Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

you going to run it in completely stock like the 355?

yeah didn't think so

uh, no the point was his 240rwkw gtst vs a similar year itallian

so, i said i'd run my 245kw low boost setting... fairly obviously NOT stock :)

the ENTIRE point of his comment was comparing a modified car to the itallians

gtr's have curves in all the right places, so in other words they are the ones you would rather be with.

the gts-t's are like the stick figure models, not alot of meat, nothing to grab onto, not to mention the lack of muscle!

I'd take a 355 over anything in the skyline range.

anybody who says otherwise is a raging cock eater for sure.

Couldn't care if a stock R32 GTST beats it

more than you can afford pal.!!

lol i have this argument EVERY DAY at uni with my mates...

at the end of the day, i drive my car about 5 times a week, and i don't have a garage spot so it sits outside...

i don't think a 355 would last long in those circumstances...

im the same

i thought of taking out a novated lease with work and salary sacrifice for a brand new car. but honestly. out there i don't know which brand new car, bang for buck has as much performance, looks, value for money, cheap to mod, great fun as my line. was considering new ford falcon turbo. but still. my 98 black r33 looks 1000 times better.

my boss has an 08 sti for 80 grand. subaru can forget it. driven it and was not impressed at all. even after tuning mods. so until something better comes my way thats in my price range im keeping my skyline.

hahahaha...yeah skylines... they rock !!!

the other day i was thinking what i'd buy if i sold mine, and i came up with.................... another skyline lol. seriously. its bad.

My thoughts exactly!!!

hahahaha...yeah skylines... they rock !!!

the other day i was thinking what i'd buy if i sold mine, and i came up with.................... another skyline lol. seriously. its bad.

Heck ya!!

Unfortunately I'm limited to the 15yr rule of importing japanese cars (canadian, eh), so my options are a little more limited.

I have a R32 GTS-t with tasteful mods that make it fun....

But I want to get a 93 GTR next year.

Or just spend a crap load on my GTS-t.

I think a GTS-t would be cheaper to make faster.

I've also thought about upgrading fuel, and sweet turbo, and then RB25... hmmm

So many options even just with skylines!

I'm leaning towards that because I can put some GTR front fenders on my car to widen it a little, and then RB25 + goodies for a very drivable 350-400 power.

Then I just need to find the perfect rims...

Edited by Chris_RB

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
    • @GTSBoy yeah sorry i know thery are known for colors bud those DBA are too in colors 🙂 Green will be good enough for me  
×
×
  • Create New...