Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

As of today, Journalists will be wiriting up the new FG line up..

I got these figures from drive.com.au for the xr6t

0-100km/h: 5.1 seconds

0-400m: 13.4 seconds

Top speed after 400m: 172km/h

From the article:

For the record, the air-conditioning was on. There were no stunts, no tricks, we just squeezed the accelerator. It did it like it was brushing its teeth.

This not only makes the latest Falcon XR6 Turbo the fastest Falcon to date, it also shoots it to the top of the leader board in Australian performance cars. It’s faster than both the Holden V8s and its own big brother, the Falcon XR8 (which stopped the clocks at a comparatively slow 6.3 seconds).

Since the FPV F6 is expected to come with a 310kw figure, expect the 0-100 acceleration time be in 4 seconds and quarter mile in on mid to high 12 seconds

http://www.drive.com.au/Editorial/ArticleD...;vf=12&pg=2

Edited by Barbarian
  • Replies 71
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Is it just me or does every photo of the new Falcon look like it has a really skinny trackwidth?

GT-R times will be much quicker than the Falcon.

I've seen a couple fg xr's on the road and they appear some what smaller than BA/BF's.. also from what I have read, tracks for both front and rear were widened.

Ford Aus promises this car to be the best handling Aussie built car to date.

hell yeah

bring on the fpv f6

it was always said that the BA/BF were the best looking fords ever built - i think they have surpassed that with the FG

very very stylish....

(i dont think there is a common exterior panel between the BF and FG)

i wonder :thumbsup: if it will have shitty ill fitting plastic bits in it and other things that fall off or break :laugh:

parents have a territory AWD ghia and nothings fallen off yet (and its 2 yrs old...)

Not bad. You'd think theyd release photos that aren't in a shit colour...

Car companies always take the most eye-catching colour since it photographs the best.

From Nissan's perspective, look at the horrible Sunset LeMans orange (and the new solar orange) that most of the 350Zs in the promo posters etc are shown in. Really vibrant when printed, and it comes off the background well, but in the metal its really tacky.

The old BA/BF performance Fords had their promo / press cars in that sickly green, too. Great to shoot, bad to look at.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Man, different parts but the same numbers is terrible @dbm7! And it doesn't help that most online shops don't list the part numbers at all. They just give a list of compatible models...
    • Slow when hot could also be because its getting more dynamic compression, OR things are getting a bit tighter once it is all expanded. If it were an earthing issue, typically I'd expect you to have it have issues all the time. Unless it's really a combination of both things. Where the higher compression, and things being a bit tighter, is giving that bit of extra load and you do need a slight clean up on the cables/connections.
    • Yeah, this is one of the most annoying things about nissan part numbers... I've got an unrelated example... Image is of the AT output shaft ~ they have the same part#, but clearly the shaft on the left is beefier design to that on the right ...the difference (essentially) is the 'lighter' shaft on the right, is for engines up to RB25DE (this includes RB20 variants) : the shaft on the left is for RB25/26DET(T)....are they interchangeable? Yes...but obviously one shaft is going to be stronger than the other...and, the lighter shaft is around USD115, but the heavier shaft closer to USD150...same part#... ...epc-data usually tells a tale ~ the amayama listing for 39100-23U60 has a note "Longest side is between 60 and 105 cm" ; no such info is there for 39100-23U70 ...and given the great disparity in price between the 2 parts, it makes me at least curious (to the point of caution) where the 'extra money' went? ...ie; these 2 parts have a cost difference that (to myself at least) isn't explained by 'plastic boot'...ie; with amayama there's AUD700 price difference ...plastic versus rubber?...I'm not seeing it like that...and 60cm ~ 105cm...??...that's a huge disparity....something hinky going on here... I'd try searching by VIN, not model... /2cents
    • I don't know for sure, but I'd expect them all to be interchangeable given the diff end and hub end don't move/change between any C34 series. Often Nissan will change part numbers and the aftermarket follows those year ranges; but the original part number change doesn't mean other parts won't fit. The change could be a change in material, internal parts or even just supplier. For example, all the RB gearbox to engine bolts are no longer available and there is a new part number instead. The only change is they went from cadmium plated bolts to zinc plated due to the issues manufacturing with Cadmium. They look different but work the same.
    • One year is a bit concerning. Did you try contacting GSP? It says 5 year warranty on the box if I remember correctly. I'm also running their driveshafts on my S2 Stagea.   You could check the part numbers on Amayama for your year. Here's the link for my 1998 which gives the 39100-23U60 part number. Well, that and 39100-23U70. https://www.amayama.com/en/genuine-catalogs/epc/nissan-japan/stagea/wgnc34/6649-rb25det/trans/391 What does it say for yours?
×
×
  • Create New...