Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys, just wanted to run this by those more knowledgeable than myself.

I went up the coast for the weekend, and about 100k in, my check engine light came on for about five seconds then went off.

This happened a few more times through out the trip, sometimes only staying on for a second, sometimes longer.

Model: 98 S2 25t x four

Car seems to run fine. (although exhaust did smell a little rich on cold start.)

all fluid levels ok

plugs just replaced and new set of Splitfires installed.

Did the bit self diagnosis thing....(I think correctly)

turned ignition to on.

bridged the two points with wire for 2 seconds then removed.

Engine check light flashed 3 slow flashes, then 3 fast flashes.

SO, does this mean replace the oxygen sensor, and if so, is the EL falcon one ok for the S2 (replacing the EL connector with the stag one)

sorry if my discription is confusing,

cheers

Gerard

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/229840-oxygen-sensor/
Share on other sites

last time i did mine I found it easier to just splice the bare wires together for the EL O2 sensor to Nissan connector, instead of pulling the connector apart, but I was being lazy. Worth checking the price on a new NGK one, they list a part number for the R33, should be same, someone can confirm. see pic.

post-780-1217153301_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/229840-oxygen-sensor/#findComment-4039525
Share on other sites

last time i did mine I found it easier to just splice the bare wires together for the EL O2 sensor to Nissan connector, instead of pulling the connector apart, but I was being lazy. Worth checking the price on a new NGK one, they list a part number for the R33, should be same, someone can confirm. see pic.
It seems the NGK OZA395-E2 (Pulsar N14/N1, R33 Rb25DET) fits (plug as well? although the plug does not work for R34/neo). Its all in the O2 thread in the DIY section under "servicing" .
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/229840-oxygen-sensor/#findComment-4039983
Share on other sites

Hi there, can you post cost of N14 O2 sensor & supplier please? Or pm if you prefer?

Cheers GW

I have been delaying with Global EFI for my O2 sensors. They seem to know what they are doing, have good prices and stock available. 5531 0055. THey sent me a NGK OZA395-E2 the other day. Their part number was 351-0040. Please confirm with them that the plug and thread size is suitable for a RB25DET. Mine is for the RB26DETT. They may be the same. I will find out soon.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/229840-oxygen-sensor/#findComment-4057590
Share on other sites

My post from the main O2 sensor thread:

Horray! Success!!

The O2 sensor socket arrived yesterday so last night I got stuck into the 260RS and switched over the O2 sensors. After much swearing and 3 HOURS, the job was done.

I used NTK sensors that had the following number on the case OZA395-E2 KBA16693. They were ordered from Global EFI with part number 351-0040. Once the job was done, I stuck on Consult (at 12:30 at night) and watched the the voltage of both sensors flick up and down like it should at cruise (before, 1 sensor was doing pretty much nothing). The car seemed to idle nicer (I have had idle problems since I bought it), but this could just be in my head. I'm waiting for my wife to tell me how it cold-started this morning.

I noticed the following things from this job:

-The stock sensors are Zirconia, not Titania. I can't confirm that the R33 GTR is identical to the 260RS, but I'm told this is the case.

-The leads on the new sensors were shorter than the old ones. This means I couldn't clip the lead onto all of the little guides, but at least they reached.

-The rear sensor has a rectangular plug that fitted perfectly. The front sensor had a square shaped plug that was different. It was an easy job to unpick the connectors from the new plug and re-use the old plug. This meant that I didn't need to join wires or anything nasty like that :P

-From what I've read in the past, I thought it was the rear sensor that had the square plug. Perhaps people are confused because the plugs that the O2 sensors go to are sat side by side. However, the front sensor goes to the rear plug and the rear sensor goes to the front plug!

So there you go... the Stagea 260RS (and possibly R33 GTR) take the same Zirconia sensors as the GTS-T and at $77 from GLobal EFI, you can't really go wrong :woot:

I'm very happy. Thanks heaps for all the advice guys.

Edited by BoostedBarge
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/229840-oxygen-sensor/#findComment-4064782
Share on other sites

Just grabbed an OZA395-E2 from Coventrys. Had a list price of $154 ex, but with a bit of "c'mon mate" how about showin a bit of love and givin me trade......$80 inc. Not a bad return for a simple question!

richard

Edited by rb
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/229840-oxygen-sensor/#findComment-4076130
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

i know this is a old thread but i had one of these in my 2000 s2 stagea and it made alot of problems.. once on boost at about 4000rpm you would get like a fuel cut type feel.. it would loose all power for about 1-2seconds.

once i put the original one back in the car was fine.. just some more info

THnaks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/229840-oxygen-sensor/#findComment-4596736
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...