100-0 = 4.5, accel to brake reaction time = 1.0

Thus, if you subtract the difference in reaction times, the Z06 was not only faster 0-100, but it's faster 0-100-0 also!

The Z06's lead would've been even larger had they kept going (the article mentioned that the Z06 was accelerating harder past 100mph....this also hurt its braking time).

The Z06 is even more impressive because it has inferior tires and hit the market a full THREE years before the GTR.

The Z06 is a faster top end car. Power to weight ...easy math. There are fair whack of other cars faster than the Z06 and GTR again in this area.

However getting the pig off the line or round a corner fast without really having to get it perfect makes the car nice too don't you think?

Nice to buy a car with good traction and handling out of the box, we all like that. The factory don't hand the Z06 to you like that at present (as good as it could be). They do give you the GTR that way. Always sucks when the factory skimp on tyres etc. but, then thats what stock means.

There have been plenty of reviews now on various great cars compared to the new R35 from all over the world. There is now a very basic agreement that it's the best bit of kit you can buy for the price replacing the very worthy Z06 for 'bang for buck'.

Z06 is a great performer but, it's out gunned by the GTR in all but, outright straight line speed. Even then the gap is still very narrow. But, straight line speed isn't worth much in the equation I've owned a few cars that make the GTR and Z06 look like nerd toys for straight line speed. The same cars however would be in the dust behind the Z06 trying to go around a corner or stop.

Admit the GTR is great and if your not going to buy a Z06 a pretty good second option or visa versa.

last time i checked, the Z06 and the GTR both had steering wheels....

i'm pretty sure cars are meant to turn aren't they? although judging from some of these linked threads and comments in here, i'm not sure everyone understands that.. i must admit, it's hard to get your head around...

:rofl:

The point of the evo article was to race the best accelerating car (Corvette) in a straight line, the best road car (the Audi R8) on the road and the most track based weapon (the GT3) on the track to see how the GTR stacks up against the best of everything. It did a damn good job.

When I say the "best" I mean Evo's version of the best when you exclude straight out super cars.

I was actually most surprised to hear that it was faster than the Audi on bumpy Welsh roads and that the driver of the GTR needed to feather the throttle on the straight to allow the Audi to keep up, so that he could see how hard the driver was pushing to keep up.

It will be interesting to see how fast the v-spec is. Just imagine if it lost even 200kg's and gained 50 horses.

Nissan have done an outstanding job, as the article says it is the new benchmark.

Cheers

Comments like these usually mean the GTR accelerated faster:

I didn't know a sprint and "outrunning" included stopping....

Regardless, their reaction time in the Z06 explains why the GTR was a tenth quicker 0-100-0. The reaction time was 0.4 slower in the Z06, thus given an equal reaction time the Z06's time would've been 0.3 better. Getting the same same reaction time is unlikely - kinda like getting the same reaction time in the 1/4-mile on back-to-back runs. The human factor just happened to favor the GTR. You can claim that as a victory, but it is definitely a hollow one.

Additionally, they said the Z06 was accelerating past 100mph faster (more momentum). Also, the driver had just had to change to 3rd to get to 100 which meant it was more difficult to judge when to brake.

This is the thing about yank cars, all you seem to care about is how fast you can make it go in a straight line....

Cars have steering for a reason. Its a wounder people dont just replace drag strips with rails and race trains?

This is the thing about yank cars, all you seem to care about is how fast you can make it go in a straight line....

Cars have steering for a reason. Its a wounder people dont just replace drag strips with rails and race trains?

I love how ppl write of the Corvette saying sit doesnt handle. Its Australian built brakes are about the best steel brakes you can get on a production car. They are brilliant and fade free. And the car handles very well. How else can a Z06 be only 4 seconds slower over a lap of a 20km track, all with no traction control or 4wd or other gayness?

The GTR is perhaps the best all round performance car getting around at the moment. Especially for the dollars. But why does that mean ppl cant give credit to cars that do similar things differently? Hell the Vette is as quick as a GT2 Porsche...so how can you be so stoooopid as to say they dont handle :rofl: But consider for a second the asking price of the Z06, cosnider its only rwd and doesnt have a gay automatic gearbox, instead 3 pedals and a real gearbox which i understand is a cavemans way of changing gears these days, and a slower way to hurl the car down the road....and tell me the Z06 isnt a blindingly fast car. Hell getting back to the 20km Ring example, how many gearchanges are there in that lap? There could be the 4 seconds there? So you cant say they dont handle!!!!

At the end of the day they are all quick enough for me...it comes down to styling and sound for me. So this

bluedevil.jpg

Versus this

20071024_gtrworld_051.jpg

And go watch the Top Gear adn 5th Gear vids of the Z06...the thing sounds great and is a hoot to drive.

I had a mate recently go to the US and rent out a z06... Just by going on what he said, it didnt handle to save itself. Prehaps he was wrong, I doubt it as he drove it around for a week, and when hes here he owns a 02ish commodore, but feh.

There yank tanks that will never be availible here. I dont really get why we dont import more, I mean we import enough grey imports from japan right? But you never really see much in the way of yankee cars. Not that I mind, I dont really like them.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Did this end up working? Did you take some pictures?
    • And finally, the front lower mount. It was doubly weird. Firstly, the lower mount is held in with a bracket that has 3 bolts (it also acts as the steering lock stop), and then a nut on the shock lower mount itself. So, remove the 3x 14mm head bolts , then the 17mm nut that holds the shock in. From there, you can't actually remove the shock from the lower mount bolt (took me a while to work that out....) Sadly I don't have a pic of the other side, but the swaybar mounts to the same bolt that holds the shock in. You need to push that swaybar mount/bolt back so the shock can be pulled out past the lower control arm.  In this pic you can see the bolt partly pushed back, but it had to go further than that to release the shock. Once the shock is out, putting the new one in is "reverse of disassembly". Put the top of the shock through at least one hole and put a nut on loosely to hold it in place. Put the lower end in place and push the swaybar mount / shock bolt back in place, then loosely attach the other 2 top nuts. Bolt the bracket back in place with the 14mm head bolts and finally put the nut onto the lower bolt. Done....you have new suspension on your v37!
    • And now to the front.  No pics of the 3 nuts holding the front struts on, they are easy to spot. Undo 2 and leave the closest one on loosely. Underneath we have to deal with the wiring again, but this time its worse because the plug is behind the guard liner. You'll have to decide how much of the guard liner to remove, I undid the lower liner's top, inside and lower clips, but didn't pull it full off the guard. Same issue undoing the plug as at the rear, you need to firmly push the release clip from below while equally firmly gripping the plug body and pulling it out of  the socket. I used my fancy electrical disconnect pliers to get in there There is also one clip for the wiring, unlike at the rear I could not get behind it so just had to lever it up and out.....not in great condition to re-use in future.
    • Onto the rear lower shock mount. It's worth starting with a decent degrease to remove 10+ years of road grime, and perhaps also spray a penetrating oil on the shock lower nut. Don't forget to include the shock wiring and plug in the clean.... Deal with the wiring first; you need to release 2 clips where the wiring goes into the bracket (use long nose pliers behind the bracket to compress the clip so you can reuse it), and the rubber mount slides out, then release the plug.  I found it very hard to unplug, from underneath you can compress the tab with a screwdriver or similar, and gently but firmly pull the plug out of the socket (regular pliers may help but don't put too much pressure on the plastic. The lower mount is straightforward, 17mm nut and you can pull the shock out. As I wasn't putting a standard shock back in, I gave the car side wiring socket a generous gob of dialectric grease to keep crap out in the future. Putting the new shock in is straightforward, feed it into at least 1 of the bolt holes at the top and reach around to put a nut on it to hold it up. Then put on the other 2 top nuts loosely and put the shock onto the lower mounting bolt (you may need to lift the hub a little if the new shock is shorter). Tighten the lower nut and 3 upper nuts and you are done. In my case the BC Racing shocks came assembled for the fronts, but the rears needed to re-use the factory strut tops. For that you need spring compressors to take the pressure off the top nut (they are compressed enough when the spring can move between the top and bottom spring seats. Then a 17mm ring spanner to undo the nut while using an 8mm open spanner to stop the shaft turning (or, if you are really lucky you might get it off with a rattle gun).
    • You will now be able to lift the parcel shelf trim enough to get to the shock cover bolts; if you need to full remove the parcel shelf trim for some reason you also remove the escutcheons around the rear seat release and you will have to unplug the high stop light wiring from the boot. Next up is removal of the bracket; 6 nuts and a bolt Good news, you've finally got to the strut top! Remove the dust cover and the 3 shock mount nuts (perhaps leave 1 on lightly for now....) Same on the other side, but easier now you've done it all before
×
×
  • Create New...