Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Im using top feed injectors in a rb25det (side rail) inlet plenum.

Ive had a few problems making power and im chasing up any potential issues.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Rb...l=missing+100kw

One that has come up is the injectors dont sit deep enough into the flow causing inefective atomisation.

Has anyone else come accross this?

Please post pic of yr setup.

cheers rob.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/220085-injector-setup/
Share on other sites

or get a top feed rail to suit the injectors?

Im curious how you fitted top feed injectors into a side feed rail? You must have modified the crap out of the rail?!?!

he didnt, pic from his other thread - top feed rail.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...t&id=144591

i dont think that the injectors being set back into the open in each runner would cost you 100kw from low atomisation.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/220085-injector-setup/#findComment-3884170
Share on other sites

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...t&id=144591

i dont think that the injectors being set back into the open in each runner would cost you 100kw from low atomisation.

Chasing up any and all possiblites at this stage...

If injectors spraying onto the walls and dribbling into the cyclinders then I would assume that would make a huge differance to combustion???

why dont you sell the top feed, then buy some side feed injectors that are suited to your rail. Problem solved?

Looking into it... but will have to find injectors and plugs, and new fuel rail then modify to suit my fuel system etc

will be easier and cheaper to mount mine a little better. just after a few ideas on how other people have done it...

cheers rob

Edited by roba
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/220085-injector-setup/#findComment-3884631
Share on other sites

Roba - you know how far in teh injectors sit into the runners?

i did see a post with pics regarding the injectors and how far recessed they are from the air path.

your looking at up to 60psi of rail pressure, unless you injectors arent pointing directly into the air stream i dont see how it would dripple down to the inlet valves.

have you checked that the injectors are perpendicular to the injector hole face?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/220085-injector-setup/#findComment-3884844
Share on other sites

Im running rx7 550cc top feeds in a side feed manifold. You need to get an 18.5mm (what i had on hand) drill bit and drill out the holes for the injectors.

From memory i nearly drilled right through, it does not matter if you do tho. Then you can push the injector further into the manifold. the stock o-rings will not fall in as they are like 30mm. With the manifold off you can see the pintle of the injector is just sticking out a mm or 2 into the flow.

I did this after i saw a mate with same setup as yours, under boost the o-rings were moving up the bottom of the injectors and i thought there was potential for fuel and boost to leak

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/220085-injector-setup/#findComment-3898904
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Im using the rb25de intake and have top feed gtst rail (r32) and top feed injectors but they dont want to fit into the rail as the o ring seems to fat. Can i replace the o rings or does it just take a lot of work to squeeze them in there? The 25de ones pull straight out relatively easily though...... any advice??????

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/220085-injector-setup/#findComment-4008962
Share on other sites

put the 25de o-rings on the new injectors. Or buy some new o-rings from nissan, i have rx7 550cc and with rb20 o-rings on them they are still really tight in the rb20 rail. I lubed them up a little with a little bit of new engine oil and made sure i didnt pinch the o-rings when i out them into the rail.

Once they are in, you can pressurise the rail to 60psi and they wont fall out!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/220085-injector-setup/#findComment-4009998
Share on other sites

Um no good, tried swapping the injector o rings but they still wont fit at the rail or the plenum.

May have to sell and buy something else. Any suggestions or offers for replacement injectors?

The current ones are 670cc's so nothin smaller than 650 i suppose. Have to be top feed.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/220085-injector-setup/#findComment-4013489
Share on other sites

yeah they must be they are only a fraction too big. Could i get the fuel rail and runners machined to fit them or is it better to just get different injectors. Had a look on trademe and the other sard injectors to suit gtrs have 14mm o rings top and bottom.....

Anyone who has top mount injectors to fit 20det/25de intake setup around the 6/700cc mark for sale please message me.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/220085-injector-setup/#findComment-4017842
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...