Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi guys. im sorry if this is on the wrong section but i couldnt find it anywhere and thought i would just put it in here.

if people could just put down what they have done for weight reduction of any form that would be very helpfull.

also the benefits of for example a lightened flywheel

thankyou

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/229769-weight-reduction/
Share on other sites

Only use weight reduction measures seriosuly for trackdays or drags.

Take out back seat, spare wheel, subs, anything heavy, carbon fibre bonnet, half tank fuel.

Light weight rims make a big difference in speed also.

oh ok.. well what about a lightened flywheel., how much can that cost and what are the benifits

oh ok.. well what about a lightened flywheel., how much can that cost and what are the benifits

They are about $400 odd.

The benefits is that the engine will rev out quicker as there is less unsprung mass bearing down upon the engine.. Same thing goes for lightened drive shafts.

Down side off lightened flywheels is that its harder to get the car off the line quickly and is easier to stall. Another down side is that a lightened flywheel can't cope with high temperatures and can develop stress fractures and this can transfer over to the clutch.

In terms of weight saving.. how hardcore do you wanna go? On top of what DR180 said.. you can also remove;

Sound deadening

Power steering

Air con

power windows

audio items

fibreglass quarter panels

fixed back carbonfiber/kevlar/fiberglass race seats

choped reo bars

Edited by GTS4WD

There isn't much you can remove/lighten without a compromise. I mean safety/defects/expense/extra noise

IMO only take the above advice (it's all correct) if you're serious about circuit/drag and have some dollars to spend on lighter parts. The heavy bits are up front, but are expensive to replace (bonnet, fenders, engine components). SO removing too much from the rear (speakers, spare, tool bag, boot trim, rear seat, wing etc) will worsen the weight distribution. Expect less grip where it's needed most.

A fair few people here have returned their flywheels back to stock after going lightened. It's annoying to drive on the roads.

IMO the best thing for a street car is try not to ADD weight, as a minimum.

Hope you work it out mate. Cheers :rofl:

Edited by R338OY
hi guys. im sorry if this is on the wrong section but i couldnt find it anywhere and thought i would just put it in here.

if people could just put down what they have done for weight reduction of any form that would be very helpfull.

also the benefits of for example a lightened flywheel

thankyou

what car are you working off as the base?

ay guys sorry to but in but whilst talking about weight distro i guessed wouldnt mind, i am thinking of dyno matting the boot space entirely to improve sub sound and kill road noise a bit do you recon that its worth the effort and $$$

Depends how badly you want to increase the sound.

dude just eat less... im lucky to be not a massive guy (175cms, 55kg) so that helps :(

not a massive guy? lol at that weight your not half a massive guy, lol...

Some thing thats not mentioned so much here that ill add, is that rotating weight means more than static weight (static weight being dead weight held by suspension, and rotating being, engine/drive train)

So lighter wheels, drive shaft, clutch, flywheel, balencer, even crank/rods/pistons all make a big difference. As for lightened flywheels being undrivable? I think the opposite, i love my light flywheel, makes down shift throttle blips so quick, effortless and smooth, car revs quicker etc. No problems with stalling etc, might be more noticed on laggier turbo cars etc, also depends on your gearing etc (i have fairly short gearing for a 3L @ 3.9:1). Lightweight wheels make a big difference also, even brakes....

what was mentioned with the weight distribution is correct, but you can change your suspension accordingly to suit. I don't have a spare or jack etc, i run an rb20det gearbox (lighter than 25det) but have my battery in my boot to help out distribution (if its a 32) you could also get a lighter battery. Less fuel in the tank, pretty much anything else you can look at and replace with some thing lighter or remove all together, sound deadening/carpet, aircon condenser + radiator, shit behind dash, stereo gear, replace window glass, exhaust, windscreen washer and full radiator overflow, whatever floats your boat.

but remember, theres not tooo much of a gain with removing static weight you'll be able to shed, so its about compromises for performance vs comfort, for example, its a bit of work but you can probably take over 20kg of sound deadening/carpet/underlay just out of the cabin, but do you want the noise and vibration?

unless its dedicated track or your going for broke, I'd leave it stock appart from easily removable items, like rear seat (that you can put back in), and lightened drive train, if thats what your into.

Another down point of lightened flywheels is that you will get less engine brake when chaning down gears..

This may sound massively pedantic, but what you have said is not 100% correct.

Basically a heavier flywheel needs more energy to increase its rpm relative to a lighter unit.

So when you change down a gear it will INITIALLY give you more engine braking.

However after that point it will give you less engine braking because its greater stored energy (kinetic energy - again relative to a lighter unit) needs to be soaked up by engine friction & braking etc.

So basically a heavier flywheel will absorb more energy to get it up to speed, but then give it back when you try and brake.

As an aside that means when you don't change down gears a lightened flywheel will increase your braking performance. :(

As an aside that means when you don't change down gears a lightened flywheel will increase your braking performance. :)

Under braking.. the force of the wheels slowing down Via braking) is greater than the force of ineria and gravity acting on the the flywheel to slow it down..

So the force of the brakes slowing the the car and hence the engine, as it is in gear, will over come the force of the flywheel attempting to slow the engine down..

And besides.. its easier to stop/slow down a rotating object of less mass than one with more.

hmmm i think the easiest way to describe the gts4 in my shed is what is in it rather than what isnt in it,

interior wise,

a seat

2 seat rails

3 pedals

a handbrake

a gear lever

a steering column and wheel

1 seat belt.

the dash board has been hollowed out to a shell of it's former self leaving only the things required by law, i e the fan to the windscreen, indicator stalk, light switch, hazard light switch, window wiper switch and gauges. oh and a horn.

doesnt have a roll cage yet

under the car

all components related to the suspension and drive line,

all plastic and anything bolted to the chassis that doesnt help performance is gone.

the bumpers are fibre glass skins with no subframes, the bonnet is the same, along with the gaurds and side skirts,

im currently saving for fibreglass rear qauters and may skin the doors if i can find sombody who can do them.

so far it has gone from a curb wieght of 1420 kgs down to 1158 kgs.

i think if this was done to a gtst it would be even lighter not having the 4wd system.

Under braking.. the force of the wheels slowing down Via braking) is greater than the force of ineria and gravity acting on the the flywheel to slow it down..

So the force of the brakes slowing the the car and hence the engine, as it is in gear, will over come the force of the flywheel attempting to slow the engine down..

And besides.. its easier to stop/slow down a rotating object of less mass than one with more.

I have no idea what you are trying to say. Something about gravity, right? :)

Braking friction & engine friction (or pumping losses if you like) both act to remove energy from the car & hence slow it down.

The kinetic energy of the flywheel constitutes part of the energy needing removal.

The less kinetic energy a car has (for a given speed) the easier it is to slow down.

A lighter flywheel stores less kinetic energy....

If you are changing gears (either up or down) you are simply trading some linear kinetic energy (ie of the car going forward) for some rotational kinetic energy (ie the flywheel going around). All of the energy (whether linear or rotational) needs to be gotten rid of to slow the car (assuming it is in gear). The advantage of the lightened flywheel is less energy is needed to spin up what is ultimately a useless piece of junk and can instead go into making the car go quicker in a straight line.

Anyway the heirachy of dealing with weight goes in the following order.

1. Reduce unsprung weight.

2. Reduce the inertia of any rotating components.

3. Reduce static weight.

4. Relocate weight, ie lower, away from the more heavilly loaded axle and closer to the middle of the car.

Basically item 1 is the most important & then in descending order items 2, 3 & 4. At the end of the day, though, you do what you can.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I have been being VERY quiet about what you're alluding to, as it is something that ticks me off... The number of cars from factory that run coil overs is HUGE! Most of them these days do... The other part that annoys me, is people saying "Well all the incabin adjustable suspension is illegal by blah blah blah"... If that's the case, then why can I buy a car brand new that can do it if, FULL STOP in cabin adjustable suspension is illegal...   Also, I could just chuck some aftermarket shocks in my car, throw the stock springs on, after my blue slip, dump my super low springs back in. Same shock and spring style setup... Hell, they could also be the same colour springs etc.     I'm voting, BlueSlipper didn't want to touch the above car for some reason. Whether it be some sort of bias against the car, the owner, them maybe having previously done dodgy shit and now they're being super careful in case they get slapped in the face by the Gumbyment again... Find a new blueslip place.   And can confirm as you had said, yes there are holy bibles of vehicle heights, and all sorts of other suspension stuff. Heck your run of the mill mechanic, and tyre shop has access to all of that stuff. It's how they do wheel alignments...
    • Funny story Heading to Sydney this morning on the HWY there was some slow traffic, so I gave it the beans and midway through my overtaking "power run" I lost all power It seems that I missed a hose clamp,  and the MAF and filter went WiFi To make this more problematic, the little tool kit that lives in the boot, is sitting in the sun room at Goulburn......LOL Luckily for me I found a bit of steel on the side of the road that could be used like a rusty and bent flat head screw driver to tighten it up enough that it got me into Sydney, it is now all tight like a tiger with the aid of a 8mm socket Note to self: Use my brain and double check stuff, and always keep that little tool kit in the car for when I have a brain fart
    • Oh, and as for everyone with their fuel economy changes, I switch between E10 and 98 in the company car. Even do when I had personal cars that could run on E10. You know what changed my fuel economy in any noticeable way? How I drove, and where I drove. Otherwise, say on full tanks of just back and forth from work only (So same trips, same sort of traffic), couldn't notice a difference that I can correlate to the type of fuel in use. In the current vehicle, that's over 42L of USABLE fuel. While 98 is all "more energy dense", it also has higher knock resistance as it takes more energy to get it to ignite too. The longer hydrocarbons, typically more tightly bound. So running the same ignition map, can also produce less power, if there isn't enough time to get it all burnt through properly, as yep, the flame propagation speed is different from lower octane fuel to higher (Higher has a lower flame propagation, due to the more tightly bound and harder to self ignite funs. This is also typically where, a vehicle that is designed purely to run on 91 (Whether it be E10 or normal 91) usually sees absolutely no real world difference in fuel economy for the normal man, woman, or dog.
    • We've got some servos around me that have 91 with E10, 91 (no E10), 95, and 98. At those stations the change from 91 E10 to 91, is typically around 8c/L.   But lets not get started on the price of fuel in Oz. It's ridiculous. All the service stations around me, bar one, the price of fuel has been over the $2 mark per litre for the cheapest, 98 being around $2.45. That one service station is a CostCo, fuel from it comes from the same refineries, and makes no pitstops, it runs great, including the 98. In fact, I've had no issues on CostCo fuel, but plenty of issues at other stations!. The CostCo fuel, was $1.65 roughly this week for 94 with E10. $1.88 for 98. Servos directly across from it, $2.10 for 91 E10, and $2.48 for 98. The part I had to laugh at? If I drive multiple HOURS away from Brisbane, say out near Nanango, or Kingaroy, or even out to Goondiwindi, the price of their fuel, is the same as what it is at the CostCo... Oh, and that BP servo at Goondiwindi is HUGE and goes through epic turnover of fuel, so it's not sitting there for weeks going to shit. And what blows me away, my mate is one of the people who drives the Fuel Tanker all around QLD, delivering to all those places. At the same company his previous role was doing the "local haul" deliveries... Same truck, same driver, same pickup point it all comes from. So you tell me, how the hell it is 60c/L CHEAPER for fuel, when nearly all else is equal, except they require a B-Double to drive half a day out of Brisbane, and half a day back, every second day, compared to the delivery that can be under 30 minutes drive from the fuel pickup point... Not to mention, go five blocks down the road, and Ampol to Ampol will vary 30c/L... And I've had this conversation with my mate... The way it's priced, is just typical, pure and utter rubbish... He also does runs from Brisbane, to all over QLD, down to Newcastle, Sydney, Nowra, Melbourne, Geelong, and even out to parts of the NT depending on the companies needs. His main stuff is all the longer distance away from home for a few days at a time, then when he's back, he loves to just pickup extra shifts wherever he can in whichever truck, hence all the weird different places.   Oh, as for getting E10 into all the fuels in Australia... It was very quickly highlighted, that we don't have enough biomass available to use to make E10 sustainably like they require, and it would dramatically cut into our, and the worlds food chain supply...   I vote we all just start running on liquid methane gas... Plenty of that just getting tapped off at tips from underground decay... (Note, this is pure just stupid commenting. I could very easily highlight the reasons its not a good idea especially on scale...)
    • Am I correct in assuming that the R35's are getting the classic skyline haircut off the odometer?  Quick search on carsales, there are 33 08 and 09 GTR's for sale, only 2 of them have more then 100,000km's on them (116,075 and 110,000 respectively).  And somehow there are about 25 for sale with around 60,000kms? Looks like the classic skyline haircut to me =/
×
×
  • Create New...