Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 60
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 2 weeks later...
bloody sweet looking rise i would love to have one of those r32 nothing could catch them when they went around bathurst. only the car that could really keep up was dick jonson in his ford cirrea

Not quite:Q. Do you remember that point when 12 laps from the finish and the vicious downpour took a toll on just about everybody including Jim on slicks?

Q. Who was catching up on Dick in his Sierra?

Q. Do you remember who came 3rd?

A. Crompton & Oloffson in another R32 GTR on the same lap...

sorry but diddnt the gtr only win 1 bathurst?? how many did they enter? cause 90 was when the won? n 92 was when v8 supercars came in... i was a baby in this period so i got no idea lol

The GTRs won 2 Bathurst races in 1991 & 1992

As I recall, they won '91 on a dry track and came 1st and 2nd led by Jim Richards & Mark Skaife

Then CAMS changed the rules to cut out turbo cars by end of 1992 to set up the class 'V8 Super'

So the final year that Sierras and GTRs were allowed to race was 1992 and unbelievably, the GTR was served with a 100Kg weight penalty - but not the Sierras. Still, on a dry/wet/dry/wet/dry/wet track, Richards & Skaife still came 1st & Johnson came 2nd & another GTR driven by Oloffson & Crompton came 3rd

It was the year that Denny Hulme's BMW came off the track and he tragically died in hospital

It was a year when the race was cut short because of such bad weather that several cars came off the track at the same time. The downpour was so horrendous that anyone still out there on slicks was sliding all over the place including Jim Richards who ran into a wall and proceeded to try and negotiate down onto Conrod Straight but too many other cars had also run off there as well.

Skaife and Richards were at least 1 lap ahead of Johnson and Oloffson, so they were declared winners.

Ford enthusiasts and rednecks were quite incensed at the decision that they took it out on Richards and Skaife at the presentation. What they don't realise is that Crompton and Oloffson were making up seconds on Johnson with 12 laps to go - and once the track got wet again, it became Skyline territory!

So it was quite feasible that after safety car conditions had ceased, Oloffson's GTR could still have overtaken Johnson.

End result in '92: GTR 1st, Ford Sierra 2nd, GTR 3rd !!

Ask JB Hi Fi or EZYDVD for the DVD of the Highlights of Bathurst 1991-92 for 4Hrs of Channel 7 stuff.

Rest assured, no Ford or Holden guy will buy it. It came out in the past 2 years I believe.

Cheers,

Terry

The GTRs won 2 Bathurst races in 1991 & 1992

As I recall, they won '91 on a dry track and came 1st and 2nd led by Jim Richards & Mark Skaife

Then CAMS changed the rules to cut out turbo cars by end of 1992 to set up the class 'V8 Super'

So the final year that Sierras and GTRs were allowed to race was 1992 and unbelievably, the GTR was served with a 100Kg weight penalty - but not the Sierras. Still, on a dry/wet/dry/wet/dry/wet track, Richards & Skaife still came 1st & Johnson came 2nd & another GTR driven by Oloffson & Crompton came 3rd

It was the year that Denny Hulme's BMW came off the track and he tragically died in hospital

It was a year when the race was cut short because of such bad weather that several cars came off the track at the same time. The downpour was so horrendous that anyone still out there on slicks was sliding all over the place including Jim Richards who ran into a wall and proceeded to try and negotiate down onto Conrod Straight but too many other cars had also run off there as well.

Skaife and Richards were at least 1 lap ahead of Johnson and Oloffson, so they were declared winners.

Ford enthusiasts and rednecks were quite incensed at the decision that they took it out on Richards and Skaife at the presentation. What they don't realise is that Crompton and Oloffson were making up seconds on Johnson with 12 laps to go - and once the track got wet again, it became Skyline territory!

So it was quite feasible that after safety car conditions had ceased, Oloffson's GTR could still have overtaken Johnson.

End result in '92: GTR 1st, Ford Sierra 2nd, GTR 3rd !!

Ask JB Hi Fi or EZYDVD for the DVD of the Highlights of Bathurst 1991-92 for 4Hrs of Channel 7 stuff.

Rest assured, no Ford or Holden guy will buy it. It came out in the past 2 years I believe.

Cheers,

Terry

A few points, mostly pedantic.

1. Richards hit the wall twice. What you see on the television was the result of him trying to return to the pits with three slick shod wheels on his car.

2. The race was not stopped because of the rain it was stopped because of the pile up at Forrest elbow. From memory the leading Corolla in the tiddlers class also ended up in the wall.

3. It is hard to be exact about how far ahead the Skaife/Richards GT-R was simply because the Johnson/Bowe Sierra had called in for wet tyres - something Fred Gibson failed to get right. The Sierra was on the lead lap when the race was red flagged. My dodgy memory is trying to tell me Crompton & Oloffson were not on the lead lap, but I am not 100% sure.

4. There was nothing unbelievable about the Nissan getting handed a 100kg penalty. Almost all the eligible cars got some sort of restriction for 1992.

5. Denny Hulme died of a heart attack. This caused him to go off the track. The off did not cause his death. The loss of a F1 world champion, particularly one as loved as Denny was simple awful.

6. The only video I have found runs to 2 hours. There is a bloke selling full length copies of the race, somewhere.

7. CAMS has to replace the Group A format with something. Either the 5 litre V8's or the 2 litre Super tourer class. Whatever you may think of the V8's given the demise of 2 litre touring cars in Britain as elsewhere it is churlish to criticise CAMS for that decision.

Thanks for that, sounds good. Im actually getting the complete races off a guy :D

BTW: If they raced today with a race prepped R35 GTR the results would still be the same :blush: Holden and Ford have nothing on superior japanese engineering/technology. Perhaps a little biased but my opinion none the less..

Edited by Godzilla32
diddnt the v12 jags win around the same time as the r32?s... google time i think LOL,,, id buy that dvd i dont care if a skyline beat a holden 20 years ago lol.

Tom Walkinshaw bankrolled a pair of XJS V12s in the late 80s - but I forget what year. Yes they did really well (relatively speaking).

The DVD is a whole 4 HRS (not 2).

It's called "Highlights of Bathurst 1000 - 1991 & 1992"

It's distributed by 'Chevron' under license from 7 Network Limited and yes, it came out in 2006

2 hours are devoted to each race - and you might be pleased to know that Jim Richards' famous podium speech in 1992 was NOT edited out.

The reasons as to why the race was terminated are also included - and why Richards and Skaife were awarded 1st position.

The pictures of the Godzilla R32s at the beginning of this thread were the livery of 1992

Enjoy the DVD - And remember...

Never ever record over your wedding video

Soyonara

Tom Walkinshaw bankrolled a pair of XJS V12s in the late 80s - but I forget what year. Yes they did really well (relatively speaking).

The DVD is a whole 4 HRS (not 2).

It's called "Highlights of Bathurst 1000 - 1991 & 1992"

It's distributed by 'Chevron' under license from 7 Network Limited and yes, it came out in 2006

2 hours are devoted to each race - and you might be pleased to know that Jim Richards' famous podium speech in 1992 was NOT edited out.

The reasons as to why the race was terminated are also included - and why Richards and Skaife were awarded 1st position.

The pictures of the Godzilla R32s at the beginning of this thread were the livery of 1992

Enjoy the DVD - And remember...

Never ever record over your wedding video

Soyonara

Jaguar Rover Australia (as it was then) bankrolled the three Jaguars TWR took to Bathurst in 1985. They finished first and third, with one DNF. John Goss & Armin Hahne won the race. Win Percy & Tom Walkinshaw finished third. Second was the Bob Jane liveried BMW 635Csi (in orange) for Johnny Cecotto & Roberto Ravaglia.

The old tapes for 1991 & 1992 from Chevron were each of two hours duration - it sounds like they put the two of them together & ended up with a four hour dvd.

Thanks for that, sounds good. Im actually getting the complete races off a guy :D

BTW: If they raced today with a race prepped R35 GTR the results would still be the same :) Holden and Ford have nothing on superior japanese engineering/technology. Perhaps a little biased but my opinion none the less..

If you want a surprise check the GT-R's qualifying times & compare them to the V8's.

Much of the engineering and technology in the Gibson GT-R's was local. The Gibson Motorsport cars were much, much better than their Japanese Group A coumterparts. The same people who once worked for Freddo on the Gt-R's went on to work on their V8's....

Guest trikdoutvl

this is good 1

how are the lap times or the gtrs compaired to todays v8s im gonna guess the gtr aint gonna be far off the pace, id be surprised if they were faster tho??

1 more sorry lol,,, the cars back then were production car based correct?? so the gtrs would be 206kw??? or were they bombed up

this is good 1

how are the lap times or the gtrs compaired to todays v8s im gonna guess the gtr aint gonna be far off the pace, id be surprised if they were faster tho??

1 more sorry lol,,, the cars back then were production car based correct?? so the gtrs would be 206kw??? or were they bombed up

Off the pace. :) Way off the pace.

In 1991 the car qualified on pole.

Pole Position - #1 Mark Skaife - 2:12.63

Fastest race lap - #2 Mark Skaife - 2:14.50 (new lap record)

In 1992 the car qualified 3rd in a 2:14.546 (Glenn Setons EB Falcon 2.14.971).

Pole Position - #17 Dick Johnson - 2:12.898

Fastest race lap - #1 Mark Skaife - 2:16.47

Last years pole time was a 2.07.0908. So a lazy five seconds. Enough to make Godzilla slower than every V8 on last years grid.

Last years fastest lap - #888 Jamie Whincup - 2:08.4651 (new lap record)

Yes the cars were production based (the group A formula), but any resemblance the car had to a road car was fairly incidental. It had far more than 206kW.

Guest trikdoutvl

thats actually pretty good ay 5 seconds i think the fastest lap done by a v8 was greg murphys commie he did a 2:06 a few years ago but still for a car 20 years old thats good i think especially when u think bathurst is a good track for v8s wit straights...... i rekon the gtr would give a supercar a good run for its money around barbagello raceway....

dont suppose u have times to compaire for the gtr around barbas...

i thought the old touring cars had to be road going cars hence why we had the vl walkingshaw... they built them so they could enter bathurst... so the gtrs u think properly had 5-600hp n coilovers n all that

Guest trikdoutvl

sorry but in regards to a tuff looking car the 32 gtr is not in the same league as the vl walkinshaw now that is a tuff looking muscle car that sends shivers down ur spine,,,,, the gtrs still look mad though they look sleek n fast but i dont think tuff looking is a word to describe them.. tuff is reseverd for v8 muscle cars IMO

Interesting to see the comparison between the GTR's of bathurst and the modern day track times. I wonder what the main difference are? Braking? Tyres compounds?

In my opinion a vl walkinshaw looks like a tank merged with a car. A bodykit that looks like its had one too many big mac's.

I think your on the wrong forum to be saying that about V8 muscle cars. Yes they are tough looking, but you can't over look the toughness of a GTR; in my eyes anyway.

Edited by Godzilla32

lol you cant call that a godzilla! its a dinosaur! haha but yes, it is an ugly car the r32, but it sure did rape them falcons and commies back in the day. i think thats why i have a skyline too now. its like rebellion against the aussies with their fords n holdens, i love my r33 =)

that GT-R looks awesome, and I've no idea how you can call it a dinosaur, maybe the original VL Group A cars (the carby fed HDT ones with the funny bonnet scoop), but not the Godzilla! Watching the old bathurst footage was what made me realise that pushrod V8s were not the only way of making a sports car! Nice pics of the F50 as well.

Driving a R33 around here is hardly a rebellion against 'aussies', meh, but if you prefer the styling of the R33 thats your thing lol, i find the R32 to have a much more sporty look to it personally.

Personally I'd love to see a resurgence of Group A racing, imagine the V35 against HSV/FPV :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I have been being VERY quiet about what you're alluding to, as it is something that ticks me off... The number of cars from factory that run coil overs is HUGE! Most of them these days do... The other part that annoys me, is people saying "Well all the incabin adjustable suspension is illegal by blah blah blah"... If that's the case, then why can I buy a car brand new that can do it if, FULL STOP in cabin adjustable suspension is illegal...   Also, I could just chuck some aftermarket shocks in my car, throw the stock springs on, after my blue slip, dump my super low springs back in. Same shock and spring style setup... Hell, they could also be the same colour springs etc.     I'm voting, BlueSlipper didn't want to touch the above car for some reason. Whether it be some sort of bias against the car, the owner, them maybe having previously done dodgy shit and now they're being super careful in case they get slapped in the face by the Gumbyment again... Find a new blueslip place.   And can confirm as you had said, yes there are holy bibles of vehicle heights, and all sorts of other suspension stuff. Heck your run of the mill mechanic, and tyre shop has access to all of that stuff. It's how they do wheel alignments...
    • Funny story Heading to Sydney this morning on the HWY there was some slow traffic, so I gave it the beans and midway through my overtaking "power run" I lost all power It seems that I missed a hose clamp,  and the MAF and filter went WiFi To make this more problematic, the little tool kit that lives in the boot, is sitting in the sun room at Goulburn......LOL Luckily for me I found a bit of steel on the side of the road that could be used like a rusty and bent flat head screw driver to tighten it up enough that it got me into Sydney, it is now all tight like a tiger with the aid of a 8mm socket Note to self: Use my brain and double check stuff, and always keep that little tool kit in the car for when I have a brain fart
    • Oh, and as for everyone with their fuel economy changes, I switch between E10 and 98 in the company car. Even do when I had personal cars that could run on E10. You know what changed my fuel economy in any noticeable way? How I drove, and where I drove. Otherwise, say on full tanks of just back and forth from work only (So same trips, same sort of traffic), couldn't notice a difference that I can correlate to the type of fuel in use. In the current vehicle, that's over 42L of USABLE fuel. While 98 is all "more energy dense", it also has higher knock resistance as it takes more energy to get it to ignite too. The longer hydrocarbons, typically more tightly bound. So running the same ignition map, can also produce less power, if there isn't enough time to get it all burnt through properly, as yep, the flame propagation speed is different from lower octane fuel to higher (Higher has a lower flame propagation, due to the more tightly bound and harder to self ignite funs. This is also typically where, a vehicle that is designed purely to run on 91 (Whether it be E10 or normal 91) usually sees absolutely no real world difference in fuel economy for the normal man, woman, or dog.
    • We've got some servos around me that have 91 with E10, 91 (no E10), 95, and 98. At those stations the change from 91 E10 to 91, is typically around 8c/L.   But lets not get started on the price of fuel in Oz. It's ridiculous. All the service stations around me, bar one, the price of fuel has been over the $2 mark per litre for the cheapest, 98 being around $2.45. That one service station is a CostCo, fuel from it comes from the same refineries, and makes no pitstops, it runs great, including the 98. In fact, I've had no issues on CostCo fuel, but plenty of issues at other stations!. The CostCo fuel, was $1.65 roughly this week for 94 with E10. $1.88 for 98. Servos directly across from it, $2.10 for 91 E10, and $2.48 for 98. The part I had to laugh at? If I drive multiple HOURS away from Brisbane, say out near Nanango, or Kingaroy, or even out to Goondiwindi, the price of their fuel, is the same as what it is at the CostCo... Oh, and that BP servo at Goondiwindi is HUGE and goes through epic turnover of fuel, so it's not sitting there for weeks going to shit. And what blows me away, my mate is one of the people who drives the Fuel Tanker all around QLD, delivering to all those places. At the same company his previous role was doing the "local haul" deliveries... Same truck, same driver, same pickup point it all comes from. So you tell me, how the hell it is 60c/L CHEAPER for fuel, when nearly all else is equal, except they require a B-Double to drive half a day out of Brisbane, and half a day back, every second day, compared to the delivery that can be under 30 minutes drive from the fuel pickup point... Not to mention, go five blocks down the road, and Ampol to Ampol will vary 30c/L... And I've had this conversation with my mate... The way it's priced, is just typical, pure and utter rubbish... He also does runs from Brisbane, to all over QLD, down to Newcastle, Sydney, Nowra, Melbourne, Geelong, and even out to parts of the NT depending on the companies needs. His main stuff is all the longer distance away from home for a few days at a time, then when he's back, he loves to just pickup extra shifts wherever he can in whichever truck, hence all the weird different places.   Oh, as for getting E10 into all the fuels in Australia... It was very quickly highlighted, that we don't have enough biomass available to use to make E10 sustainably like they require, and it would dramatically cut into our, and the worlds food chain supply...   I vote we all just start running on liquid methane gas... Plenty of that just getting tapped off at tips from underground decay... (Note, this is pure just stupid commenting. I could very easily highlight the reasons its not a good idea especially on scale...)
    • Am I correct in assuming that the R35's are getting the classic skyline haircut off the odometer?  Quick search on carsales, there are 33 08 and 09 GTR's for sale, only 2 of them have more then 100,000km's on them (116,075 and 110,000 respectively).  And somehow there are about 25 for sale with around 60,000kms? Looks like the classic skyline haircut to me =/
×
×
  • Create New...