Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Item:RB25 Gearbox's, one has a full conversion kit one is a box on its own

Age:no idea

Condition:not sure on the condition, they were fine before the cars crashed

Price:$1200 for the box on its own, and $1800 for the whole manual conversion kit (has a good clutch on it)

To Fit:r33 gtst or whatever you like (What car)

Location:Newcastle

Contact:me by PM

Comments:

I am wrecking a whole black r33 gtst, has a decent sized turbo on it and injectors and some 17" SSR wheels (look like jap wheels) $600 for the wheels with legal tyres

Haltech e11v2 computer, comes complete with plug and play harness for R33 GTST and map sensor and air temp sensor, am looking for $1700 for the computer ONO.

I am not pulling the car appart to list parts individually, but you are more then welcome to request parts in this thread. no front end parts are available as it was hit very very hard. pics comming soon.

Can sell the turbo and dump and oil / water lines & injectors & computer & fuel pump all together if someone wants a power upgrade which made 300rwkw on 14psi

Edited by Guilt-Toy
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/217108-rb25det-5-speed-gearbox-x-2/
Share on other sites

the turbo looks like its a VG30 rear with a .70 comp cover and massive wheel in the front.

injectors are red, might be nismo 740's

Do you know what the turbo and injectors are?

added pics of the wheels and other bits

Blitz BOV $200

leaving the wheels at good same price, even though they are good quality jap wheels they could do with a paint job, some gutter scraping on it but it only chipped the paint.

post-1240-1209598796_thumb.jpg

post-1240-1209598831_thumb.jpg

post-1240-1209598868_thumb.jpg

post-1240-1209598889_thumb.jpg

post-1240-1209599012_thumb.jpg

Edited by Guilt-Toy

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...