Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Short list of mods:

RB25det spec 2

GT3582R .82ar

Jun style intake

90mm throttle body

550cc Delphi top feed low impedance injectors

JGY fuel rail

Aeromotive FPR

Walbro 255hp fuel pump

Tial 44mm v band waste gate

Hallman boost controller

3" ss turbo back exhaust

Top mount exhaust manifold

Apexi Safc 2

Apexi ITC

93 pump gas

Spec stage 3 clutch

Synchronic BOV

FMIC

Z32 MAF blow threw

This is a 2698lb with driver in it 240sx.

We had some problems with the boost creep so we could only set it at 11 psi but as you can see it creped up to 13.5 or so at about 6100 rpms. Also had some problems with my coil packs.

This is wheel horse power not in shoot out mode.

Correction factors were

77deg. F

60% humidity

60" of mercury

Intake temp was 90deg F

Car pulls like mad all the way to red line. I am very happy with the car as is but I'll more then likely pull the exhaust manifold off and fix the creep problem.

post-42695-1206654714_thumb.jpg

post-42695-1206654793_thumb.jpg

Edited by JonTurpening
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/212349-had-my-car-tuned/
Share on other sites

Was not sure of the amount of boost I can run on a stock rb, so we kept it safe at 13.5. What would you recommend? What can these motors handle??

I am going to be pulling out the motor this fall and building it top to bottom. To take advantage of the set up. SO If I can run a higher boost now let me know!!!

Seems like a bit of a waste until you turn the boost up.
Edited by JonTurpening

Will the stock motor hold up at that amout of boost?

about 20psi depends if you start to get valve float those turbos can run up to 30ish psi. Not sure how well a SAFCII will go just keep an eye on A/F dont get leaner then 12ish to `1 when you are leaning on it.

I had asked my tuner if I needed to get a power fc and he told me with the itc and the safc2 I would not see much of a difference at the level I was running the car. I'll check with him again when I get the coil packs and see what he thinks about running 17-20psi.

I just can't see spending over $1300 U.S for a used Power fc. Then having to spend another $300 to get the tuning software! If need be I'll just get a haltech.

Thanks so much! I am way more familer with US market engines. I.E the VQ35, 4g63, 2jz and the like. I'll have to put the money out on a good set of coils first then it'll be a haltech!

Thanks again guys!

I'm happy with the power it's making now as the car is light. Can't wait to get a Haltech, coils and fix the boost creep!

then get a haltech any standalone will be much better. Yes stock will hold you may need to put a metal head gasket on though. Like I said at that boost some people have valve float issues.
Edited by JonTurpening

whoops its a gt35/40 (for some reason thought it was a gt30/40) so i would only run the car up to about 300rwkw unless you want to put some forgies in then you can crank the boost push the car well into the 300rwkw range

so thats about 402whp. Sounds good!

I've noticed on the dyno thread for the rb25 that alot of guys post up the shoot out mode on the dyno graph. Not sure if is the same as what my tuner is calling shoot out mode or not. Could someone clear up what Shoot out mode on the Dynodynamics there means??

My tuner is telling me it's crank hp. Is this what you guys are calling it??

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Input shaft bearing. They all do it. There is always rollover noise in Nissan boxes - particularly the big box. Don't worry about it unless it gets really growly.
    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
×
×
  • Create New...