Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys...

Had my car on the dyno yesterday, pulled 160.9 rwkw

IMG_5117.jpg

Showed the sheet to a mate of mine and he said that the air fuel ratios are a bit out of wack.

He recons a boost controler will fix this issue and ill br able to get more power out of it

Just wanting to know what u guys think about it and what some of your recomendations would be

Car is a stock R34 GTT

Cheers mick

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/228935-had-dyno-run-and-need-an-opinion/
Share on other sites

Well for a state, your mate - dont listen to him :D

More boost is likely more than not, to flip the ECU out and then you'll have a massive power dip around 4000-5000rpm.

What you need is a band-air interceptor (S-AFC etc) or a full ECU (PowerFC etc), thats the only way to solve that problem

SAFC to fix the AFRs or come down to Sydney and have Toshi remap your stock ECU (you can find him on the forums here).

You're running very rich at the moment .. safe AFRs are 11.5:1 at the top end and you're at less than 10:1

I'm surprised you're making that much power with a stocker that's running so rich ... I was making around 150rwkw with a stocker + turbo back exhaust, now at 190rwkw with turbo back and boost controller at 11psi and Toshi's ecu remap.

If you're going to get a boost controller, get it before any tune so that the ecu can be tuned with the new higher boost ... otherwise you'll pay twice.

Edited by Delta Force

Hi Delta Force.

EJD001

R34 can not boosted up more than around 12psi.

Because ignition timing will retard around 12psi.

Its same R33.

Also R34 boosted up under 12psi , it will ping at 3600-4400rpm when the accelerator is put down on street.

Because R34 ignition map is 3600-4400rpm very hi ignition timing for Australia fuel.(maybe 100 octane fuel is OK)

You need remap or PFC(need tune).

lol @ looks normal..

no it doesnt lol thats really really fkn rich.. a stock computer wil never flatline a dyno. thats rich as f**k, 10:1 is fkn super super rich and thats considering that it flatlines there.. who really knows how rich its running

get it tuned champ and ull enjoy more power and better fuel economy while thrashin :rofl:

fuel economy is not too bad... did a run from gosford to bathurst and back and used one and a bit tanks. but i got 510km before having to fill... ofcourse hghway driving is the big factor there!

So u think im better off just getting a PFC or getting the standard ecu looked at.

In the future i am going to go for larger numbers, thats y im leaning towards a PFC

Edited by EJD001

My R34 made 161rwkw with a cat back exhuast and around 11psi. Once again operator said she was running very rich

I had never noticed the flat spot. Until recently, feels like a massive second kick somewhere near 6 and she starts going again! :rofl: stupid factory comp. Im definitely getting the flat spot now.

Its possible the boost is running mine too rich and probably robbing some power.

Here is my graph. Because it was a simple cheap power run the print out doesnt include the afr etc.

dynoyv9.jpg

Edited by Granthem

i cant work out y im getting such good figures..

Like grant, he has upped the boost and put on a exhaust and its making the same power as my car, which i havent upped the boost or done any mods to!

Cars are so fun sometimes!

Yeh dynos change from place to place.

Easiest way is to track it.

Currently my car has run a best of 14.0 and more importantly at a best of 99mph. So i guess its pretty close to 160rwkw in a chunker of a car to get that top end speed.

Throw yours on the strip and find out what she pulls. Without the boost increase, my car was running 92-93mph. If your cracking much more then that, your lucky and got a freak of an engine :rofl:

now looking into a PFC...

Should i be looking at a second hand one or brand new.... is there much that can go wrong with a second hand unt?

Price will be the big difference aswell i would think!

Thanks to everyone for their input so far...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...