Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 895
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Anyone able to tell me how the ecu controls boost btw? Currently have a manual boost controller myself.

an aux output of the Vi-PEC controls a soliniod...by varying the on/off ratio of the solinoid it can adjust the boost pressure between the maximum and minimum set...just like any EBC.

It requires a 3 port Mac valve soliniod...it uses the std wiring to activate it if using a Nissan style plug in Vi-PEC ecu.

Edited by DiRTgarage
ive got an r32 gtr n1s, boost control and a vipec ecu, thinking about getting my tuner to turn on launch control, not shore what to expect and also where to set it. ie rpm v boost. has anyone set this up on the vipec v66

i have mine set @ 5000 rpm

so...

v44...i am looking at one of these as a way to get my car un rich...pretty basic mods...

questions...what is the V66 compared to the v44? doesn't seem to say on the website...so im confused...plus seem to not find it in the thread :(

gus

plus...this is full replacement yes?

so...

v44...i am looking at one of these as a way to get my car un rich...pretty basic mods...

questions...what is the V66 compared to the v44? doesn't seem to say on the website...so im confused...plus seem to not find it in the thread :O

gus

plus...this is full replacement yes?

Gus, the V66 was a nick-name that floating around here for the Skyline plug-in board. It is basically a V44 with 6 injector drivers. It is a plug-in board. If you go to their website and look at the Skyline plug-in board there are all the specs there.

Gus, the V66 was a nick-name that floating around here for the Skyline plug-in board. It is basically a V44 with 6 injector drivers. It is a plug-in board. If you go to their website and look at the Skyline plug-in board there are all the specs there.

correct

why bother getting a power fc then have the extra expense of buying a boost controller as well ??

Vi-pec has the boost control already built into it as well as launch control and now antilag

power f/c old technology

Vi-pec new technology

also if you want to get rid of air flow meters with power fc you have the extra expense of getting d-jetro

all those extra's would make the power f/c more expensive over all

agree...you wouldn't buy a PC for your home that was designed and built in the 90's...so why would you consider a computer for your car that was.

Edited by DiRTgarage
Keep an eye out for power fc's you can still get them reasonably cheap if your patient. got mine today for $950 with hand controller only 1 week old

why bother getting a power fc then have the extra expense of buying a boost controller as well ??

Vi-pec has the boost control already built into it as well as launch control and now antilag

power f/c old technology

Vi-pec new technology

also if you want to get rid of air flow meters with power fc you have the extra expense of getting d-jetro

all those extra's would make the power f/c more expensive over all

This _is_ just a re-branded LINK, right? so is it the G4 or G4 Storm or ?

second question: everyone in this topic appears to be from everywhere but NSW

so who in Sydney is ready to put tunes on this (or the Link G4 storm).

Again...this is NOT a rebadged Link...contact Scott at Insight in sydney for supply fitting and tuning.

Again...this is NOT a rebadged Link...contact Scott at Insight in sydney for supply fitting and tuning.

thanks,

Sorry to continue to be skeptical, but it has the same length and height (to the mm)

same processor (same megahertz) same inputs both analog and digital. Same "max rpm",

same feature set, although the website is presented differently so it isn't easy to compare.

http://www.linkecu.com/products/engine-man...g4xtremespecjpg

The same connector on the case..

You don't just accidentally develop in parallel the same ecu. It is immensely expensive

in R&D and software.

Whats the real story here? someone bought the australian marketing rights but wants it

to seem like a locally developed product for added zing?

r34nur has got a point....I mean if it looks like a Link, smells like a Link, then it must be.......

v44.png

storm1.jpg

No amount of camera angles are gonna convince many people otherwise :blink:

Well, I called an NZ Link tuner today, and they confirmed that, yes, vi-pec is

a link (of course). They didn't want to comment on why vi-pec was masquerading

as something new. I smell a story for anyone who cares to dig :)

so basically if you have a link G4 you have a vipec, and vice versa.

I don't really get the secrecy. It turns me off the product: if they are

want to pretend it is their own unit it doesn't give me a great feeling. So I'll

see who can tune Link G4 Xtreme in NSW, it looks like a great product!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I don't think the shuffle can damage the turbos. It only happens at low shaft speeds and loads. It's just annoying (to some people - others are tickled by the effect) and it quite possibly reduces spool performance a little bit.
    • Oh dear. The panel beating needs to be done before the filler work. Do you have a photo of the dent before you started? Hard enough to not flex and only hit the high spots?  What do you mean it was just temporary? 
    • Can u check this way it works for power supply?
    • These coils draw 10amps that what i read online
    • I appreciate the detailed explanation, think I understand now. I spent the better part of last night reading what I could about shuffle and potential solutions. I had replaced the OEM twin turbo pipe with an alternate Y pipe that is separated further away from the turbo. The current one is from HKS and I had a previous pipe that was separated even further away, both have shuffle. I had heard that a divider can be welded in to the OEM pipe to remove turbulence, and figure that aftermarket pipes that are more separated would achieve the same thing. From what I read, most people with -10 turbos get shuffle due to their size, though it's a bit less common with -5s on a standard RB26. I think Nismoid mentioned somewhere it's because OEM recirculation piping is common in Australia with -5 cars. It seems that the recommendation tends to vary between a few options, which I've ordered in what I think is most feasible for me:  1. Retune the MAP or boost controller to try to eliminate shuffle 2. Install OEM recirculation piping 3. Something called a 'balance pipe' welded onto the exhaust manifolds. I don't know if kits for this are available, seems like pure fabrication work 4. simply go single turbo My current layout is as follows: Garrett 2860 -5s HKS Racing Suction intake MAF delete pipes HKS racing chamber intake piping hard intercooler piping,  ARC intercooler HKS SSQV BOV and pipe Haltech 2500 elite ECU and boost solenoid/controller HPI dump pipes OEM exhaust manifolds HKS VCAM step 1 and supporting head modifications Built 2.6 bottom end All OEM recirculation piping was removed, relevant areas sealed off I'll keep an eye out for any alternative solutions but can get started with this.  Only other question is, does shuffle harm the turbo (or anything else)? It seems like some people say your turbo shafts will explode because of the opposing forces after a while and others say they just live with it and adjust their pedal foot accordingly. 
×
×
  • Create New...