Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey everyone. Got a bit of a problem hope you guys have some insight and help me with an idea.

The car is a Cefiro. RB25 with a bunch or interesting things done to it. RB26 crank, rods 87.5 bore, 10:1 comp, welsh removed on factory RB25 head with some sort of 25 cam shaft combo. I know they are HKS but not sure of spec. Have an adj ex cam gear and the VVT disabled. GReddy TDO6 25g 16cm 1bar on C16 gas.

Now problem is just a sound for now. Car is set up for drifting. We know the turbo is gay for this so dont make fun of our lag monster. After we do 2-3 hard laps I get a tick tick come from the top end. Its hard to pin point the location but sounds like a lifter or even some sort of exhaust leak but its not. After I cool the oil down to 60deg and shut off the car and turn back on a couple times the tick goes away and we go for another lap. The tick didnt bother me too much as we are going to be changing our set up SOON but since money got low and I need to use this engine for 2 more rounds of our series and I just want to see if any of you guys have any quick fix ideas to this problem. or just a general idea if you've run into something like this before.

Now the guys that built the engine a year ago are not reliable and I dont even trust anything they say or did to the engine so I can not tell you if there was a oil restricter was installed. They did say the head was serviced but thats about all I can tell you. My oil/water temps are fine, tune is healthy.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/233403-tick-tick-in-top-end-rb25/
Share on other sites

If this is occurring during/after a session, have you considered the type/grade of oil you're running? I wonder if once the oil is hot that it is simply a bit too thin to maintain adequate pressure in the hydraulic lifters and they are bleeding out a bit?

Maybe something like a 10W60 is what you need.

If this is occurring during/after a session, have you considered the type/grade of oil you're running? I wonder if once the oil is hot that it is simply a bit too thin to maintain adequate pressure in the hydraulic lifters and they are bleeding out a bit?

Maybe something like a 10W60 is what you need.

Ya, thats an idea I've thought of. We were using a 30 weight and I went to a 40 for last race and it did'nt make the problem any better. I'll give the 60 weight a go next practice to see what goes on.

I've also been getting a bit of oil in the catch can. It varies, sometimes I will get nothing and then sometimes I will get 1-2 ounces with a few hard laps. Thats why I was opting for the heavier oil to see if this changes as leak and compression are good. So it does seem like the oil is a bit thin and too much up top in the head. This engine also has RB26 valve covers on the 25 head. The baffles in the rear look good so it does'nt seem to be part of any problems but maybe you guys might have something else to say about that.

Any more ideas very welcome :O

Edited by RB30 Ceffy

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...