Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 70
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I'm not recommending this, but just showing it for interests sake:

http://www.draganddrift.co.uk/photos/rick_...ug16_051745.jpg

Holy macaroni, Ive never heard of this turbo! is it new?

i gotta find some cars using this on youtube

Holy macaroni, Ive never heard of this turbo! is it new?

i gotta find some cars using this on youtube

Yeah mentioned them earlier in the thread when "GT45xx" based turbos came up.. they are pretty new and will probably be a pretty limited run. There is a drag GTR in the UK which is having one installed and should be doing some runs with it in the near future, same car did an 8.2 with a T51R Kai so should be very interesting to see what it does with something this substantial.

The real different is that HKS T51R KAi and SPL turbos use Garretts old T51 series Turbine in 76 trim , the Garrett marketed GT4294R and GT4202R use Garretts GT42 UHP turbine in 84 trim which is a more modern design .

Don't forget that most of the HKS spec Garrett turbo line has been around for a while now and sometimes use older T series compressors and turbines . Aside from T51's you have T04Z's with T series compressor and turbine so they aren't always cutting edge technology by todays standards . This doesn't means they're old dungers because often their custom housings make the best use of older tech wheels .

As was mentioned one of the GT42R's is going to be cheaper and at least stay with a variation of the T4/T45 footprint , the point is if you trash it and need to replace it the zeros will be less and the parts easier to get .

IMO you're looking at big turbos for an RB2530 so I hope you have deep pockets for the engine driveline etc .

Cheers A .

Edited by discopotato03
Holy macaroni, Ive never heard of this turbo! is it new?

i gotta find some cars using this on youtube

I don't think you will find the T62R BB as they still haven't been released yet. We have one on order for a customer in Aust. and should have here shortly for him. They are made in limited number and are pre order only (if anyone else wants one better PM me fast).

The Garrett equivalent weighs 10kg more than the T51 on our scales so that makes a big difference for starters. Attached is a pic of the exhaust housing available in 1.00 or 1.20 A/R which is a lot different to the Garrett.

Cheers

Marty

post-45152-1219619906_thumb.jpg

Edited by Martin HKS
Hey guys, your right i couldnt find any videos on youtube with cars running this new turbo but that didnt stop me from typing in 't51r' and watching some amazing supras, gtrs and even silvias running it. The sound is unmistakable.

You'll find if you search for GT42R/GT42RS/GT4202R cars will sound suspiciously similar :rofl:

The real different is that HKS T51R KAi and SPL turbos use Garretts old T51 series Turbine in 76 trim , the Garrett marketed GT4294R and GT4202R use Garretts GT42 UHP turbine in 84 trim which is a more modern design .

Don't forget that most of the HKS spec Garrett turbo line has been around for a while now and sometimes use older T series compressors and turbines . Aside from T51's you have T04Z's with T series compressor and turbine so they aren't always cutting edge technology by todays standards . This doesn't means they're old dungers because often their custom housings make the best use of older tech wheels .

As was mentioned one of the GT42R's is going to be cheaper and at least stay with a variation of the T4/T45 footprint , the point is if you trash it and need to replace it the zeros will be less and the parts easier to get .

IMO you're looking at big turbos for an RB2530 so I hope you have deep pockets for the engine driveline etc .

Cheers A .

I think the driveline should hold up ok. Ive got a C4 built byProtrans, 2 way diff and GTR drive shafts.

Yupe , as someone already mentioned it before

HKS T51R KAI = Garrett GT4294R

HKS T51R SPL = Garrett GT4202R

HKS T04Z = Garrett T67

of course Garrett units arent as bling as the HKS units :rofl:

As stated above, the SPL is actually a GT4502 not a GT4202.

And HKS T04Z = Garrett T04Z

Nope , T51R's use a T51 turbine which is why for some reason they're called "T51R" .

GT42's (4294 and 4202) use GT42 turbines .

There is also a GT4094R which not surprisingly uses a GT40 turbine .

A .

Sorry, I must have missed the point to your comment. Are you referring to what I said or what someone else has said?

No one above , Garrett virtually always call their turbos by the units turbine series number ie GT30 GT35 GT40 GT42 T4 etc etc .

The thing you will notice with large frame Garrett ball bearing "T" series turbos ie T04Z and T51R is the method of fixing the turbine housing to the side of the bearing housing (center section) . T series turbos use clamp plates and bolts where Garretts large frame bush or ball bearing GT series units have four "ears" on the back of the center section through which bolts screw into a series of threaded holes in the side of the turbine housing .

Its just a way of making a more modern cartridge fit the old T series turbine housings which make a matching set with the old T series turbines ie T04 P trim and T51 turbines .

Pay no attention to the American term "T67" compressor wheel , it's a flawed method of attempting to identify a compressor wheel by it's inducer diameter which in the case of the T04R compressor (used in T04Z turbo) is ~ 66.7mm . Precision over there sometimes calls their version of the T04Z PT67 meaning T04 P trim turbine + "T67" compressor .

I've no doubt HKSs housings are lighter and more compact than Garretts , the volute and nozzle sections of their housings are very different and more like the TiAL stainless steel ones .

A HKS spec T51R is not exactly a compact turbocharger , I suggest people search around for pics of GTRs with them fitted .

A .

Edited by discopotato03

Turbonetics GTK Series (650, 800, 1000)

SEMA product of the year, less than half the price, can't go wrong.

And in case you're wondering what GTK stands for; according to them it's "Garrett Turbo Killer" :rofl:

And in case you're wondering what GTK stands for; according to them it's "Garrett Turbo Killer" :action-smiley-069:

Shame they are way more laggy and expensive than the Garrett GT series, at least they are pretty and strong :blink:

Shame they are way more laggy and expensive than the Garrett GT series, at least they are pretty and strong :action-smiley-069:

I think lag is comparable to the Garrett series (don't have actual proof so won't make any claims), but expensive? A GTK 650 turbo will cost you AUD $1800.00 delivered if you go through the right avenues.

And yes I concur they are pretty (not sure about the strong bit, no proof either)

Ive only heard bad reports about turbonetics turbos, can any confirm on reliability if any one in aus is using them?

I am in NZ, a mate of mine was running a Turbonetics T66 on his GTS4 for quite some time and it did hold on fine until he blew his motor and the oil got contaminated and stuffed the turbo. It was quite impressively laggy given it was on a 3litre, though granted it was a plain bearing/non GTK version. I'm surprised to hear they are potentially competitively price in Oz as here they are really expensive, probably part of the reason they are never used.

Its interesting that in their country of origin hardly anyone seems to use them either if you look through specs of all their time attack and top drag cars.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
×
×
  • Create New...