Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

well - that's obviously taking things too far - but i have a few questions

in perth - there are "bike/bus" lanes, which buses and cycles share - in sydney, where do bikes go? general roads are too dangerous half the time and cyclists run the risk of dieing or being cleaned up, footpaths are dangerous too because pedestrians go on them,. so where are cyclists supposed to go??

i've had my share of close calls with motorists who feel the need to do "whatever it takes" to overtake me (even if it means putting lives at risk) just to pass me - they don't factor in that i'm doing a similar speed to them.. and i admit there have been times i've nearly been hit that i completely lose my temper - i've been known to smack a window or two in my time, or scream at the odd driver that cuts me off so they can pull into chicken treat that 5 seconds earlier... physical violence is TOO FAR of course...

but the way the journalist has portrayed cyclists in that article is laughable - cyclists illegally using the transit lanes? where ELSE do cyclists go?

i was under the impression cyclists were allowed in translit lanes in qld too

i love that they are putting up "61 no bicycle" signs hahah

should bikes used on the road have rego?

have i just started a debate? or brought up old discussion

i was under the impression cyclists were allowed in translit lanes in qld too

i love that they are putting up "61 no bicycle" signs hahah

should bikes used on the road have rego?

have i just started a debate? or brought up old discussion

Thats a piss weak argument considering bikes would need centuries of use on a road to do the damage cars would do in a day.

After all, registration costs are to maintain the roads in a user pays system, and I dont see any space in current cities (sydney) for a dedicated user pays cyclist lane, so you can't really introduce new infrastructure for them

i wasnt refering as much to cyclists paying, more that they would be able identified - as this seems the drama in the article

i agree they should be allowed in the transit lanes - far better than on the line between the transit lane and the far left hand "non transit" lane (if you get me

yeah - why should a cyclist pay registration fees?

no pollution, no road damage, no parking spaces, also - cycles don't hit people or crash into people and kill them...

during the 1990's i remember there was so much publicity and media promotion for people to ride bikes in australia, "look left, look right, look BIKE" (remember that?)

or

"burn fat - not oil"

etc etc

or 'give way to cyclists"

there used to be a lot of government propaganda about how you need to be cyclist aware on the roads - this has dissipated (sp) over the last 5-10 years, as a result, motorists are more vigilant, ignorant, and selfish on the shared roads.

you may not notice it - and this may not be the case over east, but in front of the line of every traffic light, there are 5 diamonds and a picture of a bike painted on the road, this denotes that area is to be left vacant for if there is a cyclist present, so that the cyclist can be noticed and thus not run over as cars jock for lane changes and traffic light races.

it's a dangerous world out there for cyclists... not to mention idiot teenage minded guys who throw maccas cups at you or swear at you as they drive past you... which - is obviously frightening, last thing you need when you're pedalling in a field of ignorant drivers is to be startled or have your concentration comprimised.

it also upsets me when (these are the most common for this attitude) female drivers openly express their views in conversation that when ever they se a cyclist on the road they "drive right up their arse and toot the horn - they have no right to be on my roads" (actual quote - one of many)

bikes have every right to be on the road - it's a legal requirement, it's just not advertised so people think they have the right to play judge jury and executioner because "we pay registration fees and you don't"

the attitudes of motorists needs to be shaken up. but it will take government awareness to acheive this

i can see some valid points in registration for bikes for identification reasons. but a user pays system would cripple the bike industry. and there are too many holes in the idea. what happens if you happen to feel like dusting the bike off for the first time in years to ride down to the shops but haven't got any registration? do you run the risk of getting booked or do you get registration even though you never ride the bike just in case you one day in 5 years time may decide to ride your bike. and what about kids? do they need it as well? and who has to do all the paperwork? do bikeshops have to sort it all out when they sell a bike or does the customer do it themselves once they have bought the bike? and if the customer does it, can they ride straight away, or do they have to wait until it turns up? and what sort of identification do you use? number plates? they would have to be plastic or there would be injuries when people crashed.

as for a user pays system, that would result in a massive decline in cyclists having the following negative effects:

more polution

more traffic on the roads

more crowded public transport

more fat people, which puts more strain on the public health system in both financial terms and waiting list times

higher unemployment due to lots of jobs lost from the bike industry.

as for the argument that cyclists should pay because of all the cycle paths being put in around the cities, well that is just stupid. how many pedestrians do you see using them? plenty. probably just as many pedestrians as cyclists. if you are going to make cyclists pay on that basis, then pedestrians should be charged a registration to pay for footpaths, and the painting of crossings on the road, etc.

How about this bike. Seems to be of good value from aldi - tempted to get one - seems to have all the right bits for the money spent. The local aldo is not selling it for $249 but for $209 instead.

http://www.aldi.com.au/au/html/offers/2827_6093.htm

How about this bike. Seems to be of good value from aldi - tempted to get one - seems to have all the right bits for the money spent. The local aldo is not selling it for $249 but for $209 instead.

http://www.aldi.com.au/au/html/offers/2827_6093.htm

oh dear son of rajab....... *facepalm

the ONLY thing on that bike that is any good is the rear derailleur. the rest of the bike is shit. the forks are cheap shit. the brakes are cheap shit and won't work very well, the frame is cheap shit alloy and will weigh more than a steel frame, the shifters are cheap shit non shimano items and will start to seize up after a few rides, the wheels are cheap shit and if you ride it often you will be lucky to get 6 months out of them before the hubs collapse, and finally it is a dual suspension, so that makes it even heavier and you will very quickly get sick of the bike 'bobbing' up and down every time you pedal.

oh dear son of rajab....... *facepalm

the ONLY thing on that bike that is any good is the rear derailleur. the rest of the bike is shit. the forks are cheap shit. the brakes are cheap shit and won't work very well, the frame is cheap shit alloy and will weigh more than a steel frame, the shifters are cheap shit non shimano items and will start to seize up after a few rides, the wheels are cheap shit and if you ride it often you will be lucky to get 6 months out of them before the hubs collapse, and finally it is a dual suspension, so that makes it even heavier and you will very quickly get sick of the bike 'bobbing' up and down every time you pedal.

Thanks for the info :(

as for the argument that cyclists should pay because of all the cycle paths being put in around the cities, well that is just stupid. how many pedestrians do you see using them? plenty. probably just as many pedestrians as cyclists. if you are going to make cyclists pay on that basis, then pedestrians should be charged a registration to pay for footpaths, and the painting of crossings on the road, etc.

+1

Given the R-tarded nature of our politians & their revenue raising laws .. its a possibility.. They think cyclists pose a danger to pedestrians...Also once you consider they are trying to seperate the 2 means of transport, in a risk assessment pov, possibly they will do it, why do u think they moved cyclists from footpaths to the road. (which is clearly more dangerous). this then provides the grounds nessesary to indentify cycles as 'Vehicles' of transport that can be targeted for more revenue raising.. :??

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • From there, it is really just test and assemble. Plug the adapter cables from the unit into the back of the screen, then the other side to the car harness. Don't forget all the other plugs too! Run the cables behind the unit and screw it back into place (4 screws) and you should now have 3 cables to run from the top screen to the android unit. I ran them along the DS of the other AV units in the gap between their backets and the console, and used some corrugated tubing on the sharp edges of the bracket so the wires were safe. Plug the centre console and lower screen in temporarily and turn the car to ACC, the AV should fire up as normal. Hold the back button for 3 sec and Android should appear on the top screen. You need to set the input to Aux for audio (more on that later). I put the unit under the AC duct in the centre console, with the wifi antenna on top of the AC duct near the shifter, the bluetooth antenna on the AC duct under the centre console The GPS unit on top of the DS to AC duct; they all seem to work OK there are are out of the way. Neat cable routing is a pain. For the drive recorder I mounted it near the rear view mirror and run the cable in the headlining, across the a pillar and then down the inside of the a pillar seal to the DS lower dash. From there it goes across and to one USB input for the unit. The second USB input is attached to the ECUtec OBD dongle and the 3rd goes to the USB bulkhead connected I added in the centre console. This is how the centre console looks "tidied" up Note I didn't install the provided speaker, didn't use the 2.5mm IPod in line or the piggyback loom for the Ipod or change any DIP switches; they seem to only be required if you need to use the Ipod input rather than the AUX input. That's it, install done, I'll follow up with a separate post on how the unit works, but in summary it retains all factory functions and inputs (so I still use my phone to the car for calls), reverse still works like factory etc.
    • Place the new daughterboard in the case and mount it using the 3 small black rivets provided, and reconnect the 3 factory ribbon cables to the new board Then, use the 3 piggyback cables from the daughterboard into the factory board on top (there are stand offs in the case to keep them apart. and remember to reconnect the antenna and rear cover fan wires. 1 screw to hold the motherboard in place. Before closing the case, make a hole in the sticker covering a hole in the case and run the cable for the android unit into the plug there. The video forgot this step, so did I, so will you probably. Then redo the 4 screws on back, 2 each top and bottom, 3 each side and put the 2 brackets back on.....all ready to go and not that tricky really.      
    • Onto the android unit. You need to remove the top screen because there is a daughterboard to put inside the case. Each side vent pops out from clips; start at the bottom and carefully remove upwards (use a trim remover tool to avoid breaking anything). Then the lower screen and controls come out, 4 screws, a couple of clips (including 3 flimsy ones at the top) and 3 plugs on the rear. Then the upper screen, 4 screws and a bunch of plugs and she is out. From there, remove the mounting brackets (2 screws each), 4 screws on the rear, 2 screws top and bottom and 3 screws holding in the small plates on each side. When you remove the back cover (tight fit), watch out for the power cable for the fan, I removed it so I could put the back aside. The mainboard is held in by 1 screw in the middle, 1 aerial at the top and 3 ribbon cables. If you've ever done any laptop stuff the ribbon cables are OK to work with, just pop up the retainer and they slide out. If you are not familiar just grab a 12 year old from an iphone factory, they will know how it works The case should now look like this:
    • Switching the console was tricky. First there were 6 screws to remove, and also the little adapter loom and its screws had to come out. Also don't forget to remove the 2 screws holding the central locking receiver. Then there are 4 clips on either side....these were very tight in this case and needed careful persuading with a long flat screw driver....some force required but not enough to break them...this was probably the fiddliest part of the whole job. In my case I needed both the wiring loom and the central locking receiver module to swap across to the new one. That was it for the console, so "assembly is the reverse of disassembly"
    • But first....while I was there, I also swapped across the centre console box for the other style where the AV inputs don't intrude into the (very limited !) space.  Part# was 96926-4GA0A, 284H3-4GA0B, 284H3-4GA0A. (I've already swapped the top 12v socket for a USB bulkhead in this pic, it fit the hole without modification:) Comparison of the 2: Basically to do the console you need to remove the DS and PS side console trim (they slide up and back, held in by clips only) Then remove the back half of the console top trim with the cupholders, pops up, all clips again but be careful at the front as it is pretty flimsy. Then slide the shifter boot down, remove the spring clip, loose it forever somewhere in the car the pull the shift knob off. Remove the tiny plastic piece on DS near "P" and use something thin and long (most screwdrivers won't fit) to push down the interlock and put the shifter down in D for space. There is one screw at the front, then the shifter surround and ashtray lift up. There are 3 or 4 plugs underneath and it is off. Next is the rear cover of the centre console; you need to open the console lid, pop off the trim covering the lid hinge and undo the 2rd screw from the driver's side (the rest all need to come out later so you can do them all now and remove the lid) Then the rear cover unclips (6 clips), start at the top with a trim tool pulling backwards. Once it is off there are 2 screws facing rearwards to remove (need a short phillips for these) and you are done with the rear of the console. There are 4 plugs at the A/V box to unclip Then there are 2 screws at the front of the console, and 2 clips (pull up and back) and the console will come out.
×
×
  • Create New...