Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

probably a stupid question

i was looking at a HPI Stainless Exhaust Manifold (low mount) for my R32 RB20 and was wondering if it does anything to my performace or sound of the engine??

or is this simply an autosalon mod

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/223456-stainless-exhaust-manifold/
Share on other sites

personally.... I dont like them...sure they look good, but they do not contain the heat in like a cast manifold will. Some say the more efficient design brings on boost earlier. yet others say that due to the manifold losing so much heat there is less of it their to aid in exhaust gas velocity...So who knows !... On a GTR they would be a waste of money ...but on a GTST.....?

personally for a low mount setup i would just use the cast manifold, if you want to go a bit crazy get it honed and cleaned up then ceramic coat it. Low mount s/s setups are reknown for cracking

If you want anymore than that, just go a highmount with a bigger turbo

haha, yeah you wouldnt want to high mount the stock turbo = ghey :)

i would just clean up the stock manifold, its not going to look as pretty as a golden s/s setup, but atleast you wont be taking the turbo off in 12months time to replace a cracked manifold

yeah its is, but something that cramped, with such big bends in a small place i wouldnt trust under the sort of heat a manifold reaches, especially being stainless

My GTR-S low mount was far less cramped than the current top mount. Plus it was in the main air stream going out of the under bonnet area and flowing down beside the engine and gearbox. The pipework ran much cooler than the current top mount, which has very little, if any, airflow past it.

Cheers

Gary

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hope you aren't too sore after that one, might take a day or 2 to notice yet and I guess it is a loooooong drive home. On the bright side, tube frame front end is a thing at superlap, right?
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/p/18rmVb1SKB/ 
    • The chart of front pressure to rear pressure (with one being on the x axis and the other being on the y axis) is not a straight line on a typical proportioning valve. At lower pressures there is a straight line with one slope, and at higher pressures that changes to a lower slope. That creates a bend in the line at that pressure, called the knee point. If you do not change the proportionng as the pressure gets higher, you will suffer excessive pressure (at one end of the car or the other, depending on which way you look at the proportioning action) and then get lockups at that end. The HFM BM57, from my memory of previous discussions, is based on the BM57 from a different car (to a Skyline), with a different requirement for the location of the knee point and the distribution of pressure front to rear, and so is not a good choice for an upgrade on a Skyline. Here's a couple of links to some old posts, one from here, one from elsewhere. A lot of it pertains to adjustable prop valves, but the idea is the same. There are plenty of discussions on here about this issue from al the many years of people wanting a cheap/accessible option. https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/grm/learn-me-brake-proportioning-valves/236880/page1/ https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/grm/learn-me-brake-proportioning-valves/236880/page1/  
    • Yeah dunno why johhny posted that here with no context, just post on FB/insta bro where he put it up?  Laine had an off at T4 during Thurs prac, he's ok, car is less than perfect, they are done for the weekend, he can fill in the rest. Bando also binned it like 100m up the road.   
    • I feel there must have been a FB/insta post and the weekend did not start well at all I hope everyone is all okay
×
×
  • Create New...