Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

Going to be putting a front mount in the stagea some time this week :thumbsup: Just wondering if the boost pressure will change at all after installing a frount mount? As I dont have a gauge or anything to check with. Im running stock boost but will be getting a electronic boost controller in the next few weeks :( thinking of a Greddy Profec B spec 2. By the way car is stock, so will be going from the side mounted cooler to a frount mount.

thanks in advance,

chris

i was running 7ish psi with just a 3" cat back and pod.

once i put a 3" stainless steel dump/frontpipe and 3" hi flow cat, boost went to around 8.5psi

then front mount shifted boost to around 9.5psi (maybe a wee bit more )

I would suspect no change on a stock level car.

The factory cooler really isnt "that" bad of a restriction in the factory setting.

Obviously more boost, larger turbo etc then there are benefits there :thumbsup:

Best way to check is to do a before and after dyno.

I never did on my R33, but after a full 3" split dump, decat and HKS catback, and R34 side mount, the dyno boost reading was showing 11.2psi on stock solenoid. No bleed valves or anything.

Will be doing FMIC when i get back from the states so would be interesting to see if i get an increase too.

Suck it up, dyno before and after and let us all know :thumbsup:

Guys, please forgive my ignorance, but i don't get why boost increases. Logically speaking, if you increase the volume (by using a larger intercooler), shouldn't pressure go down? Please enlighten me :thumbsup:

front mount tends to have better flow capacity (as in flow rate) than stock one so you get less pressure drop across the core.

that's why you see more boost at the plenum.

increase in volume may give more lag, depends on flow capacity.

i agree as above..

and lag can also be created by the length of intercooler piping..

wrx seem to get more lag wen fitting a large fmic...

skylines dont get this problem..and if u think u are getting lag, its becoz u need more boost!! :banana:

Ok, i think i understand now :). So the volume increase, in a closed system, would lower the pressure - but the increased rate of flow actually compensates for that increased volume to the point where across the system, the total pressure of air going to the engine increases...

So, how is the flow rate measured, i assume cfm or something. Anyone know what the standard intercooler (on an R33) flow rate is?

Mmm not sure that's how I would put it.

I'd like to think the flow rate increases with larger cross sectional area in intercooler pipes and/or core - whichever is the smallest and lag increases with the total volume of the entire intake system, post turbo.

this is probably overly simplified and the construction of the pipe/bends and core would have substantial influence over it.

of course there would be frictional pressure drop along the length of I/C pipes and the cooler itself.

so, I'd would say a system with a cooler with shorter length across end tanks and shortest possible piping would be best for flow for a given cooler core area and I/C pipe diameter.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Bummer...yeah i "need" something to "ease" up the work and for my driving it would be enough.    Iam counting the tune "without" turbo. I do not mean "cheap" like something from Temu around 200 USD, "Cheap" is something around 1000 USD? 
    • Starter motors used to use the weight of metal (magnets) to provide torque. Now they use (more) current instead. This. It's completely normal.
    • So thing that had me stumped, but I think is OK....is that when it was up in the air, in neutral I had it running to bleed to coolant while I put the wheels back on. I noticed the rears were turning (slowly) which I'd never seen before 20250928_163512.mp4     Because there had been an issue with clutch slip due to pedal adjustment on the dyno, I assumed there was still and issue so spent some quality time upside down under the dash adjusting the pedal....but no matter what I did the wheels still turned in neutral. Even disconnected the master cylinder to pedal rod and same. In despair, I even removed the clutch slave so there was no chance of any preload causing it.....still happened. So either: 1. Something is not right in the bellhousing, or 2. Its a thing sometimes with cold, thick gearbox oil Internet says it might be 2, I hope so!
    • OK, few more things sorted and it is ready for a shakedown on 10-Oct, with one weird thing. Changed the run in oil and filter for the good stuff. 8l came out, about 8.5 went in with filter so that looks all good. Changed the starter (again), this time for a brand new one, works good. Interesting that the Taaaarks one is shorter than factory but spins harder, I guess electronics have moved on a little in the last 30 years. Will be nice to have a bit of extra space under there. Put the timing cover back on, and noted where the cam gears were set as a record.  Will need to double check the timing but it is pretty close. Also put the coil pack cover and intake snorkel back on. Exhaust Inlet Changed the water out for coolant, bled up nicely. Removed the rear brake pads (well worn factory sumitomo ones!), gave the hardware a good clean and reassembled. I've put bendix XP on the back again because the price is excellent at $150 a set and they worked well on the V37. Front pads have plenty so no issue there
×
×
  • Create New...