Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I heard the the straight 6 is smoother running, and produces more low torque in the rev range than V6's...

I don't really know :S

What's better a V6 or a straight 6 and why?

Ok this may not be the most educated answer ever..but i would believe it depends on the actual motor...like i'm sure an RB26 would run differently to like an commonwhore motor

inline 6 and flat 6 engines are intrinsically balanced, so they run very smoothly. every other type of engine (until you get to 12 cylinders) is not balanced. balance shafts are installed next to the crank which offset this vibration but you can never do the job perfectly.

The torque curve has more to do with the other design aspects of the motor. You can design an inline-6 to have massive low-end torque (most serious diesel engines are inline-6).

after owning a RB25DET, and a 6A13TT, i'd say the straight 6 makes a better note, but the V6 is better in every other way.

the V6 has plenty of torque all through the range

That's not really a fair comparison, the Galant engine is a twin turbo which gives you more flexibility in how you develop boost (and by relation, torque). Also, Galants are rally cars.. where midrange torque is your bread and butter. Skylines are circuit cars, and it's all about top end on a circuit.

V6's have a much shorter crank, which should add to strength i think, but obviously theres alot of other factors which contribute to that too

V6's are also more compact, so they can fit into smaller cars, and theres some reason that they are better for emissions apparently.

Edited by VB-

generally inline 6s are cantered over to one side to allow better clearance and lower COG.

just FYI

Straight six is "simpler" too in that you don't need two sets of heads, etc (let's disregard VW's 15deg V6 for the timebeing as it's a cheater broken straight six anyway... lol)

They're different configurations so you're wasting your time seeing which is 'better'. They've both been around for many decades so obviously they both work effectively.

I like the I6 better for its smoothness, but i wouldn't knock a V6 based on that reason. Being behind an RB or a VQ engine, they both sound and rev great and both are torquey.

The torque curve has more to do with the other design aspects of the motor. You can design an inline-6 to have massive low-end torque (most serious diesel engines are inline-6).

Skylines are circuit cars, and it's all about top end on a circuit.

You can design an engine to do anything you want. The parameters between all engine components functions, cylinder head capability, use of forced induction, displacement, gear ratios, fuel maps etc. are so wide that a 4 cylinder can be built to outdo an I6. It depends on the engineering requirements.

And no, Skylines are road cars.

Depending on the circuit of course, midrange and torque are usually more important than top end. Torque pulls you through corners, and is what allows easier overtaking. What's 10,000RPM going to achieve over usable torque? Nothing, because top end RPM's are a measure of the engine's speed, not the maximum power available to pull you through a hairpin.

V6's have a much shorter crank, which should add to strength i think, but obviously theres alot of other factors which contribute to that too

How many RB cranks break?

generally inline 6s are cantered over to one side to allow better clearance and lower COG.

just FYI

Straight six is "simpler" too in that you don't need two sets of heads, etc (let's disregard VW's 15deg V6 for the timebeing as it's a cheater broken straight six anyway... lol)

Spot on. The COG is even better on a flat-6.

Yes, a V6 is more complex (in the number of parts anyway).

A v6 can produce more power then a strait 6 when modefied but the the strait 6 can hold power better then the v6 Example: Strait6 500hp V6 500hp the v6 would crack faster then the strait 6 would under havy driving.

They can both produce big power. No, they won't just crack because of their piston configuration. Detonation or an oil failure would be more likely to kill the engine rather than its shape. A conrod might crack from excessive heat/force, but that can happen on any overpowered engine.

But in saying that I6's are used more commonly for large industrial machinery. It's better balance, hence reduced vibration, makes it more suited to large power (esp. torque) applications. Think of trucks used for mining, carring thousands of tonnes of cargo. A V6's inherent configuration would be unsuitable in this regard.

To illustrate, think of a TOLL truck's 80L or 90L I6 engine used to ship packages interstate. The vibrations we feel in 2.6L engines are amplified greatly in a 90L engine. It's 34.5 times greater displacement, so imagine 34.5 times more vibration coming from your engine bay.

Then imagine you have a V6 in the same situation :P

Edited by R338OY

i don't really know which is better but here's some pics:

vg30dett in Z32:

CowraKarl.jpg

RB26 in Z32:

RB26Z.JPG

rb engine is longer, the radiator was moved further forward so there's going to be more weight further forward, not sure about the weight difference between vg30 and rb26 either. but much more room to work :D

A v6 can produce more power then a strait 6 when modefied but the the strait 6 can hold power better then the v6 Example: Strait6 500hp V6 500hp the v6 would crack faster then the strait 6 would under havy driving.

Great. Thanks for that gem of knowledge.

And no, Skylines are road cars.

The "GT" designation stands for "Gran Turismo" or "Grand Touring". Skylines were built as enduro racers, not dropping down to the shops to get some milk. A Hyundai Excel is a road car.

What's 10,000RPM going to achieve over usable torque?

What's usable torque going to achieve if you have to change up a gear at 3,000RPM? When was the last time you were out-dragged by a bus? Why do you think F1 cars rev to the sky rather than rely on bottom end torque?

It's all down to gearing. It's better to make torque at high RPM because you can be in a lower gear, and the effective torque at the wheels is better.

To illustrate, think of a TOLL truck's 80L or 90L I6 engine used to ship packages interstate. The vibrations we feel in 2.6L engines are amplified greatly in a 90L engine. It's 34.5 times greater displacement, so imagine 34.5 times more vibration coming from your engine bay.

90L engine? hahahaha.. you're kidding right. I think you mean 9.0L. Most prime movers use turbo diesels around the 9.0L mark (eg Volvo FM-9 prime mover is 9.4L turbo diesel). Don't pull figures out of your arse.

I think I'm done in this thread.

You cant really say which one is "better"

V6 is more compact, but is more complicated (ie complex intake, double the cams)

Straight 6 is simpler but has a longer crank, so more load on the end furthest from the flywheel but is smoother and has some natural balance.

Its not the configuration of the cylinders that makes or breaks an engine it is how it is designed. Bore, stroke, compression ratio, head configuration etc has a far greater affect on an engine than whether its a V or straight.

There are examples of good and bad I6 and V6 engines

And to Kinks,

the reason F1 cars rev to 18k+rpm is that they are limited to a very small capacity. Being as Kw = (Nm x rpm)/9550, for these little (ie. not very torquey) engines to make the power levels that they do, they need to rev like crazy and be designed to make what little torque they can at those high revs.

And you are right, it is all down to gearing, but that same principle applys to low revving cars aswell, just look at the Audi diesle Le Mans race car, it wont even pull 5,000rpm, but thanks to clever gearing the thing is increadibly fast. But this is all off topic.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Brooooo Please send ABS control unit schematic Please! R33 gts25t ABS (Its two plug ecu, black and white) wire colors possible? [email protected]
    • Don't even try to run it on the stock ECU if you're going to have the boost controller bring boost above ~10 psi. I've already told you that. If you use the Nistune ECU, you will need to CAREFULLY read the available documentation for Neo tuning, and read some threads on the Nistune forums, to discover the various things you have to do to prevent the ECU from going bananas when the boost is too high. The is a table associated with th boost sensor that must be modified to prevent it from shitting the bed. This is just one of the things that you will need to do to the tune in Nistune, because the Neo turbo ECU will be expecting to see a number of things (such as the TCS) that are not there, and you have to block the DTCs on those. It is totally not surprising to me that you are having the problems that you are, but the solutions to these problems have been known for >15 years. So just get it done.
    • Hi. Sry iam not a mechanic and iam not at the car atm so i dont know 100% but they told they measure those and even try to change those. AFM they have two. Coils are new a they have my old one too. Plugs too. ECU...we have 25 NEO stock and Nistune 25 NEO.   But i dont know if any one those could be the problem and why/if/what can cause this, Only thing they did not check is fuel...but that walbro 255 is new(like 1,5 years)... That fuel pressure gauge idk...but i let them know Any suggestions?   EDIT: how can they know if it is like you say he ECU pull power when it reaches a specific boost level that is too high? Tha car has boost controler
    • Can you clarify what you mean by boost cut, do you mean it misfires both when under load (driving) and when stationary and out of gear? Or does the ECU pull power when it reaches a specific boost level that is too high (boost control issue)? Does it occur at idle with no throttle? When you say "the ECU is OK", what ECU is it and why do you think it is OK? Have you used the NEO ECU, and if so do you have a MAP sensor attached? Same for the AFM, why do you think it is OK? Do you have any way to put a fuel pressure gauge on it (even just a mechanical one between the fuel filter and fuel rail)?
×
×
  • Create New...