Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have a client that I'm looking to setup 5-6 Cisco 1841 Routers for and I'd like to have the fitted WIC's failover but it's not something I have experience with. I was hoping someone here might be good with Cisco IOS as I'm only self taught.

What I'm looking to do is install an 1841 with two WIC's, 1 ADSL and one SHDSL and if interface 1 go's down it will fail over to interface 2. I have experience with setting up the interfaces to work independently but there is some tricky routing involved with failing over and I'm a bit out of my depth.

Has anyone done this that can help? I'm happy to pay. Cheers :down:

PS - If you don't understand what I've just said don't fill my thread with garbage :wave:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/218439-cisco-help-required-1841-programing/
Share on other sites

I understand what your trying to arrange. Its been a few years since i studied the CCNA so I would only be looking through a manual myself.

Now youve got me thinking constantly about how to do this >.<

Yeah it's a bit of a tricky one for me too. It's just a job I'm outsourcing not a full time position but it would be good to have a relationship with someone with a strong Cisco knowledge that we could call on for work as we sometimes have drama’s with VPN and Crypto too. If you think you can do this sort of stuff we can talk $ :wave:

hsrp attached to the wan interface will do it

both routers run hsrp between each other and send echo packets

they also share a virtual ip between them

if one of them doesn't respond to the echo within set timeout the other router takes over the virtual ip

there's always a master and a slave in the hsrp

ive got a book / pdf if you want to do it yourself, its easy

ah i didnt see it was on one device, well yeah just set to two gateways with different metric

the lower metric being the primary route, and the secondary with the higher metric

i assumed you had two routers

yeah if you have two routers, then HSRP is spot on

will give you want you need, just make sure you set it to watch the serial or dialer/0 interface for the dsl connection

and test it of course, also make sure to set the priority, dont assume defaults

for those interested in similar topics check out;

network warrior

http://www.amazon.com/Network-Warrior-Gary...7458&sr=8-1

a recommended read

it covers advanced and commonly used scenarios of networking and networking concepts

the pdf version is on bit torrent if you want a sneek peek, but the paper back is recommended

http://www.mininova.org/tor/860447

i purchased mine from amazon.com delivered in about 1.5 weeks for $49 new

adz,

get cisco's packet tracer.

setup your routers in it, test it all out..configurations/layouts/etc and use the book resources to help you if needed!

router simulation easiest way to go about it

let me know if you want a copy

what if the interface stays up but theres no ip connectivity, twill never swap over :thumbsup:

best way is to setup object tracking/EEM applet on the cisco so it automaticaly pings the default gateway every few seconds then if it fails it swaps over by itsself.

justin911 makes a good point - and the main point why traditional interface down detection methods won't work with ADSL.

The ADSL line sync (layer2 of the OSI model) will be the main interface that the detection will work on. What you'll find is that most of the time, the PPP layer (layer 3 of the OSI model) will be the one failing, and you'll lose your PPP link - which means no traffic. This PPP fail won't trigger the interface as being down.

The default gateway idea is the most logical however not always reliable. I suspect that depending on the routing protocol it might not always detect the ADSL/SHDSL fail and keep pumping out packets to the default gateway with the lowest metric which will result in lost packets and no connectivity.

Not having any live cisco equipment I can't say for sure (and I don't work on the equipment on a daily basis anymore) but being a good cisco tech I did some googling and found the following:

http://wiki.ittoolbox.com/index.php/Cisco_Failover

This is an IOS feature (sla monitor/rtr?) that tests a particular IP address for certain criteria, ie:

IP sla monitor 1

type echo protocol ipIcmpEcho your_first_test_ip source-ipaddr your_source_ip

timeout 2000

threshold 2000

frequency 3

IP sla monitor schedule 1 life forever start-time now

Basically the above will ping a particular IP through a particular interface and make sure it meets the SLA of 'a timeout of no longer than 2000ms' and 'no more than 3 failures in a row' or something to that effect.

Look at the website above and the rest of the commands will set up the routes etc. Its a start but I don't know how useful it is - and you're right, it's probably out of your depth - heck its even out of mine and I'm a CCNA/CCDA/VOIP etc.

Like i said mate i'm not working on the stuff full time anymore but I can still get my head around most of the stuff. You'll be able to find my ph number. Gimmie a call anytime - don't feel afraid to chuck me a config file either :)

More info for you here Adz:

http://www.velocityreviews.com/forums/t552...cisco-2801.html

And as Justin mentioned above, object tracking sounds like what I found above, however i havn't worked on it before:

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_3/1...e/dbackupx.html

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I'm thinking that this is such a small part of the problem that you could easily forego the vac pump and just achieve 90% of what you need, which is keeping the gate open when off boost. It's not as if there are not already techniques to keep a gate fully closed under boost. After all, you have boost. Just use a wastegate actuator that will allow you to apply the boost on the appropriate side, just like every external gate out there.
    • Heres another fitment photo. redrilled the pattern to 5x112, and threw my audi´s rims on. had to touch the upper control arms with grinder, because the "sharp corner" was sticking about 2-3mm on the tire path. i have the "fender lip" mostly cut off, otherwise these (too) would contact with it. 20x9.5 ET25 rear    265/30 20x8.5 ET20 front    255/30 they are temporary, and look too big for the chassis. searching for 19s to it.
    • From experience, it will come back to bite you haha.
    • Background: my BMW 225i hatchback (rebodied MINI/X1) came with 3x RE003 and 1x Goodyear Asymmetric something. The RE003 roared and slid around, the Goodyear side was quiet and grippy. Definitely my car was thrashed before it got sent to dealers. My brother also got RE003 all round on his old VA WRX STI, I wasn't impressed with them, car was loud so can't comment on noise. Anyway, Hankook stopped making/updating V12 Evo2. So bought S1 Evo3 runflats. Great daily duties tyre and not that harsh ride. Tyre reviews site/youtube rated them as best stopping in the rain and I believe them. Next set, Goodyear Asymmetric 5 non-RFT. It beat PS4 in tests and is like $100 cheaper, so put them on. Great tyre, more grip then S1 Evo3 but a tad noisier as expected, still rocking them. Next set I am looking to go runflats, probably the new Hankook Evo. Although the new Pirelli PZ5 did well in tyrereviews test. Or go Goodyear Asymmetric 6 which was top tyre last year. The V12 Evo2 on my gen5 Liberty GT wagon did great in cold condition (drove to snowy mountains for a day so my husky can feel his ancestor's roots). Super impressive performance for $120 each lol. Never skimp on tyres, brakes, suspension. There's old pics of my R31's crappy random brake pads bending in the caliper at Oran Park track day somewhere around here. Anyway, my 2 cents.
×
×
  • Create New...