Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

bs are you guys serious? can anyone confirm this?

if this really is true why do ppl bother opening there bonnet

very doubtful

Road Safety Act 1986

13 Power to inspect motor vehicles and trailers

(1) An authorised officer for the purposes of this section or a member of the police force may at any reasonable time inspect a motor vehicle or trailer which is being used on a highway if the officer or member believes on reasonable grounds that—

(a) the driver of the motor vehicle is not complying with this Act or the regulations in driving a motor vehicle of that kind; or

(b) the motor vehicle or trailer does not comply with this Act or the regulations.

(4) An inspection may include any tests which the inspecting officer or member of the police force decides to be appropriate.

(5) A person who refuses or fails—

(a) to allow a motor vehicle or trailer to be inspected when required under this section; or

(b) to produce a motor vehicle or trailer for inspection at the place specified in a notice within 7 days after service of the notice on that person—

is guilty of an offence.

Penalty: 5 penalty units.

  • Replies 70
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Your car does not technically have a chassis, it's a mono-coque shell design. The entire shell works as a chassis, that is why it's considered "modifying the chassis". You've cut a hole in a "crumple zone" thus lessening the integrity of the chassis (shell), Regardless of airbag or no airbag It should not be done.

i fully understand and agree with what you are saying to an extent, however what about when cars are "modified" by an accident, and arent written off, rather just put on a chassis jig and straightened again... the original structual intergrity is not fully restored it has been crushed, weakened and then just pulled straight (well straight if they are a good panel beater)

are these safe, i think a detailed inspection and testing by an appropriatly qualified engineer could determine this, so why can't the same be done for a neat circular hole cut in a sil panel?

i appreciate police cracking down on unsafe vehicles, they are not doing this for fun!

rather i question the vehicles they are cracking down on! i find that a rusty old corona with more rust then metal, bog falling out from prior accidents and ball joints and tie rod ends about to fall apart far more unsafe then a tidy skyline with a neat circular hole cut in a panel that does not apear to be a major structual piece in the front end of the car.

but you wouldnt want to upset the little old grannies driving thier corona now, would you?

and its allready been discussed that the airbag sensor is not at the front of the vehicle, so whats stopping a massive frontal accident setting off an airbag sensor just because a hole has been cut? it doesnt make sense, as for crumple zones, they mearly act as a way to lengthen the time period of the impact so the force can be spread out, in hope of preventing death or serious injury through a massively sudden impact!

wouldnt a circular hole and alluminium pipe crush just as well?

Correct , by law, officers are not allowed to force you or physically touch your car, i.e. open up your bonnet etc or take pictures of it without your consent - but I know how you felt, you were nervous and in the moment. I suggest you speak to Vicroads and do all that you can to get this cleared up asap, as I know getting an import registered nowadays is harder than before.

thats not true.. police are allowed to determine if a vehicle is roadworthy by all reaosnable means - so if that means popping you bonnet etc thats legal - says my criminal law lecturer mirko bargaric who is also mokbels x-lawyer

very doubtful

Road Safety Act 1986

13 Power to inspect motor vehicles and trailers

(1) An authorised officer for the purposes of this section or a member of the police force may at any reasonable time inspect a motor vehicle or trailer which is being used on a highway if the officer or member believes on reasonable grounds that—

(a) the driver of the motor vehicle is not complying with this Act or the regulations in driving a motor vehicle of that kind; or

(b) the motor vehicle or trailer does not comply with this Act or the regulations.

(4) An inspection may include any tests which the inspecting officer or member of the police force decides to be appropriate.

(5) A person who refuses or fails—

(a) to allow a motor vehicle or trailer to be inspected when required under this section; or

(b) to produce a motor vehicle or trailer for inspection at the place specified in a notice within 7 days after service of the notice on that person—

is guilty of an offence.

Penalty: 5 penalty units.

thought so.......

Better to cop the defect for a inoperable bonnet latch in some cases :O

thats not actually a bad idea...........although i wonder how much trouble you would get into by it.

ok guys,we have to come to a conclusion with vicroads and the result is,my cars going into panel beaters on saturday to cover up my hole in the battery tray,which means my coolers comming out and replacing it with stock one...They told me that they would not hassle me more..i actually got a good quote from a panel beater,soo lucky not to loose to much money..no engineers cert required which saved my life..

basically they are going to weld the hole back,sand it down and respray my battery tray..guys this is a bad experience and i dont uz to get done aswell..il be looking into turnflow or gettin custom pipe done..

ok guys,we have to come to a conclusion with vicroads and the result is,my cars going into panel beaters on saturday to cover up my hole in the battery tray,which means my coolers comming out and replacing it with stock one.

i guess its a 2 way street on this one.

good on ya for being able to fix it but wat a pain to get coolers in and out. :P

it wakes up a few of us guys who are running holes under the batt tray for cooler pipes. makes you want a gtr more and more :D

gl with the rest of it buddy :)

and its allready been discussed that the airbag sensor is not at the front of the vehicle, so whats stopping a massive frontal accident setting off an airbag sensor just because a hole has been cut? it doesnt make sense, as for crumple zones, they mearly act as a way to lengthen the time period of the impact so the force can be spread out, in hope of preventing death or serious injury through a massively sudden impact!

wouldnt a circular hole and alluminium pipe crush just as well?

It doesn't matter where the sensor is, in fact it makes more sense that it's as close to the passengers as possible as it's measuring the deceleration of the passenger compartment. By cutting a hole in the crumple zone there will be a change in the way the portion of car behind the crumple zones decelerates, potentially causing the airbag not to trigger in a situation where it otherwise should have... I wouldn't want to sign off on something like that

Note: not saying this doesn't also apply to repaired vehicles...

Speaking of pulsars. Anyone know if you can put an NA engine into a turbo car and drive it on your p's? I have a mate about to get his licence and he loves the GTIR pulsars. Could he put the NA SR into it and drive it like that on his p's or is it still classified as a turbo because it originally was?

f*kKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK ur gone mate.

i dont know if the rest of SAU remembers this but this same shit happened to me about my cooler.

said that it might interfere with my airbags and that the car needed to be crash tested.

i went to like 4-5diff vicroad offices to clear this thing and was turned down. engineers didnt wanna touch it. but i ran into some luck with a buddy at vic roads hooked me up.

i say good luck buddy, the only way i see u gettn out of this is emoving the cooler and welding up that hole u cut.

its a pain i know but might be the only way.

cheers

wouldnt give him some help........

Ive got mine all in my Gallery (if you want to see the and piping etc)

My I/C is in the factory spot, and i dont have airbags... so we chopped right behind the headlights.

You'll see what i mean in the pics, shortest cooler piping ive seen on a skyline for road-spec :)

Speaking of pulsars. Anyone know if you can put an NA engine into a turbo car and drive it on your p's? I have a mate about to get his licence and he loves the GTIR pulsars. Could he put the NA SR into it and drive it like that on his p's or is it still classified as a turbo because it originally was?

buy a gti pulsar.. is a gtir with an NA SR20.. would have to upgrade the bonnet aswell as it only comes with a standard n14 bonnet..

anyhow.. back on topic..

Speaking of pulsars. Anyone know if you can put an NA engine into a turbo car and drive it on your p's? I have a mate about to get his licence and he loves the GTIR pulsars. Could he put the NA SR into it and drive it like that on his p's or is it still classified as a turbo because it originally was?

nup :(

car came out build plate as turbo so law wont allow

  • 5 months later...

If it didnt come with an airbag from the FACTORY, then no problem.

If you purchased the car and it didnt have an airbag, that doesnt mean anything however.

Its the as is - factory spec that the ruling is draw upon

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • When you crank your car, and hit it with a timing light, can you see a steady crank timing?
    • Oh, forgot to add, A few months ago I was getting mixture codes and the car was using crap loads of fuel. You could smell the unburned fuel in the exhaust, it was crazy strong. Economy was over 17.5 l/100 and usually around 19. I smoked the engine and found a leaky CCV hose which I replaced and then I replaced my two pre cat O2 sensors, I also replaced the MAF. This fixed my mixture codes and improved my exonomy but I'm still 14 - 15 l/100 when pottering about town so something is still amiss. Throttle response is much better and it has more pep but I'd like to know why it's still so thirsty (and I'm hoping that whatever it is gives me a bit more poke).    
    • Car is on factory injectors/z32 maf/ q45 throttle body/ z32 ecu with nistune 
    • Hello all, currently finishing up a rb25 swap into my s14. Having issues with starting, car has spark (confirmed by pulling a plug and watching it spark), has fuel(confirmed by checking pulse/voltage at injectors all spark plugs are soaked in fuel). Car cranks over and pops into the exhaust with a heavy fuel smell but no attempt to start or run, I have torn the timing cover off and triple confirmed timing, turned the CAS in multiple spots both directions, attempted to start with coolant temp and maf unplugged, checked my fuel lines and made sure they weren’t backwards, checked voltage at cas/injectors/coilpacks, made sure all the grounds in the harness are connected and added a few grounding straps (1 from chassis to block, 1 from chassis to head, and 1 from chassis to igniter chip) I am getting stumped here. As a last ditch effort I made a full grounding harness tonight that’s going to run from the battery and add an extra ground from the battery onto the coil pack harness/igniter chip/ intake manifold/ Wiring specialties harness ground/ and alternator. I’m hoping maybe the grounding harness will fix it here but posting here to see if anyone has any other ideas on what else I can check. My fuel pressure is unknown right gauge will be here tomorrow.  IMG_3206.mov
    • yeah I was shocked when I checked my spare OEM on and as below that's how they come from Nissan. (side interesting note new NEO gearbox and replacement park lack the brass bush on the tips and its just all alloy) unsure about damage to the box currently back at 1110 to be pulled down/inspected and selector fork replaced as he built it previously and given the never before seen failure on his billet forks he is replacing it under warranty. He said he has used always OEM the keyway tab without issue for years so it could be an unlucky coincidence. I did talk to him about the sharp corners and stress concentration too. Re: hard shifts i got 7+ years out of the OEM one and the fork itself failed not the keyway. so could be bad luck as I said or an age thing + heat cycles in box and during fabrication of billet?
×
×
  • Create New...